Skip to content

· Private foundation

Celeste and Kurt Zuch Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$186k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$508kReligion$129kRecreation & Sports$41kYouth Development$16kHealth$13kArts & Culture$10kHuman Services$9kInternational$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k25 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,025
Median grant
12
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHELTON LANDMARK FOUNDATION$50,000
VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION$45,526
UVA FUND$20,000
HIGHLAND PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$16,500
STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY$10,000
VIRGINIA TECH ATHLETICS FOUNDATION$9,500
STAND UP FOR CANCER$5,500
MOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION$5,000
IMG ACADEMY$2,500
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$2,500
THE TURNER 12 INC$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
DESTINY BUILDERS$2,000
NETWORK FOR GOOD$1,030
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$1,025
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MEN AND WOMEN FOR HUMAN EXCELLENCE: $500 → 22%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%GOSHEN VALLEY FOUNDATION: $20 → 6%HERO'S BRIDGE: $1k → 6%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $250 → 26%CITYSQUARE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
IN
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 27% of Celeste and Kurt Zuch Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Celeste and Kurt Zuch Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$430k · 31 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
55

Total granted

$430k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+14%

Still filing today

45%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +49%
  • TH
    THEOLOGICAL HORIZONS
    4× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +144%
  • VIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $3k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +204%
  • HP
    HIGHLAND PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL PTA
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
3
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
4
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
7
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
8
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
9
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
10
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities Foundation of Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/53
Grantees still filing
34/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HIGHLAND PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $105,700 · OtherHIGHLAND PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCHSHELTON SCHOOL: $56,880 · OtherSHELTON SCHOOLFOLDS OF HONOR: $53,410 · OtherFOLDS OF HONORUVA FUND: $40,350 · OtherUVA FUNDVIRGINIA TECH ATHLETICS FOUNDATION: $36,500 · OtherVIRGINIA TECH ATHLETICS FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FUND: $20,000 · Other+66 more: $88,259 · Other+66 moreVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $180,552 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INCSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $35,000 · EducationSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INCST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $33,200 · EducationST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXASFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $11,200 · Education+8 more: $13,720 · EducationSHELTON LANDMARK FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropySHELTON L…DALLAS SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $5,000 · PhilanthropyDALLAS SO…THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $4,500 · PhilanthropyTHE CRYST…+2 more: $1,314 · PhilanthropyTurner 12: $8,500 · Human ServicesHERO'S BRIDGE: $1,000 · Human ServicesCITYSQUARE: $1,000 · Human ServicesMen and Women for Human Excellence Inc: $500 · Human Services+3 more: $520 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION: $5,500 · Civil RightsStudents for Life of America Inc: $250 · Civil RightsLIVE ACTION: $250 · Civil RightsTHEOLOGICAL HORIZONS: $3,050 · ReligionAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $1,200 · ReligionRECONCILIATION OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $620 · Religion+1 more: $100 · ReligionOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$401,099Education$273,672Philanthropy$60,814Human Services$11,520Civil Rights$6,000Religion$4,970Food & Nutrition$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $180,552 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTON LANDMARK FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $33,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $11,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTurner 12: $8,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCORNERSTONE CROSSROADS ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDALLAS SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHEOLOGICAL HORIZONS: $3,050 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDESTINY BUILDERS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCCA TEXAS FUND: $1,450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for Choice: $1,200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAYO DE SOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPER SCHOLAS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN STREET CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF McCORMICK COUNTY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHERO'S BRIDGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED TO LEARN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYSQUARE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA FIESTA DE LAS SEIS BANDERAS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $965 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAtlanta Speech School Inc: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRECONCILIATION OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $620 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC: $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG SURVIVAL COALITION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS LIFE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $465 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADOPT A PLATOON SOLDIER SUPPORT EFFORT INC: $264 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE ACTION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK GIRLS LACROSSE: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOR THE TROOPS: $140 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens United Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTON LANDMARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Turner 12 ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE CROSSROADS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
  • Who funds THEOLOGICAL HORIZONS ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN HAND ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds DESTINY BUILDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CCA TEXAS FUND ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Choice ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX22.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Farrell Family Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Celeste and Kurt Zuch Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Celeste and Kurt Zuch Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Celeste and Kurt Zuch Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph