· Private foundation
Cesle C & Mamie F Dues Foundation Xxxxx4003
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of CESLE C & MAMIE F DUES FOUNDATION XXXXX4003’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $190k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN | $45,000 |
| EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC | $40,000 |
| EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER | $17,000 |
| CREATIVE KIDS | $15,000 |
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO | $15,000 |
| CHILDRENS GRIEF CENTER OF EL PASO | $15,000 |
| CANDLELIGHTERS OF EL PASO AREA | $12,000 |
| KIDS EXCEL EL PASO INC | $11,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF | $10,000 |
| LORETTO ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| EL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $7,500 |
| CASA OF EL PASO INC | $7,500 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NORTH | $6,305 |
| TEXAS SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLINDNESS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EPEL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER8× · 2018–2025 · $305k · revenue +394%
- EPEL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC7× · 2018–2025 · $303k · revenue +48%
- EPEL PASO BRIDGES ACADEMY7× · 2018–2024 · $137k · revenue +768%
Funded once
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +32%
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +88%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
El paso human services, inc. (ephsi), a private non-profit multi-purpose organization, has been providing social services in el paso county since 1984. ephsi has extensive experience in developing, implementing and executing federal, state…
To present world-renowned musicians with a commitment to artisitic excellence to delight and educate the border region with chamber music.
The mission of the advocacy center for the children of el paso is to advocate for child victims of abuse and neglect in the el paso area by providing education and a collaborative, comprehensive and efficient intervention process to seek…
To enable young people, especially those that need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible adults
The mission of the Child Crisis Center is to protect children, newborn through fifteen years of age, from abuse/neglect by providing temporary short-term emergency shelter and family support services.
Engage in the highest quality independent production, publication and or distribution of orginial news and or news-based materials of community value to far west texas, southern new mexico and northern chihuahua, mexico.
The purpose of the organization is to develop and facilitate the implementation of goals and programs that will enhance educational opportunities.
Child Advocacy
Professional association of physicians.
Our mission:project bravo builds bridges to opportunities that help individuals and families thrive in our community.
The el paso chamber exists to operate exclusively for charitable, educational, scientific, and literary purposes relating to the city of el paso. the chamber foundation serves as its supporting organization to pursue grants to fund…
To provide compassionate, coordinated, family-centered care for children with a dedicated commitment to excellent patient outcomes, inclusive leadership and innovative pediatric research and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Paso Center for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds EL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds EL PASO BRIDGES ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS GRIEF CENTER OF EL PASO ↗
- Who funds CANDLELIGHTERS OF THE EL PASO AREA ↗
- Who funds EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER ↗
- Who funds EL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF EL PASO INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO ↗
- Who funds EL PASO BORDER YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOC ↗
- Who funds KIDS EXCEL EL PASO INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLINDNESS ↗
- Who funds Prevent Blindness Texas ↗
- Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hunt Family Foundation · El Paso Community Foundation · Wilma Donohue Moleen Foundation Xxxxx7003 · Hervey Foundation · Robert E & Evelyn McKee Foundation · The Shiloff Family Foundation · Paso del Norte Community Foundation · United Way of El Paso County · Wl & Louise Seymour Endowment Xxxxx3004 · Sue Smith Harrison Family Foundation · The Electric Company Charitable Foundation · Paso del Norte Health Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cesle C & Mamie F Dues Foundation Xxxxx4003 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.