Skip to content
Central Willamette Credit Union at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Central Willamette Credit Union

Provide simplified access to affordable financial services.

$114k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$120kHuman Services$59kHealth$36kYouth Development$33kEducation$10k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $99,798, the rows itemized in this filing. The $114,488 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,690 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $79k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$593M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALBANY PARKS & RECREATION$27,500
GO WEST FOUNDATION$25,600
MID-WILLAMETTE FAMILY YMCA$16,000
GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
ALBANY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION$8,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALBANY$7,250
SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES$5,448
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GO WEST FOUNDATION: $26k → 9%CREDIT UNION FOR KIDS CAMPAIGN: $18k → 9%GO WEST FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%MID-WILLAMETTE FAMILY YMCA: $16k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$136k · 3 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +444% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$136k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+444%
+27%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    GOWEST FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $59k · revenue +978%
  • AP
    ALBANY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $58k · revenue +444% · 46% of their budget
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALBANY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $19k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • LI
    Learfield IMG College
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
  • AG
    ALBANY GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +28%
  • SK
    SALEM KEIZER PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

—
2
Albany General Hospital

Albany general hospital (agh) achieves its mission of improving the health and well being of the community through its medical and surgical hospital and healthcare clinics providing outpatient care services at several area locations. agh…

Health
3
Boys and Girls Clubs of King County

Youth health and social, educational, and character development of youth.

Recreation & Sports
4
Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso

To promote exclusively the social welfare of boys and girls in washington; to provide guidance and to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, character, and cultural development of boys and girls in washington without regard…

Youth Development
5
Boys & Girls Club of Greater Scottsdale Foundation

To receive , hold and invest gifts and contributions for the benefit of the boys & girls clubs of greater scottsdale, inc .

Philanthropy
6
Boys & Girls Club of Western Lane County

To promote the health, social, educational, vocational and character development of youth between the ages of 6 and 18 years.

Youth Development
7
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
8
Boys and Girls Club of the Ozarks

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens. club membership is open to all kids ages 6-18.

Youth Development
9
Boys and Girls Club of Albany Inc

To provide a safe, fun place where youth are inspired to make healthy, responsible choices.

—
10
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Sioux Empire

To nurture, educate and enrich children and youth for life-long success.

Human Services
11
Boys & Girls Clubs Foundation Trust

To provide support for the boys & girls clubs, inc. which provides various educational and recreational services to youth.

—
12
Boys & Girls Club of Valdosta Inc

Providing educational and recreational programs for children.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation Corvallis; the most unlike its peers is Linn-Benton Community College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOWEST FOUNDATION: $58,600 · Human ServicesGOWEST FOUNDATIONMid-Willamette Family YMCA: $16,000 · Human ServicesMid-Willamette Family YMCASAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES: $5,448 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICESALBANY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION: $58,000 · Recreation & SportsALBANY PARKS AND RECREATI…City of Albany: $27,500 · OtherCity of AlbanyLearfield IMG College: $18,270 · OtherLearfield IMG CollegeSALEM KEIZER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10,000 · OtherSALEM KEIZER PUBLIC SCHO…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALBANY: $19,250 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS C…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CORVALLIS INC: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS C…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SALEM MARION & POLK COUNTIES: $5,250 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS C…ALBANY GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,500 · HealthALBANY GE…GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION CORVALLIS: $10,000 · HealthGOOD SAMA…Linn-Benton Community College Foundation: $10,000 · Education
Human Services$80,048Recreation & Sports$58,000Other$55,770Youth Development$32,500Health$20,500Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOWEST FOUNDATION: $58,600 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetALBANY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION: $58,000 over 3y, 46% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALBANY: $19,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMid-Willamette Family YMCA: $16,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALBANY GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION CORVALLIS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLinn-Benton Community College Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CORVALLIS INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES: $5,448 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SALEM MARION & POLK COUNTIES: $5,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …The Ford Family Found…United Way of Linn Be…Mario and Alma Pasteg…Maps Community Founda…Onpoint Community Cre…Braemar Charitable Tr…Meyer Memorial TrustM J Murdock Charitabl…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR23.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · United Way of Linn Benton and Lincoln Counties · Mario and Alma Pastega Family Foundation · Maps Community Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Braemar Charitable Trust · Meyer Memorial Trust · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Central Willamette Credit Union funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Central Willamette Credit Union. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Mid-Willamette Family Ymca: 17% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Corvallis Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Albany: 7% of income from government
  • Samaritan Health Services: 0% of income from government
  • Linn-Benton Community College Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Central Willamette Credit Union’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home