Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

A R and Marylouise Tandy Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
45
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Arts & Culture$21MHuman Services$10MEducation$9.7MHealth$5.8MCrime & Legal$5.1MFood & Nutrition$3.5MScience & Tech$2.6MEnvironment$1.8MOther$0
02FY2024 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $100k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $371k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $292k
  • $250k+7 grants · $6.3M
$16,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$153k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY$1,450,000
BOOTHBAY REGION YMCA$1,250,000
PORTLAND MUSEUM OF ART$1,000,000
YMCA OF GREATER TULSA$1,000,000
HOLLAND HALL SCHOOL$650,000
TULSA BOTANIC GARDEN$500,000
BIGELOW LABORATORY FOR OCEAN SCIENC$500,000
ST FRANCIS HEALTH SYSTEM$100,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TULSA$70,500
ZILLMAN ART MUSEUM$61,500
SOUTHPORT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$60,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$37,500
CONNECTICUT COLLEGE FUND$31,500
SOUTHPORT UNITED METH CHURCH$31,500
TRINITY WOODS INC$28,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $503k → 14%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $11k → 14%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $2k → 14%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $2k → 14%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $2k → 14%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $2k → 14%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $21k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 9%CLAREHOUSE INC: $35k → 15%CLAREHOUSE INC: $22k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $1.0M → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $1.0M → 15%OKLAHOMA METHODIST MANOR: $506k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $200k → 15%DVIS: $80k → 15%TRINITY WOODS INC: $29k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $20k → 15%OKLAHOMA METHODIST MANOR: $11k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $10k → 15%OKLAHOMA METHODIST MANOR: $6k → 15%TRINITY WOODS INC: $6k → 15%OKLAHOMA METHODIST MANOR: $6k → 15%OKLAHOMA METHODIST MANOR: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$37M · 50 repeat orgs$25M to everyone else

50 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
22

Total granted

$37M
$23M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+28%

Still filing today

60%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $10M · revenue +253% · 52% of their budget
  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association Boothbay Region
    5× · 2017–2024 · $5.1M · revenue +69% · 57% of their budget
  • BL
    Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences
    4× · 2018–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • GM
    GILCREASE MUSEUM
    one grant, 2019 · $10M
  • FAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3.0M · revenue +4% · 38% of their budget
  • Meals on Wheels of Norman Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2.0M · revenue +36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
2
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
3
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
4
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
5
Tulsa Children's Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture
6
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
7
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc

Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.

Animals
8
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
9
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
10
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
11
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 12 & 12 Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sooner Rowing Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyMusic & Theater Arts Organi…Land and Water ConservationCoastal Fisheries & Waterfr…Youth Education & Cultural …Tulsa Community Health & Se…Youth Development Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr18%20%20–35yr14%20%35–55yr14%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr18%2%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr14%57%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/50
the rest of the field
13%
860/6,562

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/48
Grantees still filing
38/48
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GILCREASE MUSEUM — $10,000,000 · OtherGILCREASE MUSEUMYoung Men's Christian Association Boothbay Region — $5,138,000 · OtherYoung Men's Christian Association Boothbay RegionPARKSIDE PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL — $5,000,000 · OtherPARKSIDE PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALHOLLAND HALL — $4,666,500 · OtherHOLLAND HALLTULSA BOTANIC GARDEN — $1,100,000 · Other+38 more — $5,091,491 · Other+38 moreTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC — $10,071,450 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM…Portland Museum of Art — $1,020,900 · Arts & CulturePortland Museum of A…+9 more — $145,900 · Arts & CultureFAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC — $3,000,000 · Crime & LegalFAMILY SA…Child Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network — $2,000,000 · Crime & LegalChild Abu…Tulsa Community College Foundation — $2,100,000 · EducationTulsa Com…ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY — $1,450,000 · EducationORAL ROBE…The Pencil Box Inc — $750,000 · EducationThe Penci…DREXEL ACADEMY INC — $450,000 · EducationDREXEL AC…+3 more — $179,850 · EducationLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC — $1,200,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA — $1,030,000 · Human ServicesTRINITY WOODS INC — $567,100 · Human ServicesEmergency Infant Services Inc — $523,450 · Human Services+4 more — $227,590 · Human ServicesMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc — $2,000,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $1,500,000 · Food & NutritionBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences — $2,578,000 · Science & Tech
Other$30,995,991Arts & Culture$11,238,250Crime & Legal$5,000,000Education$4,929,850Human Services$3,548,140Food & Nutrition$3,500,000Science & Tech$2,578,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC — $10,071,450 over 7y, 52% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association Boothbay Region — $5,138,000 over 5y, 57% of budgetFAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC — $3,000,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences — $2,578,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetTulsa Community College Foundation — $2,100,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetChild Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network — $2,000,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $1,500,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY — $1,450,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC — $1,200,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA — $1,030,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetPortland Museum of Art — $1,020,900 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $814,200 over 1y, 10% of budgetThe Pencil Box Inc — $750,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetTRINITY WOODS INC — $567,100 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc — $523,450 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES — $500,000 over 1y, 17% of budget12 & 12 INC — $500,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC — $500,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetDREXEL ACADEMY INC — $450,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetTransitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc — $360,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetBoothbay Harbor Waterfront Preservation — $302,100 over 2y, 24% of budgetBoothbay Region Land Trust — $266,500 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetThe University of Tulsa — $162,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHealth Outreach Prevention Education Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES — $80,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetClarehouse Inc — $57,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTulsa Garden Center — $55,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $46,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY — $46,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC — $44,090 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCoastal Maine Botanical Gardens Inc — $38,600 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTulsa Symphony Orchestra Inc — $30,400 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTULSA OPERA INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ART — $23,450 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetFIT FIRST RESPONDERS INC — $21,400 over 7y, 13% of budgetHONOR BUNKER INC — $19,800 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetTULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $17,600 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTHE OPERA HOUSE AT BOOTHBAY HARBOR — $12,600 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetA POCKET FULL OF HOPE INC — $12,250 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE — $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAINE STATE MUSIC THEATRE — $9,350 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMaine Public Broadcasting Corporation — $9,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $9,350 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMAINE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $9,350 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMaine Maritime Museum — $8,800 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBOOTHBAY REGION STUDENT AID FUND IN — $7,100 over 5y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Za…The Hardesty Family F…Ralph and Frances McG…Grace & Franklin Bern…Flint Family Foundati…Mervin Bovaird Founda…Tulsa Community Found…Maxine and Jack Zarro…The Gelvin FoundationOneok Foundation IncOne Gas Foundation IncThe Sharna and Irvin …
The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK54.2× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Flint Family Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc · One Gas Foundation Inc · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization A R and Marylouise Tandy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 160%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services — 15% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa — 5% of income from government
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Oral Roberts University — 0% of income from government
  • Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
16get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home