Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chapels of Colorado

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$44kArts & Culture$15kHealth$5kEducation$5kYouth Development$1kHuman Services$1kFood & Nutrition$1kPhilanthropy$850Other$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
3
States reached
$102k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MINDFUL PROJECT$1,000
LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY$1,000
BROADMOOR COURT ASSISTED LIVING$1,000
ST PAUL'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$800
FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION$100
OPERA THEATRE OF THE ROCKIES$100
Individual grant recipient$100
BEAKTHROUGH T1D$100
MILIBO ART THEATER$100
COLORADO SPRINGS PHILHARMONIC$100
RMFI$100
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WOMEN'S FILM$100
COLORADO VOCAL ARTS ENSEMBLE$100
NAMI COLORADO SPRINGS$100
COLORADO SPRINGS CONSERVATORY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $100 → 9%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $100 → 9%FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$50k · 22 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
14

Total granted

$50k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+31%

Still filing today

27%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    Colorado Vocal Arts Ensemble
    6× · 2017–2025 · $1k · revenue +4%
  • CS
    COLORADO SPRINGS CONSERVATORY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2025 · $550 · revenue +80%
  • RM
    Rocky Mountain Field Institute Inc
    2× · 2021–2023 · $350 · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • SH
    SACRED HEART CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • SH
    SACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • SA
    ST AMBROSE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Colorado Parks Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports
2
Colorado Jazz Ambassadors
Arts & Culture
3
Colorado Business Committee for the Arts

Colorado business committee for the arts (cbca)s mission is to advance colorados creative economy by connecting business and arts. we accomplish this mission through statewide advocacy, research, training, volunteerism and arts engagement…

Arts & Culture
4
Colorado Ag Water Alliance

Works with farmers and ranchers to address water issues around the state impacting agriculture.

Environment
5
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
6
Boulder Mountainbike Alliance

The Boulder Mountainbike Alliance exists to serve as a positive voice for mountain biking in the greater Boulder County, Colorado area by improving the trail experience for all users through social rides and events, advocacy, and trail…

Recreation & Sports
7
Boulder Philharmonic Orchestra

The mission of the boulder philharmonic orchestra is to enrich connections and communities through the power of orchestral music. the boulder philharmonic orchestra presents performances that reflect our community's values, creativity, and…

Arts & Culture
8
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
9
Boulder Chorale

To enrich and inspire a broad community through music.

Arts & Culture
10
Building a Better Colorado

To conduct research, promote community engagement, and provide an amalgamation of information to the citizens of colorado.

Community Improvement
11
Boulder Suzuki Strings

Provide top quality Suzuki Method string instruction to children of all ages, educate parents in their role as a music educator and parent, foster continuing education of faculty associated with Boulder Suzuki Strings, provide financial…

Education
12
The Colorado Trail Foundation

To provide, improve, and maintain, through voluntary public involvement and in cooperation with the USDA Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management, a linear, non-motorized, sustainable, scenic, recreation trail corridor for hikers,…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Springs Conservatory Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Paul's Catholic Church: $21,233 · OtherSt Paul's Catholic ChurchSCARED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCH: $7,025 · OtherSCARED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCHSACRED HEART CHURCH: $6,100 · OtherSACRED HEART CHURCHSACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCH: $5,800 · OtherSACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCHST PAUL'S CATHOLIC CHURC: $3,368 · OtherST PAUL'S CATHOLIC CHURC+28 more: $19,308 · Other+28 moreST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationOpera Theatre of the Rockies: $2,400 · Arts & CultureColorado Vocal Arts Ensemble: $1,250 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO SPRINGS CONSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $550 · Arts & CultureMANITOU ART THEATRE: $250 · Arts & CultureBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,800 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $250 · HealthBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC: $500 · Youth DevelopmentFOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $300 · Human ServicesTrails and Open Space Coalition: $100 · Civil RightsWILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $100 · Recreation & Sports
Other$62,834Education$5,000Arts & Culture$4,450Health$3,050Youth Development$500Human Services$300Civil Rights$100Recreation & Sports$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOpera Theatre of the Rockies: $2,400 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetColorado Vocal Arts Ensemble: $1,250 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS CONSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRocky Mountain Field Institute Inc: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANITOU ART THEATRE: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTrails and Open Space Coalition: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Opera Theatre of the Rockies ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Vocal Arts Ensemble ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO SPRINGS CONSERVATORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Field Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds MANITOU ART THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds Trails and Open Space Coalition ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El Pomar FoundationCO23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El Pomar Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · Bee Vradenburg Foundation · The Denver Foundation · H Chase Stone Trust B Xxxxx5009 · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chapels of Colorado funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chapels of Colorado. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chapels of Colorado’s filings →

    More from the funding graph