Skip to content

· Public charity

Charleston Area Medical Center Inc

Striving to provide the best health care to every patient, every day.

$4.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$202k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.4MEducation$1.1MArts & Culture$33kRecreation & Sports$16kPhilanthropy$16kHuman Services$10kYouth Development$10kCommunity Improvement$8k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $263,806, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,612,725 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,348,919 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $202k
$30,026
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WV HEALTH RIGHT INC$201,998
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA INC$30,026
WEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS HEALTH PROGRAM INC$25,000
PUTNAM COUNTY FAIR$6,782
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YWCA OF CHARLESTON: $10k → 18%HOSPICE CARE: $7k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 8 repeat orgs$394k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$3.3M
$394k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-6%

Still filing today

100%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +13%
  • BC
    Braxton County Memorial Hospital Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $276k · revenue +79%
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SO WV INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $225k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • BC
    BridgeValley Community and Technical College
    one grant, 2017 · $273k
  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $28k · revenue -17%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COALITION FOR WOMEN WITH HEART DISEASE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue -36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Virginia University Hospitals Inc

WVU Hospitals WVUH exists to provide a quality healthcare system, including tertiary services, to the citizens of WV and the surrounding region. Equally important, WVUH is committed by law and philosophy to be the primary clinical site for…

Health
2
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
3
West Virginia University Medical Corporation

To support the West Virginia University School of Medicine in the furtherance of its charitable, scientific, and educational purposes by serving as its faculty practice plan and providing a full range of business management services to its…

Health
4
Belmont Professional Associates Inc

To improve the communitys health through the efficient provision, coordination, and integration of quality health services, health education, and research. To provide compassionate, quality health services according to the spiritual,…

—
5
Jefferson Memorial Hospital

Jefferson Memorial Hospital is a non-profit critical access hospital serving the residents in the Eastern Panhandle of WV. It operates a 24/7 emergency room. Jefferson Memorial Hospital is organized to provide quality hospital patient care…

Health
6
Wetzel County Hospital Inc

Wetzel County Hospital is the provider of choice for the residents located in our primary and secondary service areas.

Health
7
Mcv Associated Physicians

The mission of the organization is to provide physicians and other healthcare professionals to support the needs of the community, as well as the academic mission of the vcu school of medicine.

Health
8
West Virginia State Medical Association

The west virginia state medical association is organized for the purpose of providing services to its members, who are all either physicians practicing in the state of west virginia or medical students. specifically, the association serves…

—
9
Charleston Area Medical Center Inc

Striving to provide the best health care to every patient, every day.

Health
10
Wellmont Medical Associates Inc

Honor those we serve by delivering the best possible care.Ballad Health is dedicated to improving the health of the 29-county Appalachian Highlands region.

Health
11
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
12
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia Health Right Inc; the most unlike its peers is Putnam County Fair Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
9/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC: $1,417,481 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INCBridgeValley Community and Technical College: $273,000 · OtherBridgeValley Community and Technical College+3 more: $45,500 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $1,124,155 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INCBraxton County Memorial Hospital Inc: $275,915 · HealthBraxton County Memoria…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SO WV INC: $225,489 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE …WEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS HEALTH PROGRAM INC: $155,000 · HealthWEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL …MARCH OF DIMES INC: $28,000 · Health+5 more: $52,500 · Health+5 moreYWCA OF CHARLESTON WEST VIRGINIA INC: $10,410 · Human ServicesKANAWHA HOSPICE CARE INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesPutnam County Fair Inc: $15,790 · Recreation & SportsUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA: $15,750 · PhilanthropyBUCKSKIN COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,735,981Education$1,124,155Health$736,904Human Services$17,410Recreation & Sports$15,790Philanthropy$15,750Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC: $1,417,481 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $1,124,155 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBraxton County Memorial Hospital Inc: $275,915 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SO WV INC: $225,489 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS HEALTH PROGRAM INC: $155,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE MALCOLM BALDRIGE NATIONAL QUALITY AWARD INC: $32,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $28,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPutnam County Fair Inc: $15,790 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA: $15,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL COALITION FOR WOMEN WITH HEART DISEASE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYWCA OF CHARLESTON WEST VIRGINIA INC: $10,410 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBUCKSKIN COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION OF MONONGALIA GENERAL HOSPITAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUTNAM COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $7,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANAWHA HOSPICE CARE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHCARE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF WEST VIRGINIA: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Tgkvf Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Bowles Rice Foundation · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charleston Area Medical Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charleston Area Medical Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charleston Area Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph