Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Community foundation

Georgetown Area Community Foundation

The mission of GEORGETOWN AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION (gacf) is to bridge donors to nonprofits with effective solutions to meet real community needs.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$989k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$1.7MRecreation & Sports$1.4MEducation$982kHealth$961kPhilanthropy$939kReligion$927kYouth Development$720kArts & Culture$187kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 32 grants below total $1,952,020 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,240,134 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $288,114 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $391k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $546k
  • $250k+1 grant · $989k
$20,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF GEORGETOWN PARKS AND REC$989,140
YMCA OF CENTRAL TEXAS$110,000
ROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS$102,400
CENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$80,000
GRACE ACADEMY GEORGETOWN$53,000
CASA OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY TEXAS$50,500
HONOR FLIGHT AUSTIN$50,000
ROTARY CLUB OF GEORGETOWN FOUNDATION$50,000
THE GRATITUDE INITIATIVE$50,000
GEORGETOWN BACKPACK BUDDIES$45,000
SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY - UNIVERSITY RELATIONS$40,000
GEORGETOWN FAMILY YMCA$30,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GEORGETOWN$27,500
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$23,000
GEORGETOWN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$22,237
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $251k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ROSIE NETWORK INC: $10k → 11%AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $25k → 10%ROSIE NETWORK INC: $10k → 11%HUTTO RESOURCE CENTER: $20k → 6%AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $10k → 10%AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $10k → 10%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $25k → 6%OPPORTUNITIES WILLIAMSON & BURNET COUNTYS: $16k → 6%OPPORTUNITIES WILLIAMSON & BURNET COUNTYS: $15k → 6%OPPORTUNITIES WILLIAMSON & BURNET COUNTYS: $15k → 6%OPPORTUNITIES WILLIAMSON & BURNET COUNTYS: $15k → 6%OPPORTUNITIES WILLIAMSON & BURNET COUNTYS: $15k → 6%OPPORTUNITIES WILLIAMSON & BURNET COUNTYS: $15k → 6%OPPORTUNITIES WILLIAMSON & BURNET COUNTYS: $15k → 6%OPPORTUNITIES WILLIAMSON & BURNET COUNTYS: $15k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $10k → 6%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OR
OH
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.0M · 50 repeat orgs$704k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

50 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
39

Total granted

$7.0M
$679k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+38%

Still filing today

72%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RR
    ROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $863k · revenue +147%
  • GA
    Grace Academy of Georgetown
    8× · 2017–2024 · $382k · revenue +118%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $374k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +74%
  • LG
    LIVING GRACE CANINE RANCHgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $55k · revenue +40%
  • SO
    SEEDS OF STRENGTH GIVING CIRCLE
    one grant, 2021 · $42k · revenue -9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Good Work Austin

Good Work Austin's mission is to foster healthy careers in the local food and beverage industry through professional development and advocacy for more equitable practices.

Public Benefit
2
Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce

The Chamber's mission is to provide leadership that facilitates the creation of a prosperous regional economy and results in effective advocacy for its members.

—
3
Christ Together Greater Austin

Ctga is a partnership of pastors and churches seeking to demonstrate and communicate the love of god to the people of greater austin by ensuring that every man, woman, and child has repeated opportunities to see, hear, and respond to the…

Education
4
The Girls School of Austin Inc

Our School provides an intellectually challenging education for girls in a supportive and creative environment, and inspires girls to achieve personal excellence and to go on to lead distinguished and fulfilling lives.

Education
5
Great Hearts America-Texas

The primary goal of Great Hearts America-Texas is to graduate thoughtful leaders of character who will contribute to a more philosophical, humane, and just society.

Environment
6
Good News Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
7
Greater Texas Foundation
Education
8
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
9
Worksource - Greater Austin Area Dba Workforce Solutions - Capital

To lead the region's workforce system in the development of a world-class workforce.

Employment
10
The Giving Rose Foundation Atx
Public Benefit
11
The Good Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
12
Greater Satx

The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown Caring Place and the most unlike its peers is Site Projects Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteady#6#1#8#11#16#12#5#20#14
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%9%5–10yr20%30%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr10%16%35–55yr13%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr16%42%20–35yr10%18%35–55yr13%14%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/94
the rest of the field
15%
20,232/136,710

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/71
Grantees still filing
53/71
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF GEORGETOWN PARKS AND REC — $1,355,417 · OtherCITY OF GEORGETOWN PARKS AND RECYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $374,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL TEXASHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY TEXAS INC — $145,100 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GEORGETOWN — $284,300 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GEORGETOWNHonor Flight Austin — $150,000 · OtherGEORGETOWN CARING PLACE — $189,250 · Other+48 more — $1,702,135 · Other+48 moreCENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $864,000 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL TEXAS …Georgetown Backpack Buddies — $128,248 · PhilanthropyGeorgetown Bac…SEEDS OF STRENGTH GIVING CIRCLE — $42,498 · Philanthropy+3 more — $39,500 · PhilanthropyROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC — $862,900 · Recreation & SportsROCK RIDE ON…GIRLSTART — $60,000 · Recreation & SportsGIRLSTARTAUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP — $40,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsGrace Academy of Georgetown — $381,500 · EducationGrace Academ…THE GRATITUDE INITIATIVE — $150,000 · EducationTHE GRATITUD…Texas A&M Foundation — $100,000 · EducationTexas A&M Fo…SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY — $88,500 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN…GEORGETOWN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $72,237 · EducationGEORGETOWN I…THE FRIENDS OF THE GEORGETOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY — $60,000 · EducationTHE FRIENDS …The Ann Richards School Foundation — $37,000 · Education+5 more — $60,000 · Education+5 moreROTARY CLUB OFGEORGETOWN FOUNDATION — $160,000 · Human ServicesWILLIAMSON-BURNET COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES INC — $121,000 · Human ServicesFAITH IN ACTION GEORGETOWN — $70,200 · Human ServicesBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesAUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY — $45,000 · Human ServicesGENAUSTIN — $36,500 · Human ServicesA GIFT OF TIME - ADULT DAY CARE — $33,470 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS OF GEORGETOWN INC — $25,600 · Human ServicesCapital Investing in Development and Employment of Adults Inc — $25,000 · Human Services+2 more — $40,000 · Human ServicesCASA of Williamson County Texas — $333,250 · Crime & LegalWILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $122,000 · Crime & LegalThe Georgetown Project — $240,750 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $25,000 · HealthScott & White Healthcare Foundation — $25,000 · HealthBAY ISLAND IMPACT — $12,800 · Health+1 more — $7,000 · Health
Other$4,200,202Philanthropy$1,074,246Recreation & Sports$977,900Education$949,237Human Services$601,770Crime & Legal$455,250Health$310,550

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $864,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC — $862,900 over 8y, 9.2% of budgetGrace Academy of Georgetown — $381,500 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $374,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCASA of Williamson County Texas — $333,250 over 8y, 14% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GEORGETOWN — $284,300 over 7y, 9.1% of budgetThe Georgetown Project — $240,750 over 7y, 8.7% of budgetGEORGETOWN CARING PLACE — $189,250 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetROTARY CLUB OFGEORGETOWN FOUNDATION — $160,000 over 6y, 32% of budgetTHE GRATITUDE INITIATIVE — $150,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetHonor Flight Austin — $150,000 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY TEXAS INC — $145,100 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetGeorgetown Backpack Buddies — $128,248 over 4y, 26% of budgetWILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $122,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetWILLIAMSON-BURNET COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES INC — $121,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC — $90,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY — $88,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL ROTARY CLUB OF GEORGETOWN - SUN CITY — $76,950 over 4y, 41% of budgetGEORGETOWN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $72,237 over 3y, 10% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION GEORGETOWN — $70,200 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $70,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE GEORGETOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY — $60,000 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetGIRLSTART — $60,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetLIVING GRACE CANINE RANCH — $55,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetWILLIAMSON COUNTY CRISIS CENTER — $50,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY — $45,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetLiteracy Council of Williamson County — $43,400 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetAUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP — $40,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE GEORGETOWN PALACE THEATRE INC — $39,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetThe Ann Richards School Foundation — $37,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetGENAUSTIN — $36,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSamaritan Center for Counseling and Pastoral Care Inc — $34,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetA GIFT OF TIME - ADULT DAY CARE — $33,470 over 2y, 20% of budgetHELPING HANDS OF GEORGETOWN INC — $25,600 over 1y, 18% of budgetCapital Investing in Development and Employment of Adults Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetScott & White Healthcare Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUTTO RESOURCE CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetTHE ROSIE NETWORK INC — $20,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetCENTRAL TEXAS PHILHARMONIC INC — $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE ANNUNCIATION MATERNITY HOME INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARRY Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS IN A NEW GROOVE — $20,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTEACHING IN THE SON INC — $18,700 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetNW COLLEGIATE MINISTRIES — $18,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Grace Academy of Georgetown ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Williamson County Texas ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GEORGETOWN ↗
  • Who funds The Georgetown Project ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN CARING PLACE ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OFGEORGETOWN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GRATITUDE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds Honor Flight Austin ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Georgetown Backpack Buddies ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON-BURNET COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ROTARY CLUB OF GEORGETOWN - SUN CITY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION GEORGETOWN ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE GEORGETOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds GIRLSTART ↗
  • Who funds LIVING GRACE CANINE RANCH ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COUNTY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds Literacy Council of Williamson County ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS OF STRENGTH GIVING CIRCLE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Georgetown Healthcare…Central Texas Communi…Austin Community Foun…United Way of William…United Way for Greate…St David's FoundationW D Kelley FoundationThe Moody FoundationUnited Way WorldwideTopfer Family Foundat…Carl C Anderson Sr an…Harry E and Eda L Mon…
Georgetown Healthcare System IncTX59.6× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Georgetown Healthcare System Inc · Central Texas Community Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Williamson County · United Way for Greater Austin · St David's Foundation · W D Kelley Foundation · The Moody Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Topfer Family Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Georgetown Area Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge — 100% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines