Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Charity Polo Classic Inc

Planning and hosting polo events to raise funds for local, state and national nonprofit organizations 501 c 3.

$559k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.3MHuman Services$1.1MYouth Development$739kAnimals$38kArts & Culture$24kRecreation & Sports$20kFood & Nutrition$19k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $153k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $407k
$66,288
Median grant
1
States reached
$131k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLOTHES TO KIDS$140,250
CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER$100,000
BIG BROTHER BIG SISTER$100,000
PAY IT FORWARD$66,288
MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND$45,000
PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS$42,075
WHEELCHAIRS 4 KIDS$42,075
GASPERILLA MUSIC FOUNDATION$23,768
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $144k → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $140k → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $114k → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $93k → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $76k → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $70k → 12%JACKSON IN ACTION 83 FUNDATION: $17k → 13%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $40k → 12%JACKSON IN ACTION 83 FUNDATION: $10k → 13%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $34k → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS: $20k → 12%WHEELCHAIRS 4 KIDS: $43k → 12%WHEELCHAIRS 4 KIDS: $42k → 12%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $47k → 13%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $45k → 13%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $45k → 13%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $45k → 13%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $38k → 13%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $35k → 13%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $27k → 13%MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND: $23k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 10 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +142% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$3.1M
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+142%
+37%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthAnimalsPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $967k · revenue +154%
  • CT
    CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $731k · revenue +142%
  • BB
    Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America
    7× · 2019–2025 · $545k · revenue +311%

Funded once

  • CC
    COPPERHEAD CHARITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +34%
  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $19k · revenue +37%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Children- Tampa Bay Inc

Friends of the children tampa bay has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Human Services
2
Tampa Bay Partnership Inc

The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.

3
Heart Gallery of Tampa Inc

Through photographic exhibits, the Heart Gallery of Tampa introduces our community to foster children awaiting adoptive families. We provide a platform to inspire our community to improve their quality of life and connect them with Forever…

Human Services
4
The Arc Tampa Bay Foundation Inc

To secure the financial future of services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities served by the arc tampa bay, inc. (continued on schedule o)this mission is accomplished through a comprehensive plan of building…

Human Services
5
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
6
The South Florida Charity Classic
Human Services
7
Celebrities Fore Kids Inc

The organization's mission is to make a difference in the lives of children affected by cancer and other life-threatening illnesses. we strive to improve the quality of life and well-being for them and their families by offering financial…

Human Services
8
Tampabay-Job-Links Inc
9
Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children

Provides college scholarships and mentoring programs for deserving low-income children whose household income falls below 185% of the federal poverty guidelines from middle school through college.

Crime & Legal
10
Success 4 Kids and Families Inc

Success 4 kids & families provides quality care coordination through innovative mental wellness and educational services to strengthen and empower individuals and families.

11
Frameworks of Tampa Bay Inc

To equip every child in tampa bay with the knowledge and know-how to become kind, collaborative and capable citizens.

Youth Development
12
Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

To support the greater tampa chamber of commerce through leadership and educational programs.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pay It Forward Fertility Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC — $731,317 · Human ServicesCLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INCMORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND — $303,978 · Human ServicesMORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND MORG…Wheelchairs 4 Kids Inc — $85,326 · Human ServicesWheelchairs 4 Kids Inc+1 more — $27,229 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC — $967,060 · HealthCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INCBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America — $545,428 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters Of…PAY IT FORWARD FERTILITY FOUNDATION — $240,555 · OtherPAY IT FORWARD FERTILITY FO…RYAN NECE FOUNDATION INC — $107,975 · Youth DevelopmentPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC — $85,326 · Youth DevelopmentHumane Society of Tampa Bay Inc — $37,756 · AnimalsGASPARILLA MUSIC FOUNDATION INC — $23,768 · Arts & CultureCOPPERHEAD CHARITIES INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC — $18,875 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$1,147,850Health$967,060Other$785,983Youth Development$193,301Animals$37,756Arts & Culture$23,768Philanthropy$20,000Food & Nutrition$18,875

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC — $967,060 over 8y, 8.0% of budgetCLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC — $731,317 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America — $545,428 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND MORGAN AUTO GROUP HELPING HAND FUND — $303,978 over 8y, 23% of budgetPAY IT FORWARD FERTILITY FOUNDATION — $240,555 over 3y, 30% of budgetRYAN NECE FOUNDATION INC — $107,975 over 3y, 28% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC — $85,326 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWheelchairs 4 Kids Inc — $85,326 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHumane Society of Tampa Bay Inc — $37,756 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJACKSON IN ACTION 83 FOUNDATION INC — $27,229 over 2y, 14% of budgetGASPARILLA MUSIC FOUNDATION INC — $23,768 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCOPPERHEAD CHARITIES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC — $18,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vinik Family FoundationFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vinik Family Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Charity Polo Classic Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc0% of income from government
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America0% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph