· Private foundation
Bowles Rice Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k28 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC | $48,000 |
| FOOD HELPERS DBA GREATER WASHINGTON COUNTY FOOD BANK | $12,000 |
| LEGAL AID OF WEST VIRGINIA INC | $10,170 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC | $5,000 |
| WVU AT PARKERSBURG FOUNDATION INC | $2,500 |
| THE MID-OHIO VALLEY SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC | $2,500 |
| UNITED WAY OF MONONGALIA AND PRESTON COUNTIES INC | $1,500 |
| WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| WASHINGTON AND JEFFERSON COLLEGE | $1,000 |
| FRIENDS OF HAPPY RETREAT INC | $1,000 |
| KIDS OF KANAWHA INC | $1,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $1,000 |
| BERKELEY COUNTY CONGREGATIONAL COOPERATIVE ACTION PROJECT INC | $1,000 |
| CASA OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE INC | $1,000 |
| BERKELEY COUNTY BACKPACK PROGRAM INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
41 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LALEGAL AID OF WEST VIRGINIA INC8× · 2018–2025 · $100k · revenue +50%
- WVWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC5× · 2018–2024 · $93k · revenue +16%
- DTDISCOVER THE REAL WEST VIRGINIA FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $28k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- WEWVMA EDUCATIONAL FUND INCone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +5%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITYone grant, 2018 · $15k
- MUMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATEDgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +284%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mountain state justice provides free legal services to low income people in west virginia and assures that low income people have access to the court system.
Communityworks in west virignia (cwwv) creates housing and community development solutions for all west virginians through a network of member organizations. cwwv carries out its mission by providing effective training and technical…
Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv
Improve the administration of justice and the provision of legal services for west virginia's citizens.
To foster, support, and assist in any research and economic development activities consistent with the educational objectives and mission of west virginia state university.
To improve the health and health care quality for the residents of west virginia.
Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.
Eastern West Virginia Community Action Agency serves the disadvantaged people by determining their needs; advocating for and providing programs that help remove them from the causes of poverty.
The west virginia chamber of commerce provides opportunities for broad based prosperity throughout west virginia.
Strengthening philanthropy in the mountain state.
Central west virginia community action association, inc.s mission is to provide pathways to economic independence for all families by leading community initiatives that address the root causes of poverty.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wvu At Parkersburg Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Orchardview Stables. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 126 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEGAL AID OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds DISCOVER THE REAL WEST VIRGINIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WVMA EDUCATIONAL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE EDUCATION ALLIANCE-BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds WVU AT PARKERSBURG FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds IGNITE A BETTER WORLD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CANONSBURG EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF CHARLESTON WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD HELPERS ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONONGALIA COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF MONONGALIA AND PRESTON COUNITES INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF THE PANHANDLE INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON CITY MISSION ↗
- Who funds EASTERN WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds HORSES WITH HEARTS INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE INC ↗
- Who funds Animal Friends Inc ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT LEGAL AID ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc) · Eqt Foundation · Eastern West Virginia Community Foundation · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · United Way of the Eastern Panhandle · Firstenergy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bowles Rice Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.