Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Chao Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$288k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.7MPhilanthropy$496kHealth$138kCivil Rights$100kYouth Development$78kHuman Services$76kCrime & Legal$74kReligion$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $208k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$52,000
RENEWAL FOUNDATION INC$30,000
ASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$26,000
MISSOURI S&T$25,000
FIRST STAR INC$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION$22,000
ARCADIA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$15,000
MPAK INC$15,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS$10,000
WAYMAKERS$10,000
WAYMAKERS$10,000
DETERMINED TO SUCCEED$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION$10,000
PEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$7,500
ASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $2k → 8%MPAK INC: $15k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $250 → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $2k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $2k → 8%FREEFORM: $5k → 14%FIRST STAR INC: $35k → 14%FIRST STAR INC: $25k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH: $515 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
OH
CA
CO
MO
DC
HI
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of Chao Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Chao Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 20 repeat orgs$192k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
21

Total granted

$2.2M
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+30%

Still filing today

60%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthAnimalsCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +55%
  • TM
    THE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN
    7× · 2018–2024 · $100k · revenue +60%
  • W
    WAYMAKERS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • W(
    WAYFINDERS (FKA COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS)
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • HO
    HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue +30%
  • CF
    CHOC FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +53%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
2
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

3
California Community Foundation

We invest in, partner with, and amplify the community to build a good life.

Philanthropy
4
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
5
All for Kids Organization

This year, all for kids provided 70,000 at-risk children and parents living in los angeles and orange counties with services that include school readiness, parenting classes, family resource centers, support groups, mental health…

Human Services
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
California Children and Families Foundation Inc

The mission of the california children and families foundation is to promote, support, and improve the health and early development of children, from the prenatal stage through five years of age.

Human Services
8
California Healthcare Foundation

Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…

9
Catalyst Family Inc

At catalyst family, inc., we believe that strong families build strong communities. we are committed to nurturing vibrant communities where children thrive and families succeed, creating lasting change.

Education
10
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

11
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
12
Communities in Schools of Los Angeles Inc

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. we work with public school systems, establishing relationship with superintendents, principals, educators, and community partners to…

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Partners and the most unlike its peers is Jeremy Lin Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUnion Labor OrganizationsLaw Enforcement and Fire Re…Planned Community Associati…Native Hawaiian Cultural Or…Dog Rescue and AdoptionCommunity Arts Education & …Service Clubs & Youth Organ…Youth Sports Leagues
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr16%15%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr17%33%20–35yr11%12%35–55yr13%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr11%5%35–55yr13%59%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
15%
12,746/86,997

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION — $1,207,687 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATIONTHE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN — $100,000 · EducationTHE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN+5 more — $37,875 · EducationASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $427,600 · OtherASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND OF SOUTHERN …RENEWAL FOUNDATION — $207,000 · OtherRENEWAL FOUNDATIONMISSOURI S&T — $110,000 · OtherMISSOURI S&TMISSOURI UNIVERSITY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY — $60,000 · OtherMISSOURI UNIVERSITY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY+28 more — $232,000 · Other+28 moreASIAN AMERICAN FUTURES — $100,000 · PhilanthropyJeremy Lin Foundation — $50,000 · PhilanthropyMAUI UNITED WAY — $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $3,750 · PhilanthropyFIRST STAR INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesMPAK INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION MARIN — $5,750 · Human ServicesFreefrom — $5,000 · Human Services+1 more — $515 · Human ServicesWAYMAKERS — $70,000 · Crime & LegalAMERICA ON TRACK — $3,750 · Crime & LegalAtaxia Telangiectasia Children's Project Inc — $66,000 · Science & TechPANDAS INTERNATIONAL — $21,200 · AnimalsTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION — $10,002 · AnimalsSHANNON ELIZABETH FOUNDATION — $2,250 · Animals
Education$1,345,562Other$1,036,600Philanthropy$163,750Human Services$86,265Crime & Legal$73,750Science & Tech$66,000Animals$33,452

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION — $1,207,687 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $427,600 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN FUTURES — $100,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetTHE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN — $100,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWAYMAKERS — $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAtaxia Telangiectasia Children's Project Inc — $66,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFIRST STAR INC — $60,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetJeremy Lin Foundation — $50,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetPEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $32,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPANDAS INTERNATIONAL — $21,200 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $18,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICE CENTER INC — $17,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetARCADIA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION — $10,002 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI UNITED WAY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDetermined to Succeed — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION MARIN — $5,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFreefrom — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICA ON TRACK — $3,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUNSAR MAYA INC — $3,750 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSHANNON ELIZABETH FOUNDATION — $2,250 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetPACIFIC ACADEMY PTO — $1,875 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF BROADWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC — $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARE RESCUE LA — $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN FUTURES
  • Who funds THE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN
  • Who funds WAYMAKERS
  • Who funds Ataxia Telangiectasia Children's Project Inc
  • Who funds FIRST STAR INC
  • Who funds Jeremy Lin Foundation
  • Who funds PEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PANDAS INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICE CENTER INC
  • Who funds MPAK INC
  • Who funds ARCADIA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS
  • Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MAUI UNITED WAY
  • Who funds Determined to Succeed
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY
  • Who funds Freefrom
  • Who funds BUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA16.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · AbbVie Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Chao Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chao Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Chao Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph