Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cesle C & Mamie F Dues Foundation Xxxxx4003

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$216k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$965kYouth Development$262kEducation$152kHealth$137kCrime & Legal$83kFood & Nutrition$79kArts & Culture$75kRecreation & Sports$40k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $190k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN$45,000
EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER INC$40,000
EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER$17,000
CREATIVE KIDS$15,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO$15,000
CHILDRENS GRIEF CENTER OF EL PASO$15,000
CANDLELIGHTERS OF EL PASO AREA$12,000
KIDS EXCEL EL PASO INC$11,000
BIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF$10,000
LORETTO ACADEMY$10,000
CASA OF EL PASO INC$7,500
EL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$7,500
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NORTH$6,305
TEXAS SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLINDNESS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO: $15k → 21%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO: $11k → 21%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO: $8k → 21%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 20 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
2

Total granted

$1.8M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+88%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    EL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $305k · revenue +394%
  • EP
    EL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $303k · revenue +48%
  • EP
    EL PASO BRIDGES ACADEMY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $137k · revenue +768%

Funded once

  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +32%
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
El Paso Human Services Inc

El paso human services, inc. (ephsi), a private non-profit multi-purpose organization, has been providing social services in el paso county since 1984. ephsi has extensive experience in developing, implementing and executing federal, state…

Human Services
2
El Paso Pro-Musica

To present world-renowned musicians with a commitment to artisitic excellence to delight and educate the border region with chamber music.

—
3
Advocacy Center for the Children of El Paso

The mission of the advocacy center for the children of el paso is to advocate for child victims of abuse and neglect in the el paso area by providing education and a collaborative, comprehensive and efficient intervention process to seek…

Crime & Legal
4
Boys & Girls Clubs of El Paso

To enable young people, especially those that need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible adults

—
5
Child Crisis Center of El Paso Inc

The mission of the Child Crisis Center is to protect children, newborn through fifteen years of age, from abuse/neglect by providing temporary short-term emergency shelter and family support services.

Human Services
6
El Paso Matters Inc

Engage in the highest quality independent production, publication and or distribution of orginial news and or news-based materials of community value to far west texas, southern new mexico and northern chihuahua, mexico.

Public Benefit
7
El Paso Education Initiative Inc

The purpose of the organization is to develop and facilitate the implementation of goals and programs that will enhance educational opportunities.

Education
8
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
9
El Paso County Medical Society

Professional association of physicians.

—
10
El Paso Community Action Program Project Bravo Inc

Our mission:project bravo builds bridges to opportunities that help individuals and families thrive in our community.

Community Improvement
11
El Paso Chamber of Commerce Foundation

The el paso chamber exists to operate exclusively for charitable, educational, scientific, and literary purposes relating to the city of el paso. the chamber foundation serves as its supporting organization to pursue grants to fund…

—
12
El Paso Children's Hospital Corporation

To provide compassionate, coordinated, family-centered care for children with a dedicated commitment to excellent patient outcomes, inclusive leadership and innovative pediatric research and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Paso Center for Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER: $305,000 · OtherEL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTEREL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $303,000 · OtherEL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN INCEL PASO BRIDGES ACADEMY: $137,000 · OtherEL PASO BRIDGES ACADEMYPASO DEL NORTE CHILDRENS: $132,500 · OtherPASO DEL NORTE CHILDRENSCANDLELIGHTERS OF THE EL PASO AREA: $87,535 · OtherCANDLELIGHTERS OF THE EL PASO AREABIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF: $69,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NORTH: $64,047 · OtherKIDS EXCEL EL PASO INC (KEEP): $62,000 · Other+4 more: $72,000 · Other+4 moreCHILDRENS GRIEF CENTER OF EL PASO: $121,000 · HealthCHILDRENS…NATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLINDNESS: $17,500 · HealthNATIONAL …MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · HealthMUSCULAR …CREATIVE KIDS INC: $131,000 · Youth DevelopmentEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $79,000 · Food & NutritionEL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureKIDS EXCEL EL PASO INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureCASA OF EL PASO INC: $42,500 · Crime & LegalEL PASO BORDER YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOC: $35,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO: $39,000 · Human Services
Other$1,232,082Health$153,500Youth Development$131,000Food & Nutrition$79,000Arts & Culture$75,000Crime & Legal$42,500Recreation & Sports$40,000Human Services$39,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER: $305,000 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetEL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $303,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetEL PASO BRIDGES ACADEMY: $137,000 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetCREATIVE KIDS INC: $131,000 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetCHILDRENS GRIEF CENTER OF EL PASO: $121,000 over 8y, 9.3% of budgetCANDLELIGHTERS OF THE EL PASO AREA: $87,535 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $79,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC: $55,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCASA OF EL PASO INC: $42,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO: $39,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetEL PASO BORDER YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOC: $35,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetKIDS EXCEL EL PASO INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLINDNESS: $17,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPrevent Blindness Texas: $17,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO BRIDGES ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS GRIEF CENTER OF EL PASO ↗
  • Who funds CANDLELIGHTERS OF THE EL PASO AREA ↗
  • Who funds EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF EL PASO INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF EL PASO ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO BORDER YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS EXCEL EL PASO INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds Prevent Blindness Texas ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hunt Family FoundationTX26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hunt Family Foundation · El Paso Community Foundation · Wilma Donohue Moleen Foundation Xxxxx7003 · Hervey Foundation · Robert E & Evelyn McKee Foundation · The Shiloff Family Foundation · Paso del Norte Community Foundation · United Way of El Paso County · Wl & Louise Seymour Endowment Xxxxx3004 · Sue Smith Harrison Family Foundation · The Electric Company Charitable Foundation · Paso del Norte Health Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cesle C & Mamie F Dues Foundation Xxxxx4003 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cesle C & Mamie F Dues Foundation Xxxxx4003. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cesle C & Mamie F Dues Foundation Xxxxx4003’s filings →

    More from the funding graph