Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Cherokee Crossroads Inc

Put on a music festival to raise funds for grants to 501(c)3 organizations.

$214k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$812kCrime & Legal$463kHealth$296kHousing & Shelter$170kPublic Safety & Disaster$120kYouth Development$116kFood & Nutrition$45kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$928k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDREN$60,000
ANNETTE G STRAUSS FAMILY GATEWAY$35,000
DALLAS CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER$25,000
CHEROKEE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$15,000
BIG BROTHER BIG SISTERS$15,000
SALESMANSHIP CLUB$10,000
LIFE SAVERS FOUNDATION$5,000
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$5,000
HERO COMMUNITY PROGRAM INC$5,000
TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE CHILDREN$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
GRANTASTARR FOUNDATION$2,500
MARCH OF DIMES$2,500
CHINN GUITAR PROJECT INC$2,500
SM WRIGHT FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Texas Pythian Home Inc: $5k → 8%Cherokee Home for Children: $80k → 19%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%Youth Champions Charity: $5k → 8%Texas Pythian Home Inc: $5k → 8%Cherokee Home for Children: $80k → 19%Texas Pythian Home Inc: $5k → 8%Cherokee Home for Children: $80k → 19%Texas Pythian Home Inc: $2k → 8%Cherokee Home for Children: $80k → 19%TEXAS PYTHIAN HOME INC: $2k → 8%Cherokee Home for Children: $80k → 19%TEXAS PYTHIAN HOME INC: $2k → 8%CHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDREN: $60k → 19%CHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDREN: $60k → 19%Cherokee Home for Children: $40k → 19%LIFE SAVERS FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%Life Savers Foundation: $5k → 14%LIFE SAVERS FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%Life Savers Foundation: $3k → 14%Dallas Childrens Advocacy Center: $75k → 14%Dallas Childrens Advocacy Center: $75k → 14%Christmas in the Park SM Wright Fou: $5k → 14%Dallas Childrens Advocacy Center: $75k → 14%SM WRIGHT FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%Dallas Childrens Advocacy Center: $25k → 14%SM WRIGHT FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%DALLAS CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $25k → 14%SM Wright Foundation: $3k → 14%Dallas Childrens Advocacy Center: $25k → 14%Christmas in the Park SM Wright Fou: $3k → 14%Dallas Childrens Advocacy Center: $25k → 14%Christmas in the Park SM Wright Fou: $3k → 14%DALLAS CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $25k → 14%SM Wright Foundation: $3k → 14%Hope Supply: $13k → 14%Hope Supply: $13k → 14%Hope Supply: $13k → 14%Hope Supply: $10k → 14%Hope Supply: $8k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY: $3k → 14%Hope Supply: $3k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 25 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
4

Total granted

$2.0M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+204%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalArts & CultureHousing & ShelterCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $350k · revenue +24%
  • FG
    FAMILY GATEWAY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $170k · revenue +112%
  • SC
    Salesmanship Club of Dallas
    7× · 2018–2024 · $110k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +38%
  • CA
    CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k · revenue +4%
  • CM
    Choose Mental Healthgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +585%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
6
Dallas Physician Medical Services for Children Inc

Provide dental, general pediatric, and pediatric sub-specialty services, including, but not limited to emergency department coverage, inpatient coverage, orthopedic surgery, and craniofacial orthodontics regardless of payor source or…

Health
7
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
8
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
9
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
10
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
11
Anesthesiologists for Children

Provide anesthesia services to patients at children's medical center of dallas. these services are provided without regard to a patient's ability to pay for the services.

12
Children's Hospital Association of Texas

To advance children's health and well-being by advocating for policies and funding that promote children's access to high-quality, comprehensive health care.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is The Starr Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChild & Youth Support Servi…Emergency Assistance & Basi…Child & Family Support Serv…Healthcare Delivery NetworksCharter and Independent Sch…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr10%31%35–55yr13%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr16%8%20–35yr10%36%35–55yr13%48%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,772

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
22/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDREN — $560,000 · Human ServicesCHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDRENDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $350,000 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERHOPE SUPPLY CO — $62,500 · Human ServicesHOPE SUPPLY CO+5 more — $68,500 · Human Services+5 moreCHEROKEE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $115,000 · OtherCHEROKEE VOLUNTEER FIRE…Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America — $105,000 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sister…THE REFUGE FOR DMST — $65,000 · OtherTHE REFUGE FOR DMSTNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $45,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKHEROES FOR CHILDREN — $35,000 · OtherHEROES FOR CHILDRENChinn Guitar Project Inc — $25,000 · OtherChinn Guitar Project In…+6 more — $38,000 · Other+6 moreTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $58,750 · HealthTEXAS SCOT…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $41,250 · HealthSHRINERS H…CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $37,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $30,000 · HealthST JUDE CH…MARCH OF DIMES INC — $17,500 · HealthMARCH OF D…GRANT-A-STARR FOUNDATION — $12,500 · HealthGRANT-A-ST…FAMILY GATEWAY INC — $170,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY GA…WILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $65,000 · Crime & LegalHILL COUNTRY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER — $42,500 · Crime & LegalCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC — $5,000 · Crime & LegalSalesmanship Club of Dallas — $110,000 · Community ImprovementDALLAS CASA — $20,000 · Civil Rights
Human Services$1,041,000Other$428,000Health$197,500Housing & Shelter$170,000Crime & Legal$112,500Community Improvement$110,000Civil Rights$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDREN — $560,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $350,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY GATEWAY INC — $170,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSalesmanship Club of Dallas — $110,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America — $105,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $65,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetTHE REFUGE FOR DMST — $65,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHOPE SUPPLY CO — $62,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $58,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILL COUNTRY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER — $42,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $41,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $37,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHEROES FOR CHILDREN — $35,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $30,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS PYTHIAN HOME INC — $21,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSM Wright Foundation — $20,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS CASA — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIFESAVERS FOUNDATION — $17,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGRANT-A-STARR FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 6y, 88% of budgetHERO COMMUNITY PROGRAM INC — $11,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION FOR FAMILY LITERACY INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STARR FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER
  • Who funds FAMILY GATEWAY INC
  • Who funds Salesmanship Club of Dallas
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE REFUGE FOR DMST
  • Who funds HOPE SUPPLY CO
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HEROES FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds TEXAS PYTHIAN HOME INC
  • Who funds SM Wright Foundation
  • Who funds DALLAS CASA
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC
  • Who funds LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GRANT-A-STARR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HERO COMMUNITY PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds THE BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION FOR FAMILY LITERACY INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC
  • Who funds Choose Mental Health
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS
  • Who funds THE STARR FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Moody Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · United Way Worldwide · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cherokee Crossroads Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 21%
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America21% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph