Skip to content

· Private foundation

Central Soup Society of Philadelphia

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$39kHuman Services$21kCommunity Improvement$16kHealth$14kHousing & Shelter$13kEducation$10kPhilanthropy$5kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$411k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER$3,900
MOUNTAIN LAKES COMMUNITY SERVICE$3,500
THE LIGHT HOUSE$2,000
WESTSIDE FOOD PANTRY$1,800
GREENS FARMS ACADEMY$1,750
PLANNED PARENTHOD OF EAST PA$1,700
TGR FOUNDATION$1,700
PHILABUNDANCE$1,500
THE POTOMAC SCHOOL$1,000
POZEZ JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA$1,000
PERSON TO PERSON$750
CHANGING LATITUDES$500
LUNCH BREAK$500
MARTHA'S TABLE$500
SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%POZEZ JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA: $1k → 6%Peter Paul Development Center: $5k → 9%Peter Paul Development Center: $4k → 9%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$112k · 19 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
5

Total granted

$112k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+8%

Still filing today

58%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Philabundance
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +0%
  • TL
    THE LIGHT HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +18%
  • MT
    MARTHA'S TABLE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • LW
    LAKE WALES CARE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -3%
  • GF
    GREENE FARMS ACADEMY
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • FOOD RESCUE US INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Trust

The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…

Food & Nutrition
2
The Dc Central Kitchen Inc

We use food as a tool to strengthen bodies, empower minds, and build communities. dcck prepares people facing high barriers to employment for culinary careers, and creates jobs for our graduates through innovative programs that expand…

—
3
Manna Food Center Inc

Manna food center, inc strives to end hunger in our community through education, advocacy, and food distribution to individuals and partner agencies. manna's guiding principles are to be service-driven, community- centered and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Share Food Program

As the largest serving hunger-relief organization in the greater philadelphia region, share food program's mission is reducing regional food insecurity by providing nourishing food to a network of community-based partners and directly to…

Food & Nutrition
5
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
6
Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank

Our mission is to leverage the power of community to achieve lasting solutions to hunger and its root causes.

Food & Nutrition
7
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
8
Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations. we…

Food & Nutrition
9
Community Kitchen Pittsburgh

Community kitchen pittsburgh is a nonprofit food service company. because poverty, food insecurity and employment are entwined issues, we work across these focus areas, engaging in the following activities: "culinary based workforce…

Food & Nutrition
10
Chester County Food Bank

We mobilize and educate our community to ensure equitable access to nutritious and familiar food. we do this by raising, and soliciting funds for the acquisition, storage, growing, collection and distribution of food to low income citizens…

Food & Nutrition
11
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
12
Arcadia Food Inc

Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philabundance; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $9,600 · OtherCYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CENTERSOME INC: $7,550 · OtherSOME INCMOUNTAIN LAKE COMMUNITY SERVICE INC: $7,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN LAKE COMMUNITY SERVICE INCWESTSIDE FOOD PANTRY: $6,751 · OtherWESTSIDE FOOD PANTRYPLANNED PARENTHOD OF EAST PA: $4,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOD OF EAST PALAKE WALES CARE CENTER INC: $3,300 · OtherLAKE WALES CARE CENTER INCTHE MASK AND WIG CLUB: $3,200 · OtherTHE MASK AND WIG CLUBCHANGING LATITUDES: $3,000 · OtherCHANGING LATITUDESDr Theodore Atlas Foundation: $2,600 · OtherPlanned Parenthood of East PA: $2,600 · OtherThe Hall School: $1,899 · Other+3 more: $3,000 · Other+3 morePhilabundance: $13,200 · Food & NutritionPhilabundanceMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $7,550 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S TABLE INCLUNCH BREAK INC: $1,500 · Food & NutritionLUNCH BREAK INCFOOD RESCUE US INC: $1,250 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $1,100 · Food & NutritionTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $12,600 · Housing & ShelterTHE LIGHT H…PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $10,600 · Human ServicesPETER PAUL…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COM…CYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $6,600 · Community ImprovementThe Potomac School: $3,000 · EducationGREENS FARMS ACADEMY INC: $1,750 · EducationTIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC: $1,700 · EducationPERSON TO PERSON INC: $4,750 · PhilanthropyBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $3,100 · Health
Other$55,000Food & Nutrition$24,600Housing & Shelter$12,600Human Services$11,600Community Improvement$6,600Education$6,450Philanthropy$4,750Health$3,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPhilabundance: $13,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $12,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $10,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $7,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC: $7,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN LAKE COMMUNITY SERVICE INC: $7,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $6,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPERSON TO PERSON INC: $4,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE WALES CARE CENTER INC: $3,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $3,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Potomac School: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREENS FARMS ACADEMY INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC: $1,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUNCH BREAK INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD RESCUE US INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA BETTER CHANCE IN DARIEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds THE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN LAKE COMMUNITY SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds CYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PERSON TO PERSON INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE WALES CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds The Potomac School ↗
  • Who funds GREENS FARMS ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds TIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUNCH BREAK INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD RESCUE US INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds A BETTER CHANCE IN DARIEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA12.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Central Soup Society of Philadelphia funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Central Soup Society of Philadelphia. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Person to Person Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Lunch Break Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Lake Wales Care Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Central Soup Society of Philadelphia?

Find your warmest path to Central Soup Society of Philadelphia through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Central Soup Society of Philadelphia’s filings →

More from the funding graph