Skip to content
Child Aid International Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Child Aid International Inc

We work with other not-for-profit organizations to help them increase their participation and success in public-sector workplace charitable fund drives.

$112k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$743kEducation$91kArts & Culture$61kHealth$24kCrime & Legal$9kHuman Services$9kYouth Development$7k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $71,280, the rows itemized in this filing. The $112,279 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $40,999 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
$7,106
Median grant
5
States reached
$25k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EXODUS ROAD INC$25,191
HERBIE HANCOCK INSTITUTE OF JAZZ$12,449
MESSENGER OF LOVE$8,024
PRATHAM USA$7,106
ASSIST INTERNATIONAL INC$7,066
HIMALAYAN CHILDREN'S FUND$5,775
BATEY RELIEF ALLIANCE INC$5,669
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%BATEY RELIEF ALLIANCE INC: $13k → 20%BATEY RELIEF ALLIANCE INC: $10k → 20%BATEY RELIEF ALLIANCE INC: $6k → 20%BATEY RELIEF ALLIANCE INC: $7k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
ND
MN
WI
NY
OR
IN
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$831k · 17 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$831k
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+51%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalPhilanthropyReligionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    THE EXODUS ROAD INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $176k · revenue +221%
  • PU
    PRATHAM USA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $91k · revenue +20%
  • TG
    THE GOD'S CHILD PROJECT
    7× · 2017–2023 · $71k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • GM
    GLOBAL MEDICAL RELIEF FUND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue -35%
  • LI
    LOVE146 INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue +110%
  • OH
    ORPHAN HELPERSINCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue +166%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding Hungry Children International

Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.

—
2
Childrens Global Alliance

Provide assistance with orphanages and schooling.

Human Services
3
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
4
Children of Promise International

Children of promise international is a nonprofit organization providing humanitarian aid, relief and development in approximately 7 countries for the purpose of caring for orphans, widows, and destitute children and outreach to the poor…

—
5
Kids for Him

assisting orphans and missionary in need

International
6
Orphans Hope International
—
7
Onechild Global

One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.

International
8
International Humanity Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Children Rescues International

Mobilize loving and qualified Pastors, Caregivers, Educators, Administrative Personnel, and Volunteers to establish Children's Homes, Schools, and Medical Clinics in Liberia. Facilities and programming are designed to care for orphaned…

International
10
Honduras Child Alliance
Philanthropy
11
Global Family Care Network Inc

Protecting children and preserving families in vulnerable communities with an emphasis on the prevention, intervention, and restoration of young victims of commercial sexual exploitation and human trafficking. The organization works in the…

International
12
Shared Blessings International Christian Ministries Inc

Provides aid to orphans in devastated areas, primarily Uganda, India, and Myanmar. Children are directly sponsored and specific projects which will benefit the children that are underwritten. Projects include hospitals, schools, and other…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The God's Child Project; the most unlike its peers is American Youth Understanding Diabetes Abroad Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE EXODUS ROAD INC: $176,028 · InternationalTHE EXODUS ROAD INCMESSENGERS OF LOVE: $75,928 · InternationalMESSENGERS OF LOVETHE GOD'S CHILD PROJECT: $70,564 · InternationalTHE GOD'S CHILD PROJECTASSIST INTERNATIONAL INC: $58,117 · InternationalASSIST INTERNATIONAL INCORPHAN RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL: $56,775 · InternationalORPHAN RESOURCES INTERNATIONALAlliance for Children Everywhere: $36,970 · InternationalAlliance for Children EverywhereWORLD PEDIATRICS: $23,669 · InternationalEVERY CHILD MINISTRIES: $22,104 · InternationalA FAMILY FOR EVERY ORPHAN: $22,047 · International+11 more: $106,432 · International+11 morePRATHAM USA: $90,940 · PhilanthropyPRATHAM USATHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $5,498 · PhilanthropyTHE GLOBAL …HERBIE HANCOCK INSTITUTE OF JAZZ: $61,218 · Arts & CultureBATEY RELIEF ALLIANCE BRA: $35,237 · Human ServicesGLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $5,545 · Human ServicesLITTLE CHILDREN OF THE WORLD INC: $29,333 · OtherSeeds of Learning: $6,830 · OtherPartner for Surgery Inc: $6,749 · OtherFrontier Horizon Inc: $6,725 · OtherCORE INC: $6,547 · OtherZOE INTERNATIONAL: $23,606 · ReligionSABA INTERNATIONAL: $7,441 · ReligionLOVE146 INC: $9,088 · Crime & Legal
International$648,634Philanthropy$96,438Arts & Culture$61,218Human Services$40,782Other$56,184Religion$31,047Crime & Legal$9,088

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE EXODUS ROAD INC: $176,028 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $90,940 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMESSENGERS OF LOVE: $75,928 over 8y, 14% of budgetTHE GOD'S CHILD PROJECT: $70,564 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetHERBIE HANCOCK INSTITUTE OF JAZZ: $61,218 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetASSIST INTERNATIONAL INC: $58,117 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetORPHAN RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL: $56,775 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetAlliance for Children Everywhere: $36,970 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBATEY RELIEF ALLIANCE BRA: $35,237 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetLITTLE CHILDREN OF THE WORLD INC: $29,333 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetWORLD PEDIATRICS: $23,669 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetZOE INTERNATIONAL: $23,606 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEVERY CHILD MINISTRIES: $22,104 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetA FAMILY FOR EVERY ORPHAN: $22,047 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL: $20,562 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetChildren of God Relief Fund Inc: $15,847 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHIMALAYAN CHILDRENS FUND: $12,127 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGLOBAL MEDICAL RELIEF FUND INC: $9,239 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLOVE146 INC: $9,088 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetORPHAN HELPERSINC: $8,624 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCARING FOR CAMBODIA INC: $7,649 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHELP THE HELPLESS: $7,473 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSeeds of Learning: $6,830 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPartner for Surgery Inc: $6,749 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAMERICAN YOUTH UNDERSTANDING DIABETES ABROAD INC: $6,734 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetFrontier Horizon Inc: $6,725 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCORE INC: $6,547 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE: $6,172 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $6,085 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETHANY RELIEF & REHABILITATION: $5,920 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $5,545 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $5,498 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community F…Globalgiving Foundati…Morgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…ImpactassetsincServant FoundationRaymond James Charita…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Blackbaud Giving …Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…
Christian Community Foundation IncCO15× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Child Aid International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Child Aid International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • LOVE146 Inc: 49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Child Aid International Inc?

Find your warmest path to Child Aid International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $120k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Child Aid International’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home