Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Charles and Catherine B Rice Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Religion$72kHealth$40kInternational$38kEducation$14kAnimals$11kRecreation & Sports$11kPhilanthropy$8kPublic Benefit$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$239k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REVIVAL 356 MINISTRIES INC$3,000
GIRLS ON THE RUN$1,000
FELLOWSHIP CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$1,000
EMORY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $250 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200 → 14%SENIOR SERVICES OF NORTH FULTON INC: $1k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%ATLANTA MISSION: $250 → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
CA
WV
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$254k · 15 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
34

Total granted

$254k
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+25%

Still filing today

87%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationReligionAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HUNGARIAN-AMERICAN COALITION
    4× · 2017–2022 · $38k · revenue +232%
  • R3
    REVIVAL 356 MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $18k · revenue +22%
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $37k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • FP
    FRIENDSHIP PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
Alliance for Aging Research

The alliance for aging research is the leading nonprofit organization dedicated to changing the narrative to achieve healthy aging and equitable access to care.

—
4
The American Neurological Association

Advancing science, education, and careers to improve neurologic health for all.

Health
5
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
6
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
7
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
8
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
9
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation

To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…

Health
10
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
11
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
12
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hungarian-American Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEducation Equity LeadershipSubstance Abuse TreatmentIndependent K-8 SchoolsWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Jewish Community FederationsFallen First Responder Supp…Veteran Support ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…Homeless Services & ShelterGovernment Accountability R…Senior Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Classical Music EnsemblesCommunity Health CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionChristian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%3%<5yr17%3%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr14%30%20–35yr9%33%35–55yr13%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%12%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr14%48%20–35yr9%21%35–55yr13%11%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/38
the rest of the field
19%
10,946/58,263

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
28/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $123,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $36,762 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH — $25,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHFRIENDSHIP PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $10,000 · Other+25 more — $35,150 · Other+25 moreHUNGARIAN-AMERICAN COALITION — $38,000 · InternationalHUNGARIAN-A…REVIVAL 356 MINISTRIES INC — $18,000 · ReligionREVIVAL 35…CITY OF REFUGE — $12,000 · ReligionCITY OF RE…MISSION HOPE — $4,000 · ReligionMISSION HO…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $13,500 · HealthCure Childhood Cancer Inc — $7,800 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $2,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 · HealthAcoustic Neuroma Association — $1,000 · Health+4 more — $2,550 · HealthFELLOWSHIP CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $11,800 · EducationEMORY GROUP RETURN — $2,500 · EducationSigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation — $1,000 · EducationYOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE — $1,000 · EducationAmerican Junior Golf Association Inc — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsYOSEMITE FOUNDATION — $500 · Recreation & SportsLeadership Institute — $6,000 · Public BenefitDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION — $500 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $500 · Public Benefit
Other$230,412International$38,000Religion$34,000Health$28,350Education$16,300Recreation & Sports$10,500Public Benefit$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHUNGARIAN-AMERICAN COALITION — $38,000 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetREVIVAL 356 MINISTRIES INC — $18,000 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $13,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $11,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Junior Golf Association Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCure Childhood Cancer Inc — $7,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLeadership Institute — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Extension Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION HOPE — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFixGeorgiaPets Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEMORY GROUP RETURN — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVICTIMS OF COMMUNISM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNoah's Ark Animal Rehabilitation Center and Sanctuary Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAcoustic Neuroma Association — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES NORTH FULTON INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH ORCHESTRA OF GREATER COLUMBUS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLaw Enforcement Legal Defense Fund — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASHIERS HIGHLANDS HUMANE SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…The Billi Marcus Foun…Georgia Power Foundat…Natl Christian Charit…Morgan Stanley Global…Verizon FoundationRenaissance Charitabl…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Raymond James Charita…The Pfizer Foundation…Donor Advised Charita…
The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Billi Marcus Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Verizon Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Charles and Catherine B Rice Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines