Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Chester & Muriel Dawes Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$284k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$324kYouth Development$250kHuman Services$235kReligion$200kEnvironment$93kFood & Nutrition$24k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOOTHBAY REGION STUDENT AID FUND$100,000
BOOTHBAY REGION YMCA$100,000
Hearty Roots$50,000
BOOTHBAY HARBOR ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION$30,000
BOOTHBAY REGION FOOD PANTRY$4,484
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BOOTHBAY REGION FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 9%BOOTHBAY REGION FOOD PANTRY: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 10 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$1.1M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+1%

Still filing today

90%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    BOOTHBAY REGION STUDENT AID FUND IN
    4× · 2020–2025 · $240k · revenue +102%
  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association Boothbay Region
    5× · 2020–2025 · $235k · revenue +37%
  • MS
    Maine Seacoast Mission
    4× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +1%
  • LP
    LOCKER PROJECT (Maine)
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boothbay Region Maritime Foundation

Preserving our Maritime Heritage by supporting working waterfront, promoting sustainable practices, and embracing the educational opportunities this stewardship provides.

Environment
2
Boothbay Harbor Waterfront Preservation

The organization aims to enhance the traditional character of Boothbay Harbor, with a particular focus on protecting the working waterfront and expanding public access to the water for the benefit of both residents and visitors.

Environment
3
Brunswick-Topsham Land Trust Inc

Brunswick-Topsham Land Trust conserves and stewards vital natural areas, supports a vibrant local food system, and connects people with the natural world through inclusive education and recreation programs. Our goal is to protect our…

Environment
4
Kennebunk Land Trust

Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.

Environment
5
Boothbay Harbor Region Chamber of Commerce

Promotion of the boothbay harbor area of maine for tourism and industry and maintenance of a regional information center for the general public.

6
Boothbay Sea and Science Center

The mission of the boothbay sea and science center is the advancement of sailing, boating and ocean sciences by minimizing economic and physical obstacles and further to develop independence, self-confidence, teamwork and volunteerism in…

Education
7
Boothbay Region Housing Trust

To build affordable homes for working men and women.

Housing & Shelter
8
Boothbay Railway Village

The mission of the boothbay railway village is to conserve, display and interpret artifacts, authentic period structures and technologies utilized in maine during the historical period of the mid-19th through the mid-20th centuries.

Arts & Culture
9
Boys & Girls Clubs of Southern Maine

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as responsible, productive and caring citizens.

Youth Development
10
Boothbay Harbor Yacht Club

To encourage all aspects of yachting in the boothbay harbor region of maine.

11
Coastal Mountains Land Trust

We conserve land permanently to benefit the natural and human communities of western the Penobscot Bay region.

Environment
12
Boothbay Region Community Resource Council

The primary purpose of this organization is to bring heating, food, monetary, and housing assistance to low income individuals and families providing a community navigator to help guide these families to other available assistance and…

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boothbay Region Land Trust and the most unlike its peers is James L Mckeown Boys and Girls Club of Woburn Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Young Men's Christian Association Boothbay Region — $235,000 · OtherYoung Men's Christian Association Boothbay RegionHILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH — $199,702 · OtherHILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCHMaine Seacoast Mission — $100,000 · OtherMaine Seacoast Mission+2 more — $20,000 · OtherBOOTHBAY REGION STUDENT AID FUND IN — $240,000 · EducationBOOTHBAY REGION STUDENT AID…Boothbay Harbor Rotary Club Foundation I — $30,000 · EducationBoothbay Harbor Rotary Club…HEARTY ROOTS INC — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentHEARTY ROOTS I…JAMES L MCKEOWN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WOBURN INC — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentJAMES L MCKEOW…Boothbay Region Land Trust — $60,000 · EnvironmentBoothbay …Coastal Maine Botanical Gardens Inc — $32,926 · EnvironmentCoastal M…THE BOTTOM LINE INC — $54,000 · Community ImprovementBOOTHBAY REGION FOOD PANTRY — $14,484 · Human Services
Other$554,702Education$270,000Youth Development$140,000Environment$92,926Community Improvement$54,000Human Services$14,484

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOOTHBAY REGION STUDENT AID FUND IN — $240,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association Boothbay Region — $235,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetMaine Seacoast Mission — $100,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHEARTY ROOTS INC — $100,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetBoothbay Region Land Trust — $60,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTHE BOTTOM LINE INC — $54,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJAMES L MCKEOWN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WOBURN INC — $40,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCoastal Maine Botanical Gardens Inc — $32,926 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBoothbay Harbor Rotary Club Foundation I — $30,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetBOOTHBAY REGION FOOD PANTRY — $14,484 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME19.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Leach Elizabeth Ann Pfdn · Palmer Walbridge Foundation · Schacknow Family Foundation Inc · A R and Marylouise Tandy Foundation · Mildred H McEvoy Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Chester & Muriel Dawes Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 22%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc22% of income from government
  • The Bottom Line Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Chester & Muriel Dawes Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Chester & Muriel Dawes Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph