Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cathys Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$56kHuman Services$50kHousing & Shelter$43kHealth$31kEducation$18kReligion$10kArts & Culture$5kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$488k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mercy Mall of Virginia$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Richmond Animl Care Control Fdn$1,500
St Jude Children's Research Hosp$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Richmond SPCA$1,500
Greater Richmond SCAN$1,000
ACTS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Mercy Mall of Virginia: $2k → 7%Holly Angels Residential Facility: $3k → 22%Mercy Mall of Virginia: $2k → 7%Bethel Bible Village: $2k → 12%Bethel Bible Village: $2k → 12%Fostering Arcadia: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$196k · 17 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
8

Total granted

$196k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+33%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHousing & ShelterHealthCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GR
    GREATER RICHMOND SCAN - STOP CHILD ABUSE NOW INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +99%
  • RA
    RICHMOND ANIMAL LEAGUE INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $20k · revenue +57%
  • CR
    CHATTANOOGA ROOM IN THE INN INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $20k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • HF
    Henrico Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • HA
    HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY Igraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +33%
  • FA
    Fostering Acadiagraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +297%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Richmond County Partnership for Children Inc

Richmond County Partnership for Children advances a high-quality, accountable system of care and early education for each child beginning with a healthy birth, and supports families to improve early childhood health and development to…

Education
2
For Children's Sake of Virginia Inc

For children's sake is dedicated to promoting positive environments for children and families that develop trust, stability and independence.

Human Services
3
Cats Cradle of Greater Richmond Incorporated

Cat's Cradle of Greater Richmond rescues cats and kittens from the streets, area kill shelters and situations of abuse, abandonment or neglect. We also take owner-surrender felines on case-by-case basis. We ensure that the cats in our…

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Richmond Animal Welfare Foundation

Dedicated to providing emergency medical careto our city shelter to helpsave as many lives as possible, and supporting animal lives in the community

Animals
5
United Methodist Family Services of Virginia

Shineforth Child & Family Services is the unwavering champion that every child deserves, and our vision is to strengthen humanity, one child at a time. Shineforth operates eight offices across Virginia and offers more than a dozen…

Human Services
6
James Barry Robinson Institute

The Barry Robinson Center offers programs to improve the lives of children and their families.

Human Services
7
Sfc Virginia

Sfc virginia is a foster-based animal rescue group in fredericksburg, va. founded in june 2019 with a focus on saving dogs and cats from rural and otherwise underserved shelters in the state, we strive to provide quality medical care…

Animals
8
Rappcats

RappCats Adoption Center, a cage-less, no kill facility is the only Virginia approved cat shelter in Rappahannock County. We work closely with the community to reduce cat overpopulation through our spay and neuter program, which provides…

Animals
9
St James's Children's Center

Offering an integrated education program for the growing community of young children in the richmond metropolitan area who might be considered at-risk. providing an enriching and academically competitive preschool and after- school…

Education
10
Cat's Cradle of the Shenandoah Valley Inc

Cats cradles mission is to ensure and maintain and safe, compassionate community for cats in the shenandoah valley. we do this by facilitating and promoting spay/neuter and trap, neuter and return (tnr), conducting foster-based rescue and…

Animals
11
Commonwealth Catholic Charities

To provide quality, compassionate human services to all people, especially the most vulnerable, regardless of faith, by empowering individuals, streghening families and building community through faith and service.

Human Services
12
St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families

St. Anns Center helps mothers and children overcome crisis and achieve lasting independence and stability by providing a safe and supportive home, child care, education and employment assistance, and clinical social work services within a…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Richmond Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; the most unlike its peers is Goochland Pet Lovers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $19,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRichmond Animal Welfare League: $15,000 · OtherRichmond Animal Welfare LeagueIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SHEPHERDS CENTER OF RICHMOND: $10,000 · OtherTHE SHEPHERDS CENTER OF RICHMONDACTS: $7,000 · OtherACTSBon Secours Richmond Health Center: $5,000 · OtherBon Secours Richmond Health CenterHenrico Foundation: $5,000 · OtherHenrico FoundationCHAMBLISS CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $3,000 · Other+4 more: $9,000 · Other+4 moreRICHMOND ANIMAL LEAGUE INC: $20,000 · AnimalsRICHMOND ANIMAL LEAG…GOOCHLAND PET LOVERS: $11,500 · AnimalsGOOCHLAND PET LOVERSRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,000 · AnimalsRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR…GREATER RICHMOND SCAN - STOP CHILD ABUSE NOW INC: $28,000 · Crime & LegalGREATER RICHMO…CHATTANOOGA ROOM IN THE INN INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCHATTANOOGA…REAL LIFE: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterREAL LIFEVIRGINIA EARLY CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION: $18,000 · EducationVIRGINIA …MERCY MALL OF VIRGINIA: $3,500 · Human ServicesBethel Bible Village: $3,000 · Human ServicesHOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY I: $2,500 · Human ServicesFostering Acadia: $2,500 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,750 · HealthTAD'S KIDS: $1,500 · HealthFORE CHILDREN INC: $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$87,500Animals$39,500Crime & Legal$28,000Housing & Shelter$23,000Education$18,000Human Services$11,500Health$9,250Recreation & Sports$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER RICHMOND SCAN - STOP CHILD ABUSE NOW INC: $28,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetRICHMOND ANIMAL LEAGUE INC: $20,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCHATTANOOGA ROOM IN THE INN INC: $20,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetVIRGINIA EARLY CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGOOCHLAND PET LOVERS: $11,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE SHEPHERDS CENTER OF RICHMOND: $10,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY MALL OF VIRGINIA: $3,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetREAL LIFE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHAMBLISS CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBethel Bible Village: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY I: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFostering Acadia: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFORE CHILDREN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTAD'S KIDS: $1,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER RICHMOND SCAN - STOP CHILD ABUSE NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND ANIMAL LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHATTANOOGA ROOM IN THE INN INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA EARLY CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOOCHLAND PET LOVERS ↗
  • Who funds THE SHEPHERDS CENTER OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY MALL OF VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds REAL LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CHAMBLISS CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Bethel Bible Village ↗
  • Who funds HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY I ↗
  • Who funds Fostering Acadia ↗
  • Who funds FORE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds TAD'S KIDS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Mraz Charitable TrustVA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Mraz Charitable Trust · The Community Foundation Inc · Carmax Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cathys Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cathys Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cathys Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cathys Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cathys’ filings →

    More from the funding graph