Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chamiza Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$206k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$606kEducation$228kPublic Safety & Disaster$145kEnvironment$137kFood & Nutrition$101kReligion$73kYouth Development$48kHealth$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $187k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KERES CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
PACHAMAMAS PATH$15,000
SANTA CLARA PUEBLO$15,000
PARTNERS IN EDUCATION$15,000
INDIAN PUEBLO CULTURAL CENTER$15,000
TAOS PUEBLO WARCHIEFS OFFICE$15,000
TREES WATER PEOPLE$15,000
CONSERVATION LEGACY ANCESTRAL LANDS$15,000
TAOS PUEBLO CMS$15,000
OHKAY OWINGEH SENIOR CENTER$14,595
OO-OO-NAH ART CULTRUAL CENTER$12,540
POEH MUSEUM CULTURAL CENTER$10,000
SANTA ANA PUEBLO$8,500
SANTA CLARA PUEBLO$5,480
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PUEBLO OF SAN FELIPE: $15k → 10%CONSERVATION LEGACY ANCESTRAL LAND: $15k → 14%LANL FOUNDATION: $15k → 18%TAOS PUEBLO WARCHIEFS OFFICE: $15k → 18%LAGUNA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12k → 30%ANCESTRAL RICH TREASURES OF ZUNI: $25k → 32%PACHAMAMAS PATH: $13k → 11%TREES WATER PEOPLE: $15k → 11%CONSERVATION LEGACY ANCESTRAL LANDS: $12k → 12%SAN FELIPE PUEBLO: $12k → 10%CONSERVATION LEGACY ANCESTRAL LANDS: $15k → 14%SANTA CLARA PUEBLO: $15k → 18%TAOS PUEBLO CMS: $15k → 18%PUEBLO OF LAGUNA UTILITY AUTHORITY: $12k → 30%ZUNI YOUTH ENRICHMENT PROG: $15k → 32%TREES WATER PEOPLE: $12k → 11%SAN FELIPE PUEBLO: $12k → 10%CONSERVATION LEGACY ANCESTRAL LANDS: $12k → 14%GENERATIONAL EMPOWERMENT: $12k → 18%PACHAMAMAS PATH: $15k → 18%ACOMA PUEBLO: $18k → 30%ZUNI YOUTH ENRICHMENT PROG: $15k → 32%SANTO DOMINGO PUEBLO: $31k → 12%OO-OO-NAH ART CULTRUAL CENTER: $13k → 18%ZUNI YOUTH ENRICHMENT PROJECT: $12k → 32%KERES CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER: $16k → 10%SANTO DOMINGO PUEBLO: $31k → 12%INDIAN PUEBLO CULTURAL CENTER: $24k → 14%TAOS PUEBLO CMS: $12k → 18%ACOMA PUEBLO: $12k → 30%ZUNI YOUTH ENRICHMENT PROJECT: $12k → 32%KERES CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER: $15k → 10%INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE COLLECTIVE: $18k → 12%INDIAN PUEBLO CULTURAL CENTER: $15k → 14%RED WILLOW CENTER: $12k → 18%KERES CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER: $13k → 10%INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE COLLECTIVE: $12k → 12%ACOMA PUEBLO: $12k → 30%BOSQUE SCHOOL: $12k → 14%ZIA PUEBLO: $15k → 10%CENTER FOR SW CULTURE: $12k → 14%NATIONAL GHOST RANCH FDN: $15k → 18%PICURIS PUEBLO: $12k → 18%ZIA PUEBLO: $12k → 10%OHKAY OWINGEH SENIOR CENTER: $15k → 18%NATIVE ARTS GALLERY: $13k → 18%SANTA ANA PUEBLO: $15k → 10%SANTO DOMINGO PUEBLO: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Chamiza Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in NM; by stated purpose, 88%.

Chamiza Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 40 repeat orgs$377k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
40

Total granted

$1.1M
$305k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
0%

Still filing today

25%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $74k · revenue +353%
  • PI
    PARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $51k · revenue +102%
  • TW
    TREES WATER AND PEOPLE
    4× · 2021–2025 · $47k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • AR
    ANCESTRAL RICH TREASURES OF ZUNI
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • LF
    LANL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • GN
    GROUNDWORKS NEW MEXICO KRISTI DORR
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
2
Santa Fe Botanical Garden

The santa fe botanical garden celebrates, cultivates and conserves the rich botanical heritage and biodiversity of our region. in partnership with nature, we demonstrate our commitment through education, science, conservation, community…

Environment
3
Recursos de Santa Fe

Shows the culture of the American southwest

Arts & Culture
4
Santa Fe Forest Coalition

Educate the public on forest conservation issues in New Mexico

Environment
5
The Center for Contemporary Arts of Santa Fe Inc

Through a variety of media created by emerging and established artists, the center for contemporary arts of santa fe, inc. (center) presents the arts of our time as vital elements in the cultural dialogue in santa fe and throughout new…

Arts & Culture
6
Sovereign Energy

Sovereign Energy builds the individual and collective power of Southwest Pueblos and Tribes to lead the way toward a just, interdependent, and sustainable energy future.

Environment
7
Nuestra Tierra Conservation Project

Nuestra tierra conservation project's core mission is to ensure that historically and deliberately excluded communities have access to the outdoors and that our people, history and values are authentically reflected in public land and…

—
8
The Helene Wurlitzer Foundation of New Mexico
—
9
Mesa Prieta Petroglyph Project

MPPP promotes heritage stewardship and preservation of archaeological features and the environment and cultural landscape of the Mesa Prieta region of the northern Rio Grande Valley through documentation, education and outreach.

Environment
10
The Paseo Project Inc

The PASEO Projects mission is to transform art through community and community through art. The PASEO Project lives at the center of three primary values: Art, Education, and Community. The PASEO Projects community is both local and…

Arts & Culture
11
Global Santa Fe

To promote the understanding of international issues and cultural affairs.

International
12
Indigenous Peyote Conservation Initative

Empowering indigenous communities to reconnect with, regenerate, and conserve their sacred peyote medicine.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The J Paul Getty Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANTO DOMINGO PUEBLO: $86,630 · OtherSANTO DOMINGO PUEBLOPUEBLO OF NAMBE: $50,716 · OtherSANTA CLARA PUEBLO: $47,480 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $46,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $41,950 · OtherPUEBLO OF SANTA ANA: $41,879 · OtherCONSERVATION LEGACY ANCESTRAL LANDS: $40,500 · OtherTAOS PUEBLO: $37,800 · Other+62 more: $681,333 · Other+62 moreKERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $74,000 · EducationKERES CHILDRE…PARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $51,000 · EducationPARTNERS IN E…Bosque School: $33,750 · EducationBosque SchoolGROUNDWORKS NEW MEXICO KRISTI DORR: $15,000 · EducationGROUNDWORKS N…+1 more: $3,600 · EducationINDIAN PUEBLO CULTURAL CENTER: $39,300 · Arts & CultureFLOWER HILL INSTITUTE: $38,457 · Arts & CulturePACHAMAMAS PATH INC: $12,700 · Arts & CultureOO-OO-NAH ART & CULTURAL CENTER: $10,300 · Arts & CultureCENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTREES WATER AND PEOPLE: $46,648 · EnvironmentFlowering Tree Permaculture Institute Inc: $14,900 · PhilanthropyTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST: $11,900 · PhilanthropyTHE TAOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · PhilanthropyNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,700 · PhilanthropyZUNI YOUTH ENRICHMENT PROJECT: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentLAGUNA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $22,824 · Community Improvement
Other$1,074,288Education$177,350Arts & Culture$106,757Environment$46,648Philanthropy$37,500Youth Development$30,000Community Improvement$22,824

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $74,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $51,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetTREES WATER AND PEOPLE: $46,648 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetINDIAN PUEBLO CULTURAL CENTER: $39,300 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFLOWER HILL INSTITUTE: $38,457 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBosque School: $33,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetZUNI YOUTH ENRICHMENT PROJECT: $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLAGUNA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $22,824 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetGROUNDWORKS NEW MEXICO KRISTI DORR: $15,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetNATIONAL GHOST RANCH FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFlowering Tree Permaculture Institute Inc: $14,900 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetPACHAMAMAS PATH INC: $12,700 over 1y, 16% of budgetGENERATIONAL EMPOWERMENT: $12,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST: $11,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TAOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGERARD'S HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSANTA FE INDIAN SCHOOL: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONES COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds TREES WATER AND PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN PUEBLO CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FLOWER HILL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Bosque School ↗
  • Who funds THE INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds ZUNI YOUTH ENRICHMENT PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds LAGUNA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GROUNDWORKS NEW MEXICO KRISTI DORR ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL GHOST RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Flowering Tree Permaculture Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds PACHAMAMAS PATH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Mexico Community FoundationNM44.8× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Mexico Community Foundation · First Nations Development Institute · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Albuquerque Area Indian Health Board Inc · Indian Pueblo Cultural Center · WK Kellogg Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · The Notah Begay III Foundation Inc · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Pnm Tnmp Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chamiza Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chamiza Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chamiza Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Chamiza Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chamiza’s filings →

    More from the funding graph