Which funders back the same organizations as Chicagoland Habitat for Humanity James Harris Treasurer?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Habitat for Humanity International Inc, Thrivent Financial for Lutherans-Group, Arthur J Gallagher Foundation.

Chicagoland Habitat for Humanity James Harris Treasurer

Chicagoland Habitat for Humanity James Harris Treasurer at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Chicagoland Habitat for Humanity James Harris Treasurer

Q: How much does Chicagoland Habitat for Humanity James Harris Treasurer give?

Chicagoland Habitat for Humanity James Harris Treasurer reported 7 itemized grants totaling $2,675,119, out of $3,172,133 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 9 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

Q: What does Chicagoland Habitat for Humanity James Harris Treasurer fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Housing & Shelter (100%).

Q: Who are Chicagoland Habitat for Humanity James Harris Treasurer's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Dupage Habitat for Humanity ($1.5M), Habitat for Humanity of Northern Fox Valley ($1.5M), Will County Habitat for Humanity ($1.4M).

Q: Does Chicagoland Habitat for Humanity James Harris Treasurer fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Q: Where is Chicagoland Habitat for Humanity James Harris Treasurer based?

Chicagoland Habitat for Humanity James Harris Treasurer is based in IL.

The organization raises funds for low cost housing and distributes them to habitat for humanity affiliates to aid in home construction.

$3.2M

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$647k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$8.0M

02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 7 grants below total $2,675,119, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,172,133 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $497,014 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k1 grant · $49k
$50k–250k1 grant · $112k
$250k+5 grants · $2.5M

$465,873

Median grant

States reached

$4.7M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MCHENRY COUNTY	$647,352
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NORTHERN FOX VALLEY	$614,688
WILL COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY	$517,170
DUPAGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY	$465,873
LAKE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY	$268,826
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO	$112,154
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF FOX VALLEY	$49,056

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 33% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$8.0M · 8 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$8.0M

$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%

+28%

Still filing today

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Housing & ShelterInternationalOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

DH
DUPAGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +60%
HF
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NORTHERN FOX VALLEY
9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +84%
WC
WILL COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +242%

Funded once

HF
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +28%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Habitat for Humanity of the San Juans

Provide affordable housing to the disadvantaged

Housing & Shelter

Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—

Habitat for Humanity International Scotts Bluff County

Most construction work is performed by volunteers

—

Habitat for Humanity of West Central Mn

Helping families thrive through affordable homeownership.

—

Habitat for Humanity of Waukesha County Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action. habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—

Habitat for Humanity International Inc

Seeking to put gods love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—

Habitat for Humanity of Green County Inc

Build and repair housing for needy families

Housing & Shelter

Habitat for Humanity International Wabash County Hfh

Wabash county habitat for humanity, inc. is a non-profit organization working in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to build decent, affordable housing.

—

Habitat for Humanity International Ponca City Area

Provide decent housing to needy families at an affordable amount. the homes are sold based on monthly, interest-free payments over 30 years.

—

Habitat for Humanity of St Francois County Inc

To provide affordable housing for the needy.

—

Habitat for Humanity International Inc

Seeking to put gods love into action, habitat for humanity of kosciusko county brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

Housing & Shelter

Habitat for Humanity of Worcester County Inc

To build and rehabilitate houses which are sold to low-income families through no-interest loans

—

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Restore of Fox Valley Habitat for Humanity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

9/9

Grantees still filing

9/9

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Housing & Shelter$5,207,777Other$2,778,208International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Habitat for Humanity International IncGA19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Habitat for Humanity International Inc · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans-Group · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chicagoland Habitat for Humanity James Harris Treasurer funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chicagoland Habitat for Humanity James Harris Treasurer. Bigger dots raise more.

2023

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Chicagoland Habitat for Humanity James Harris Treasurer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home