Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Chami Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$195k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.3MEducation$221kHuman Services$35kYouth Development$25kArts & Culture$11kReligion$10kCrime & Legal$9kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $120k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$605k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Camer Rand Fund Inc$70,000
Keep Memory Alive$50,000
UCLA Jonsson Cancer Center$25,000
Tyler Robinson Foundation$25,000
UCLA Foundation Digestive Diseases$15,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Fullerton's Love of Orange County Kids: $5k → 10%Fulfillment Fund: $2k → 14%Fulfillment Fund: $500 → 14%Fulfillment Fund: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
CA
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Chami Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 19% of the giving stays in NV; read by stated purpose it is 17% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Chami Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 16 repeat orgs$344k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$1.2M
$304k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+1%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    Camer Rand Fund Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $280k · revenue +36% · 64% of their budget
  • DH
    DEDHAM HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $250k · revenue +3% · 82% of their budget
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2019–2021 · $60k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • KM
    KEEP MEMORY ALIVE
    one grant, 2017 · $225k
  • TS
    The Shaquille O'Neal Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • CC
    Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Usc Care Medical Group Inc

To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…

Health
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Ucsf Health Medical Foundation

See schedule othe mission of ucsf health medical foundation is threefold: 1) to establish, operate and maintain medical clinics for the provision of healthcare services in california; 2) to promote health by providing, coordinating,…

Health
5
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
10
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memorial Medical Center Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Pickleberry Pie Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Keep Memory Alive — $267,000 · OtherKeep Memory AliveKEEP MEMORY ALIVE — $225,000 · OtherKEEP MEMORY ALIVEUCLA Jonsson Cancer Center — $77,000 · OtherUCLA Jonsson Cancer CenterSt Jude Children's Research Hospital — $74,000 · OtherSt Jude Children's Research HospitalMake a Wish Foundation — $35,000 · OtherClaremont McKenna College — $32,054 · Other+9 more — $85,500 · Other+9 moreCamer Rand Fund Inc — $280,000 · HealthCamer Rand Fund IncCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $60,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTERTYLER ROBINSON FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthTYLER ROBINSON FOUNDATIONSYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY — $22,000 · HealthSYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCI…MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Health+2 more — $10,000 · HealthDEDHAM HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 · Recreation & SportsDEDHAM HEALTH FOU…UCLA FOUNDATION — $111,000 · EducationUCLA FOUN…LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $30,000 · EducationLOYOLA MA…THE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Public BenefitPICKLEBERRY PIE INC — $9,500 · Arts & CultureDISCOVERY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FREEDOM TO CHOOSE PROJECT — $8,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$795,554Health$412,000Recreation & Sports$250,000Education$141,000Public Benefit$15,000Arts & Culture$10,500Crime & Legal$8,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCamer Rand Fund Inc — $280,000 over 4y, 64% of budgetDEDHAM HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 over 5y, 82% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $111,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetClaremont McKenna College — $32,054 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY — $22,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetMEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPICKLEBERRY PIE INC — $9,500 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetTHE FREEDOM TO CHOOSE PROJECT — $8,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFullertons Love of Orange County Kids (FLOCK) — $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSOCIAL & ECONOMIC ACTION FOR LEBANONINC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDISCOVERY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Camer Rand Fund Inc
  • Who funds DEDHAM HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds Claremont McKenna College
  • Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds TYLER ROBINSON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE FOLDED FLAG FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PICKLEBERRY PIE INC
  • Who funds THE FREEDOM TO CHOOSE PROJECT
  • Who funds ALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY
  • Who funds Fullertons Love of Orange County Kids (FLOCK)
  • Who funds SOCIAL & ECONOMIC ACTION FOR LEBANONINC
  • Who funds FULFILLMENT FUND
  • Who funds DISCOVERY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC9.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Chami Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chami Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Chami Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph