Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cecile Stephens Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
59
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$362kHuman Services$45kArts & Culture$34kHousing & Shelter$27kReligion$25kHealth$24kYouth Development$22kAnimals$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VOCAL MUSIC PARENTS ASSOCIATION$5,336
INTERVAL HOUSE$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
AMANDA GILLIS FOUNDATION$2,500
BEYOND BLINDNESS$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
COVENANT HOUSE$2,000
SEAL BEACH ANIMAL SHELTER$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%INTERVAL HOUSE: $3k → 10%INTERVAL HOUSE: $3k → 10%INTERVAL HOUSE: $3k → 10%INTERVAL HOUSE: $3k → 10%INTERVAL HOUSE: $3k → 10%INTERVAL HOUSE: $3k → 10%INTERVAL HOUSE: $3k → 10%INTERVAL HOUSE: $3k → 10%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE FULLERTON: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
MI
NY
OR
NV
CA
UT
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$195k · 16 repeat orgs$372k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 50 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
393

Total granted

$195k
$332k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+77%

Still filing today

38%
2%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BEYOND BLINDNESS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +68%
  • INTERVAL HOUSE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +18%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • LA
    Los Alamitos Youth Centergraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +41%
  • WW
    WOMEN WHO WELD
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
2
All About Kids La
Philanthropy
3
Oc United Together

We exist to empower the vulnerable who have experienced the breakdown of the family unit through restorative relationships and life-skills development. we serve those who have experienced foster care, domestic abuse, homelessness, and…

Human Services
4
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
5
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
6
Covenant House Texas

Covenant house texas shelters, protects, and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, and sexually exploited youth.

Human Services
7
Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services
8
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
9
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
10
Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness

Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…

Human Services
11
Wayfinder Family Services

The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…

Human Services
12
Assistance League of Glendale

Provides philanthropic programs through volunteer activities based on the needs of the community.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Assistance League of Fullerton; the most unlike its peers is Grace Opens Doors Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 459 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE OPENS DOORS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $22,500 · OtherGRACE OPENS DOORS CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONVOCAL MUSIC PARENTS ASSOCIATION OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL: $22,304 · OtherVOCAL MUSIC PARENTS ASSOCIATION OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOLBEYOND BLINDNESS: $20,000 · OtherBEYOND BLINDNESSSEAL BEACH ANIMAL SHELTER: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,680 · OtherVOCAL MUSIC PARENTS' ASSOCIATION: $11,781 · Other+184 more: $233,409 · Other+184 moreINTERVAL HOUSE: $20,000 · Human ServicesINTERVAL H…COVENANT HOUSE: $16,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT H…ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF FULLERTON: $2,000 · Human ServicesPRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC: $12,000 · EducationWOMEN WHO WELD: $3,000 · EducationNAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · EducationPROJECT ZAWADI INC: $1,000 · EducationMIRACULOUS LOVE KIDS: $4,600 · InternationalROBYNES NEST: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentNorth Park Little League Baseball Inc: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$338,674Human Services$38,000Education$18,500International$4,600Youth Development$2,500Recreation & Sports$1,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRACE OPENS DOORS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 6y, 24% of budgetVOCAL MUSIC PARENTS ASSOCIATION OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL: $22,304 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetBEYOND BLINDNESS: $20,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetINTERVAL HOUSE: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMIRACULOUS LOVE KIDS: $4,600 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetLos Alamitos Youth Center: $3,400 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN WHO WELD: $3,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF FULLERTON: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOX ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA: $2,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPROJECT ZAWADI INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRACE OPENS DOORS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VOCAL MUSIC PARENTS ASSOCIATION OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND BLINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds INTERVAL HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds PRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRACULOUS LOVE KIDS ↗
  • Who funds Los Alamitos Youth Center ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN WHO WELD ↗
  • Who funds ROBYNES NEST ↗
  • Who funds NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF FULLERTON ↗
  • Who funds COX ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · Network for Good · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cecile Stephens Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cecile Stephens Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cecile Stephens Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cecile Stephens Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 459 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cecile Stephens’ filings →

    More from the funding graph