· Private foundation
Champagne Family Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $400k
- $250k+1 grant · $333k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MIA RAYS SQUADRON | $333,000 |
| POST 404 AMERICAN LEGION | $200,000 |
| MARCO ISLAND YOUTH BASEBALL | $200,000 |
| MARCO ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $23,100 |
| MARCO DEMENTIA RESPITE | $10,000 |
| MARCO ISLAND DISCOVERY CENTER | $10,000 |
| MARCO ISLAND BOXING CLUB | $5,300 |
| MARCO ISLAND ROTARY CLUB | $5,000 |
| MARCO ISLAND CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $5,000 |
| NCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER CO | $5,000 |
| MARCO ISLAND FIRE RESCUE FOUNDATION | $1,095 |
| THE F-TROOP FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| SAN MARCO KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $411k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MIMARCO ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $683k · revenue +14% · 27% of their budget
- MIMARCO ISLAND ACADEMY A PUBLIC CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL7× · 2017–2023 · $289k · revenue +108%
- MDMarco Dementia Respite MDR Inc3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- MIMARCO ISLAND COMMUNITY PARKS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $19k · revenue -94%
- SDSAINT DOMINIC ACADEMYone grant, 2020 · $10k
- MIMASSCHALLENGE INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To bind its members together by a common objective to provide leisure and recreation.
The Foundation is organized to develop, produce, and support programs relating to recreational boating and our marine environment.
Provide college scholarships and make charitable contributions to local charities.
To provide an educational program with enhanced scholastic momentum with a continuing commitment to high academic standards and community development.
Charitable endeavors in the community.
The mission of the marine resources council (mrc) is to maintain and enhance the quality of marine systems for the economic, recreational, aesthetic, and environmental use for the people of florida
The Marco Police Foundation's mission is to assist officers and employees of the Marco Island Police Department in emergency financial situations and maintains a scholarship fund for the officers and their children.
Marisa's mission, inc. provides support to patients and families affected by the challenges of cancer. the goal of marisa's mission is to keep marisa's spirit alive, lead by her example and give anyone going through a difficult journey the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mia Rays Squadron Inc and the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MIA RAYS SQUADRON INC ↗
- Who funds MARCO ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds MARCO ISLAND ACADEMY A PUBLIC CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Marco Dementia Respite MDR Inc ↗
- Who funds WARRIORS HOMES OF COLLIER INC ↗
- Who funds MARCO ISLAND COMMUNITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds MASSCHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds Rotary Club of Marco Island Inc ↗
- Who funds OUR DAILY BREAD FOOD PANTRY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds YELLOW RIBBON FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Marco Island Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds THE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Island Country Club Charitable Foundation · The Aldo and Mary Pat Palombo Trust Foundation Inc · Bremer Family Foundation · Collier Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Champagne Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Masschallenge Inc — 3% of income from government
- Yellow Ribbon Fund Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.