Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chapin-May Foundation of Illinois (42-50477)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$175k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$170kEnvironment$140kArts & Culture$125kHuman Services$103kFood & Nutrition$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kReligion$100kYouth Development$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EXPERIMENTAL STATION$20,000
NEW MT CALVERY MB$20,000
CATHOLIC THEOLOGICAL UNION$15,000
SOUTH SHORE DRILL TEAM$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
FRANCISCAN OUTREACH$15,000
SISTER HOUSE$15,000
PROJECT VISION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION$10,000
CHICAGO HOPES FOR KIDS$10,000
PACIFIC GARDEN MISSION$10,000
YMCA OF METROPOLITAN OF CHICAGO$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SISTER HOUSE: $15k → 14%SISTER HOUSE: $15k → 14%SISTER HOUSE: $15k → 14%SISTER HOUSE: $15k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%SISTER HOUSE: $15k → 14%SISTER HOUSE: $10k → 14%SISTER HOUSE: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 16 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$1.2M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+127%

Still filing today

38%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    THE EXPERIMENTAL STATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $125k · revenue +86%
  • FO
    FRANCISCAN OUTREACH
    7× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +101%
  • S
    SISTERHOUSE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $93k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • LC
    LA CASA NORTEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +127%
  • SL
    St Leonard's Ministriesgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness

Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness (CCH) builds community power and advances racial equity through organizing, advocacy, legal assistance, and education to prevent and end homelessness because housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
2
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
3
Live Free Chicago

Live Free Illinois is a statewide organization partnering with over 120 congregations and directly impacted individuals to build safer more equitable communities across Illinois. Operating at the intersection of criminal justice reform and…

—
4
Erie Neighborhood House

Erie neighborhood house provides the most comprehensive support to immigrant and low-income families in chicago. our mission is to empower our communitylatinx immigrants alongside individuals and families of all backgroundsthrough…

Human Services
5
Covenant House Chicago
—
6
Students Run Chicago
Health
7
House of the Good Shepherd

House of Good Shepherd serves with love and compassion women and children affected by domestic violence by offering a safe place with opportunities for emotional, educational and spiritual growth, giving hope and continued support for a…

Human Services
8
Onward Neighborhood House

We open doors to improve lives and uplift communities through educational, economic and support services.

—
9
Illinois Community for Displaced Immigrants

Serving recently arrived migrants and asylum seekers in the Chicagoland area and is committed to upholding the dignity and human rights of immigrants.

Human Services
10
You Can Make It

Providing interim housing for men, women and children, social services, homeless services, emergency shelter, and housing in chicago community for the homeless, poor and disadvantaged.

Human Services
11
Chicago Dream Center

Chicago Dream Centers mission is to REACH our community ONE person at a time by connecting them to resources that lead toward overcoming poverty, addiction, homelessness, human trafficking and hunger.

—
12
Collective Chicago

To disrupt cycles of poverty with dignified transitional housing that hoslistically connects young men to opportunities that create and sustain personal, professional and relational growth.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for; the most unlike its peers is Project Vision Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW MT CALVERY MB: $140,000 · OtherNEW MT CALVERY MBFRANCISCAN OUTREACH: $105,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN OUTREACHPACIFIC GARDEN MISSION: $100,000 · OtherPACIFIC GARDEN MISSIONSOUTH SHORE DRILL TEAM: $100,000 · OtherSOUTH SHORE DRILL TEAMIndividual grant recipient: $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $85,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN: $75,000 · OtherYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIANIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherLAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · Other+3 more: $40,000 · OtherTHE EXPERIMENTAL STATION: $125,000 · Community ImprovementTHE EXPERIM…SISTERHOUSE: $92,500 · Human ServicesSISTERHOU…The YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $10,000 · Human ServicesThe YMCA …Chicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for: $45,000 · EducationLawndale Educational and Regional Network Charter School: $10,000 · EducationPROJECT VISION INC: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentLA CASA NORTE: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterSt Leonard's Ministries: $5,000 · Religion
Other$895,000Community Improvement$125,000Human Services$102,500Education$55,000Youth Development$45,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE EXPERIMENTAL STATION: $125,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetFRANCISCAN OUTREACH: $105,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSISTERHOUSE: $92,500 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetPROJECT VISION INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetChicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for: $45,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetLA CASA NORTE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLawndale Educational and Regional Network Charter School: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Leonard's Ministries: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE EXPERIMENTAL STATION ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds SISTERHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for ↗
  • Who funds LA CASA NORTE ↗
  • Who funds Lawndale Educational and Regional Network Charter School ↗
  • Who funds The YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
  • Who funds St Leonard's Ministries ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL18.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Helen V Brach Foundation · WP & HB White Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · AbbVie Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chapin-May Foundation of Illinois (42-50477) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chapin-May Foundation of Illinois (42-50477). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chapin-May Foundation of Illinois (42-50477)’s filings →

    More from the funding graph