Skip to content
Central Texas Community Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Central Texas Community Foundation

To serve as a catalyst to nurture and inspire philanthropic giving, to build "community capital" through a permanent endowment fund, to provide a flexible vehicle for donors with varied philanthropic interests, to take initiative in addressing needs and shaping effective responses and to enrich the quality of life in the central texas…

$4.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
65
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$3.1MReligion$2.9MHealth$1.3MEmployment$1.3MAnimals$1.2MEducation$850kPhilanthropy$799kRecreation & Sports$726kOther$0
02FY2024 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 65 grants below total $3,067,711, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,517,925 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,450,214 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k47 grants · $894k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $829k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE ALLIANCE$1,012,000
THE ASSOC OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TAMU$300,000
DELL CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$125,000
SETON WILLIAMSON FOUNDATION$100,000
TEXAS ONE FUND INC$100,000
YMCA OF CENTRAL TEXAS$95,000
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN$75,000
FOSTER ANGELS$62,500
HONOR FLIGHT AUSTIN$61,400
ROCK (RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS)$60,000
SHEPHERD THEM ALL INC$50,400
HELPING HAND HOME$50,000
MAESTRO CARES FOUNDATION$50,000
BACKPACK FRIENDS$45,000
AUSTIN RIDGE BIBLE CHURCH$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $40k → 14%NELSON FAMILY LIFE FOUNDATION: $82k → 16%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $50k → 13%RESTORATION RANCH: $15k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $35k → 14%MAESTRO CARES FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%RESTORATION RANCH: $10k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%MAESTRO CARES FOUNDATION: $66k → 14%RESTORATION RANCH: $10k → 12%MAESTRO CARES FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%LADDERS FOR LEADERS: $15k → 6%LAUNCHPAD: $11k → 6%HUTTO RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 6%HAND TO HOLD: $10k → 10%JUST BECAUSE MINISTRIES OF HOPE: $100k → 6%JUST BECAUSE MINISTRIES OF HOPE: $50k → 6%JUST BECAUSE MINISTRIES OF HOPE: $50k → 6%HEROES NIGHT OUT: $20k → 6%JUST BECAUSE MINISTRIES OF HOPE: $20k → 6%HEROES NIGHT OUT: $19k → 6%JUST BECAUSE MINISTRIES OF HOPE: $10k → 6%HEROES NIGHT OUT: $10k → 6%HELPING HAND HOME: $64k → 10%FOSTER ANGELS: $63k → 10%GREATER TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $44k → 6%HELPING HAND HOME: $55k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME: $50k → 10%FOSTER ANGELS: $15k → 10%FOSTERING HOPE: $10k → 6%WONDERS AND WORRIES: $15k → 10%TEXAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $12k → 6%BACKPACK FRIENDS: $45k → 10%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $1.0M → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $120k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $40k → 6%BACKPACK FRIENDS: $10k → 10%GEORGETOWN PALACE THEATER: $25k → 6%BACKPACK FRIENDS: $10k → 10%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $20k → 6%A GIFT OF TIME ADULT DAY CARE: $19k → 6%ROTARY CLUB OF GEORGETOWN: $14k → 6%STONEHAVEN SENIOR CENTER: $12k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $10k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $10k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $10k → 6%GEORGETOWN PALACE THEATER: $10k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
IN
OH
PA
CO
MD
AZ
KS
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 77 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

77 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

77
48

Total granted

$12M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+32%

Still filing today

82%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $790k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +217%
  • WC
    WILLIAMSON COUNTY CRISIS CENTER
    5× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +260%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $647k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +50%
  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY AMERICAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $200k
  • Central Texas Food Bank Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $113k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Atx Helps

ATX Helps was created to fill gaps in the spectrum of services available to people in Austin who are experiencing homelessness.

Human Services
2
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
3
The Giving Rose Foundation Atx
Public Benefit
4
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
5
Texans Care for Children Inc

Texans Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to…

Crime & Legal
6
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
7
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
8
Teen and Family Services Austin

Teen and Family Services Austin provides counseling and education on an individual as well as group basis to provide support to parents and teens who are coping with teen high risk behavior.

—
9
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
10
Children's Connections Inc

Children's connections' mission is to empower families, promote healthy early childhood development, and foster family engagement to ensure a strong foundation for lifelong well-being.

Human Services
11
The Good Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
12
Austin Child Guidance Center

To improve the mental health of children and their families through early intervention, diagnosis, and treatment to help them develop the emotional skills for meeting life's challenges.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ascension Seton Williamson Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Md Anderson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

125 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 125 of the 151 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
34
Early backer (in before they grew)
115/125
Grantees still filing
75/125
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Round Rock Area Serving Center Inc: $1,298,040 · OtherRound Rock Area Serving Center IncWILLIAMSON COUNTY CRISIS CENTER: $1,175,750 · OtherWILLIAMSON COUNTY CRISIS CENTERYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $647,200 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL TEXASUNIVERSITY CATHOLIC CENTER AUSTIN TEXAS: $480,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY CATHOLIC CENTER AUSTIN TEXASDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $380,000 · OtherTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC: $280,000 · OtherHonor Flight Austin: $272,275 · Other+75 more: $3,454,146 · Other+75 moreBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $1,220,250 · Human ServicesBROOKWOOD IN GEORGET…Charity Navigator: $383,000 · Human ServicesCharity NavigatorANNIE'S WAY JUST BECAUSE MINISTRIES OF HOPE: $230,000 · Human ServicesANNIE'S WAY JUST BEC…HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $168,500 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND HOME FO…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $95,000 · Human Services+22 more: $536,705 · Human Services+22 moreAUSTIN DOG ALLIANCE: $280,000 · AnimalsTHE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $250,000 · AnimalsHumane Heroes Inc: $202,300 · AnimalsFERALLIFE GUARDS: $95,000 · AnimalsAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $80,000 · AnimalsCritical Kitten Care Fund: $60,000 · AnimalsFANS OF THE WILLIAMSON COUNTY REGIONAL ANIMAL SHELTER: $45,000 · Animals+5 more: $114,000 · AnimalsTHE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $300,000 · EducationALPINE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $135,000 · EducationHUTTO EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $62,706 · EducationBUNCOMBE COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $60,000 · EducationSHEPHERD THEM ALL INC: $50,400 · EducationAUSTIN EXPLORE INC: $50,000 · EducationTHE RISE SCHOOL OF AUSTIN: $45,000 · EducationTEXAS DENTAL ASSOCIATION SMILES FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Education+3 more: $43,000 · EducationAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $185,000 · PhilanthropyI LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE: $166,350 · PhilanthropyTHE ANNUNCIATION MATERNITY HOME INC: $88,000 · PhilanthropyTravis Manion Foundation: $75,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST: $60,000 · PhilanthropyMD Anderson Foundation: $55,000 · PhilanthropyCANDID: $50,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $25,000 · PhilanthropyROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $457,100 · Recreation & SportsCANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION: $109,500 · Recreation & SportsWILLIAMSON COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 · Recreation & Sports+2 more: $26,700 · Recreation & SportsWILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $589,000 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION: $25,000 · Crime & Legal+3 more: $33,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$7,987,411Human Services$2,633,455Animals$1,126,300Education$776,106Philanthropy$704,350Recreation & Sports$693,300Crime & Legal$647,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRound Rock Area Serving Center Inc: $1,298,040 over 4y, 35% of budgetBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $1,220,250 over 8y, 11% of budgetWILLIAMSON COUNTY CRISIS CENTER: $1,175,750 over 5y, 17% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $647,200 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetWILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $589,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $457,100 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetCharity Navigator: $383,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $380,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $300,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAUSTIN DOG ALLIANCE: $280,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC: $280,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetHonor Flight Austin: $272,275 over 5y, 14% of budgetTHE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $250,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetASCENSION SETON: $237,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANNIE'S WAY JUST BECAUSE MINISTRIES OF HOPE: $230,000 over 5y, 83% of budgetHumane Heroes Inc: $202,300 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $185,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $168,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetI LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE: $166,350 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetCELEBRATION OF LOVE: $146,050 over 4y, 44% of budgetALPINE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $135,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $112,975 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION: $109,500 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetSacred Heart Community Clinic: $109,500 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GEORGETOWN: $105,000 over 8y, 6.0% of budgetTexas One Fund Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWILLIAMSON COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 over 5y, 40% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $95,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFERALLIFE GUARDS: $95,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetTHE ANNUNCIATION MATERNITY HOME INC: $88,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetIndependent Identity: $85,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION: $77,500 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetTravis Manion Foundation: $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHELLO GORGEOUS OF HOPE INC: $73,500 over 5y, 19% of budgetSENIOR ACCESS TX: $71,800 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetSamaritan Center for Counseling and Pastoral Care Inc: $65,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBACKPACK FRIENDS INCORPORATED: $65,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetAustin Jazz Workshop: $63,000 over 7y, 7.8% of budgetHUTTO EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $62,706 over 2y, 15% of budgetTHE SPECIAL FORCES CHARITABLE TRUST: $60,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBUNCOMBE COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAGAPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $58,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $56,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMD Anderson Foundation: $55,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetROUND ROCK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $51,517 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCentral Texas Table of Grace Inc: $50,450 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetCATALYST COLLECTIVE: $50,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Round Rock Area Serving Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COUNTY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
  • Who funds DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN DOG ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF AUSTIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Honor Flight Austin ↗
  • Who funds THE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds ASCENSION SETON ↗
  • Who funds ANNIE'S WAY JUST BECAUSE MINISTRIES OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Humane Heroes Inc ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds I LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE ↗
  • Who funds CELEBRATION OF LOVE ↗
  • Who funds ALPINE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds CANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Sacred Heart Community Clinic ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GEORGETOWN ↗
  • Who funds Texas One Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds FERALLIFE GUARDS ↗
  • Who funds THE ANNUNCIATION MATERNITY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Independent Identity ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foun…Georgetown Healthcare…Georgetown Area Commu…United Way for Greate…St David's FoundationThe Moody FoundationUnited Way of William…Topfer Family Foundat…Carl C Anderson Sr an…Harry E and Eda L Mon…United Way WorldwideBetter Business Bureau
Austin Community Foundation IncTX70× affinity44 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Georgetown Healthcare System Inc · Georgetown Area Community Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · St David's Foundation · The Moody Foundation · United Way of Williamson County · Topfer Family Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr · United Way Worldwide · Better Business Bureau

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Central Texas Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Central Texas Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 151 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Central Texas’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home