Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles H & Bertha L Boothroyd Foundation Co Thomas C Kaufmann

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$456k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$1.1MHuman Services$395kCrime & Legal$125kHealth$110kYouth Development$77kHousing & Shelter$62kArts & Culture$49kInternational$49kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $230k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE CHIC$90,000
U OF IL COLLEGE OF NURSING$58,000
EVANS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$52,000
GOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION$45,000
CHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICE$29,000
ST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREP$25,000
SAN MIGUEL SCHOOL$19,000
PROVIDENCE ST MEL SCHOOL$17,000
DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND$17,000
WATTS OF LOVE$15,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$15,000
H O M E$14,000
BEAT THE STREETS-CHICAGO$12,000
DEPAUL COLLEGE PREP$12,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS FOR AFFORDABLE H$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BETHEL NEW LIFE: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 21 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -60% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
1

Total granted

$2.0M
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-60%

Still filing today

57%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $225k · revenue +48%
  • GA
    GOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING
    5× · 2021–2025 · $221k · revenue +93%
  • PS
    Providence St Mel School
    5× · 2021–2025 · $78k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • BN
    BETHEL NEW LIFE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
2
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
3
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
4
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
7
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
10
Students Run Chicago
Health
11
Academy for Global Citizenship Charter School

Academy for global citizenship charter school (agc) develops mindful leaders who take action both now and in the future to positively impact their communities and the world beyond.

Education
12
The Chicago Scholars Foundation

Chicago scholars is transforming the leadership landscape of our city by resolving the fundamental barriers to success for academically driven, first generation college students from under-resourced communities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Daniel Murphy Scholarship Fund; the most unlike its peers is Watts of Love. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE CHIC: $387,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE CHICU OF IL COLLEGE OF NURSING: $250,000 · OtherU OF IL COLLEGE OF NURSINGGOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING: $221,000 · OtherGOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHINGST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREP: $132,000 · OtherST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREPProvidence St Mel School: $78,000 · OtherCHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICE: $77,000 · OtherDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $74,000 · OtherHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MAINTENANCE FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $62,000 · Other+6 more: $186,500 · Other+6 moreEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $225,000 · EducationEVANS SCHOLARS FOU…SAN MIGUEL FEBRES CORDERO SCHOOL INC: $77,500 · EducationSAN MIGUEL FEBRES …THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $32,000 · EducationTHE NEWBERRY LIBRA…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $67,000 · HealthWATTS OF LOVE: $49,000 · InternationalGreater Chicago Legal Clinic: $48,000 · Crime & LegalBEAT THE STREETS CHICAGO: $46,000 · Youth DevelopmentBETHEL NEW LIFE INC: $7,500 · Human Services
Other$1,467,500Education$334,500Health$67,000International$49,000Crime & Legal$48,000Youth Development$46,000Human Services$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $225,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING: $221,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetProvidence St Mel School: $78,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSAN MIGUEL FEBRES CORDERO SCHOOL INC: $77,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $74,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $67,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MAINTENANCE FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $62,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetWATTS OF LOVE: $49,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetGreater Chicago Legal Clinic: $48,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBEAT THE STREETS CHICAGO: $46,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $32,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE IGNITES CHICAGO: $31,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING ↗
  • Who funds Providence St Mel School ↗
  • Who funds SAN MIGUEL FEBRES CORDERO SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MAINTENANCE FOR THE ELDERLY INC ↗
  • Who funds WATTS OF LOVE ↗
  • Who funds Greater Chicago Legal Clinic ↗
  • Who funds BEAT THE STREETS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds BETHEL NEW LIFE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL19.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · AbbVie Foundation · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · Helen V Brach Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles H & Bertha L Boothroyd Foundation Co Thomas C Kaufmann funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles H & Bertha L Boothroyd Foundation Co Thomas C Kaufmann. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles H & Bertha L Boothroyd Foundation Co Thomas C Kaufmann’s filings →

    More from the funding graph