Loading…
· Private foundation
WL & LOUISE SEYMOUR ENDOWMENT XXXXX3004
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$213k
Granted FY2025
11
Grants
1
Communities
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of WL & LOUISE SEYMOUR ENDOWMENT XXXXX3004’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2025 · 11 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $123k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
- CENTRO DE SALUD FAMILIAR LA FE INC$75,000
- EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER$30,000
- OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS$30,000
- PASO DEL NORTE CHILDRENS$22,500
- ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$20,000
- CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY$10,000
- CITY OF EL PASO - EL PASO MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
- EL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$5,230
- EL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC$5,200
- CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF EL PASO$5,000
- SUL ROSS STATE UNIVERSITY$500
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $210k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 16 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else
16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
16
5
Total granted
$1.5M
$36k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+71%
+121%
Still filing today
56%
40%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CDCENTRO DE SALUD FAMILIAR LA FE INC7× · 2018–2025 · $358k · revenue +27%
- EPEL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC4× · 2021–2024 · $213k · revenue +383%
- OCOPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS6× · 2018–2025 · $170k · revenue +92%
Funded once
- SASALVATION ARMY EL PASOone grant, 2020 · $10k
- LSLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF THE SOUTHgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +121%
- UMUNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2019 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
El Paso Children's Hospital Corporation
To provide compassionate, coordinated, family-centered care for children with a dedicated commitment to excellent patient outcomes, inclusive leadership and innovative pediatric research and education.
Health
2
El Paso Human Services Inc
Empower children, youth and families in crisis, through the provision of quality and individualized services.
Human Services
3
Advocacy Center for the Children
The mission of the advocacy center children of el paso is to advocate for child victims of abuse and neglect in the el paso area by providing education and a collaborative, comprehensive and efficient intervention process to seek justice…
Crime & Legal
4
Child Crisis Center of El Paso Inc
The mission of the Child Crisis Center is to protect children, newborn through thirteen years of age, from abuse/neglect by providing temporary short-term emergency shelter and family support services.
Human Services
5
El Paso Community Foundation
The El Paso Community Foundation fosters philanthropy to address the unique opportunities and challenges of the El Paso, southern New Mexico, and Ciudad Juarez region as a grant maker.
Philanthropy
6
El Paso Coalition for the
The coalition is designated as the lead entity by hud for the dozens of agencies and individuals who provide housing, services, and support to the homeless community in el paso and carries out the responsibility of leading and managing the…
Housing & Shelter
7
Humane Society of El Paso Inc
To prevent suffering, neglect, abuse and cruelty to animals by providing information, raising public awareness of animal issues, and promoting responsible guardianship and kindness toward all living things.
Animals
8
Lacasa
LACASA Center protects, supports, empowers, and advocates for survivors of child abuse, domestic violence and sexual violence, and promotes interpersonal safety through community education, awareness, and prevention programs.
—
9
Family Service of El Paso Inc
To provide counseling, therapy and education services to individuals, families and groups.
Human Services
10
La Familia Del Paso Inc
La Familia del Paso provides mental health services for adults and youth.
—
11
El Paso Area Christian Counseling Service
Counseling Services offering hope, healing, and restoration to hurting people, marriages, and families using respected therapy practices and solid biblical principles.
Human Services
12
Casa of South Texas Inc
Child Advocacy
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Paso Center for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Centro De Salud Familiar La Fe Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$801,685Health$414,852Human Services$210,000Food & Nutrition$155,000Crime & Legal$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTRO DE SALUD FAMILIAR LA FE INC ↗
- Who funds EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER ↗
- Who funds EL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds EL PASO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY ↗
- Who funds HELPING RESTORE ABILITY ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF EL PASO INC ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF THE SOUTH ↗
- Who funds CASA OF EL PASO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
El Paso Community FoundationTX22.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: El Paso Community Foundation · Wilma Donohue Moleen Foundation Xxxxx7003 · United Way of El Paso County · Paso del Norte Community Foundation · Cesle C & Mamie F Dues Foundation Xxxxx4003 · Hervey Foundation · Paso del Norte Health Foundation · Gecu Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation WL & LOUISE SEYMOUR ENDOWMENT XXXXX3004 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.8× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 741204335 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Wl & Louise Seymour Endowment Xxxxx3004?
Find your warmest path to Wl & Louise Seymour Endowment Xxxxx3004 through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines