How much did A R AND MARYLOUISE TANDY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of A R AND MARYLOUISE TANDY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

gardentulsamuseum artboothbay harborsouthportbuildingeducation

2019

gilcreasegardentulsamuseum artchurchsouthportboothbay harbor

2020

tulsamuseum artboothbay harborsouthportchurcheducationbuilding

2021

tulsamuseum artsouthporteducationoperaboothbay harbor

2022

—

2023

tulsamuseum artphilbrook museumeducationholland hallboothbay harbor

2024

bigelow laboratorylaboratory oceanocean scienctowngardentulsamuseum art

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k15 grants · $100k
$10k–50k19 grants · $371k
$50k–250k4 grants · $292k
$250k+7 grants · $6.3M

$16,500

Median grant

States reached

$153k

Total assets

Largest grants

ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY$1,450,000
BOOTHBAY REGION YMCA$1,250,000
PORTLAND MUSEUM OF ART$1,000,000
YMCA OF GREATER TULSA$1,000,000
HOLLAND HALL SCHOOL$650,000
BIGELOW LABORATORY FOR OCEAN SCIENC$500,000
TULSA BOTANIC GARDEN$500,000
ST FRANCIS HEALTH SYSTEM$100,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TULSA$70,500
ZILLMAN ART MUSEUM$61,500
SOUTHPORT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$60,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$37,500
CONNECTICUT COLLEGE FUND$31,500
SOUTHPORT UNITED METH CHURCH$31,500
TRINITY WOODS INC$28,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$37M · 49 repeat orgs$25M to everyone else

49 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$37M

$23M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%

+46%

Still filing today

43%

48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentCrime & LegalPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART
7× · 2017–2024 · $10M · revenue +142% · 52% of their budget
LIFE SENIOR SERVICES
2× · 2017–2022 · $1.2M · revenue +15%
PORTLAND MUSEUM OF ART
7× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +57%

Funded once

GM
GILCREASE MUSEUM
one grant, 2019 · $10M
FAMILY SAFETY CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $3.0M · revenue +891% · 38% of their budget
CHILD ABUSE NETWORKgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $2.0M · revenue +60% · 27% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Tulsa Bike Share Inc

Transforming our Tulsa community by providing a high quality, convenient, and affordable bicycle transit system that connects people to places where they live, work, and play.

Environment

Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan

The tulsa regional chamber is the principal business-driven leadership organization improving the quality of community life through the development of regional economic prosperity. for more than 100 years, the tulsa regional chamber has…

—

Tulsa Childrens Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture

Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education

The Toledo Museum of Art

Through our collection and programs, we strive to integrate art into the lives of people. the museum seeks to become the model art museum in the united states for its commitment to quality and its culture of belonging.

Arts & Culture

Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals

Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma

Empowering families on their journey to independence.

Housing & Shelter

Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and

To be the unified voice of business & the most effective advocacy organization at the Capitol

—

Ywca Tulsa Inc

YWCA Tulsa is dedicated to eliminating racism and empowering women.

Human Services

Chamber Music Tulsa

To share the experience of chamber music through live performance and community engagement

Arts & Culture

University of the Ozarks

A presbyterian church related university that provides undergraduate liberal arts education.

Education

Arts & Humanities Council of Tulsa

To cultivate a more creative tulsa through advocacy, education and innovative partnerships, which contribute to the quality of life and economic vitality of the greater community.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Abuse Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Portland Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/33

the rest of the field

11%

729/6,579

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

33/33

Grantees still filing

23/33

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$35,924,291Arts & Culture$11,219,550Crime & Legal$5,000,000Education$4,929,850Human Services$2,391,640Food & Nutrition$2,000,000Environment$324,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK37.7× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Flint Family Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · The David E & Cassie L Temple Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation A R AND MARYLOUISE TANDY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

17get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.4× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 730579279 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 52% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to A R and Marylouise Tandy Foundation?

Find your warmest path to A R and Marylouise Tandy Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

A R AND MARYLOUISE TANDY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to A R and Marylouise Tandy Foundation?

More from the funding graph

A R AND MARYLOUISE TANDY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to A R and Marylouise Tandy Foundation?

More from the funding graph