Skip to content
Charity Polo Classic Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Charity Polo Classic Inc

Planning and hosting polo events to raise funds for local, state and national nonprofit organizations 501 c 3.

$559k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.3MHuman Services$1.1MYouth Development$739kAnimals$38kArts & Culture$24kRecreation & Sports$20kFood & Nutrition$19k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $153k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $407k
$66,288
Median grant
1
States reached
$131k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLOTHES TO KIDS$140,250
CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER$100,000
BIG BROTHER BIG SISTER$100,000
PAY IT FORWARD$66,288
MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND$45,000
WHEELCHAIRS 4 KIDS$42,075
PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS$42,075
GASPERILLA MUSIC FOUNDATION$23,768
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $144k → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $140k → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $114k → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $93k → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $76k → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $70k → 12%JACKSON IN ACTION 83 FUNDATION: $17k → 13%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $40k → 12%JACKSON IN ACTION 83 FUNDATION: $10k → 13%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $34k → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $20k → 12%WHEELCHAIRS 4 KIDS: $43k → 12%WHEELCHAIRS 4 KIDS: $42k → 12%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $47k → 13%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $45k → 13%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $45k → 13%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $45k → 13%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $38k → 13%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $35k → 13%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $27k → 13%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $23k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 10 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +142% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$3.1M
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+142%
+37%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthAnimalsPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $967k · revenue +154%
  • CT
    CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $731k · revenue +142%
  • BB
    Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America
    7× · 2019–2025 · $545k · revenue +311%

Funded once

  • CC
    COPPERHEAD CHARITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +34%
  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $19k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Children- Tampa Bay Inc

Friends of the children tampa bay has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Human Services
2
Heart Gallery of Tampa Inc

Through photographic exhibits, the Heart Gallery of Tampa introduces our community to foster children awaiting adoptive families. We provide a platform to inspire our community to improve their quality of life and connect them with Forever…

Human Services
3
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
4
Boys & Girls Club of Tampa Bay Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
5
Children's Dream Fund Inc

The sole mission of the children's dream fund inc. is to make dreams come true for children with life threatening illnesses living in west central florida, and to provide lasting memories for the children and families.

—
6
The South Florida Charity Classic
Human Services
7
Celebrities Fore Kids Inc

The organization's mission is to make a difference in the lives of children affected by cancer and other life-threatening illnesses. we strive to improve the quality of life and well-being for them and their families by offering financial…

Human Services
8
Tampabay-Job-Links Inc
—
9
Tampa Bay Sports Commission Inc

Our mission is to generate social and economic impact throughout the tampa bay region by attracting, promoting and/or organizing youth and amateur sporting events and initiatives.

Recreation & Sports
10
Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children

Provides college scholarships and mentoring programs for deserving low-income children whose household income falls below 185% of the federal poverty guidelines from middle school through college.

Crime & Legal
11
The Arc Tampa Bay Foundation Inc

To secure the financial future of services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities served by the arc tampa bay, inc. (continued on schedule o)this mission is accomplished through a comprehensive plan of building…

Human Services
12
Frameworks of Tampa Bay Inc

To equip every child in tampa bay with the knowledge and know-how to become kind, collaborative and capable citizens.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pay It Forward Fertility Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC: $731,317 · Human ServicesCLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INCMORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $303,978 · Human ServicesMORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND MORG…Wheelchairs 4 Kids Inc: $85,326 · Human ServicesWheelchairs 4 Kids Inc+1 more: $27,229 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC: $967,060 · HealthCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INCBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America: $545,428 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters Of…PAY IT FORWARD FERTILITY FOUNDATION: $240,555 · OtherPAY IT FORWARD FERTILITY FO…RYAN NECE FOUNDATION INC: $107,975 · Youth DevelopmentPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $85,326 · Youth DevelopmentHumane Society of Tampa Bay Inc: $37,756 · AnimalsGASPARILLA MUSIC FOUNDATION INC: $23,768 · Arts & CultureCOPPERHEAD CHARITIES INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $18,875 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$1,147,850Health$967,060Other$785,983Youth Development$193,301Animals$37,756Arts & Culture$23,768Philanthropy$20,000Food & Nutrition$18,875

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC: $967,060 over 8y, 8.0% of budgetCLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC: $731,317 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America: $545,428 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $303,978 over 8y, 23% of budgetPAY IT FORWARD FERTILITY FOUNDATION: $240,555 over 3y, 30% of budgetRYAN NECE FOUNDATION INC: $107,975 over 3y, 28% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $85,326 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWheelchairs 4 Kids Inc: $85,326 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHumane Society of Tampa Bay Inc: $37,756 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJACKSON IN ACTION 83 FOUNDATION INC: $27,229 over 2y, 14% of budgetGASPARILLA MUSIC FOUNDATION INC: $23,768 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCOPPERHEAD CHARITIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $18,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vinik Family Foundati…Enterprise Holdings F…Suncoast Credit Union…Debartolo Family Foun…Network for GoodNatl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vinik Family FoundationFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vinik Family Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charity Polo Classic Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charity Polo Classic Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America: 0% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charity Polo Classic’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home