Skip to content
Catholic Charities Community Services Archdiocese of New York at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Catholic Charities Community Services Archdiocese of New York

Catholic charities community services seeks to provide holistic human services that respond to ongoing and emerging needs of new yorkers of all religions.

$8.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$934kFood & Nutrition$216kHealth$202kHousing & Shelter$175kReligion$148kCrime & Legal$75kPhilanthropy$25k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $125,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,750,954 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,625,954 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$63M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARISH ASSISTANCE CORPORATION$100,000
LAVELLE SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $451k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF STATEN ISLAND: $175k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF STATEN ISLAND: $123k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS: $50k → 20%COUNCIL OF PEOPLE'S ORGANIZATION: $12k → 20%ENCORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $59k → 17%ENCORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $31k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 7 repeat orgs$674k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$1.1M
$549k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
0%

Still filing today

86%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF STATEN ISLAND INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $298k · revenue +37%
  • PO
    PART OF THE SOLUTION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $216k · revenue +53%
  • NH
    NAZARETH HOUSING INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $150k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • HN
    HOLY NAME CENTRE
    one grant, 2022 · $148k
  • TN
    The New York and Presbyterian Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $127k · revenue +45%
  • DM
    DROSTE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services Inc

Cases' mission is to increase public safety through innovative services that reduce crime and incarceration, improve behavioral health, promote recovery and rehabilitation, and create opportunities for success in the community. we believe…

—
2
Pibly Residential Programs Inc

Pibly's mission embraces the belief that the needs of its consumers can be met and their goals can be achieved. pibly strives to expand opportunities for people living with mental health challenges by delivering person centered services…

—
3
Lantern Community Services Inc

Lantern community services' mission is to champion the independence and well-being of people who are impacted by or threatened with homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
4
United Bronx Parents Inc

To provide the basic human services necessary for families and individuals to obtain self-proficiency, through dignity in their struggle to participate as the functioning and valuable citizens they inherently are.

Human Services
5
Aids Service Center of Lower Manhattan Inc

Aids service center of lower manhattan, inc., d/b/a alliance for positive change ("alliance") is a not-for-profit community organization founded in 1990 with a central mission of helping low-income new yorkers living with hiv and other…

Health
6
Argus Community Inc

Argus community's mission is to provide innovative programs which help severely disadvantaged teens and adults to free themselves from poverty and drug abuse and build new lives based on responsibility, work, and hope. argus provides a…

Health
7
Forestdale Inc

Forestdale's mission is to ensure that children have the assets they need to thrive.

Human Services
8
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
9
Catholic Charities of Buffalo

For 100 years, catholic charities of buffalo has been providing hope for the most vulnerable and in need in our community. catholic charities is one of the most comprehensive human services organizations serving all eight counties of…

Philanthropy
10
Nysarc Inc New York City Chapter

We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.

Human Services
11
The Young Women's Christian Association of Yonkers

Ywca is dedicated to empowering women and promoting peace, health, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

—
12
New York Common Pantry

New york common pantry reduces hunger while promoting dignity, health and self-sufficiency.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Sisters of the Assumption Family Health Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lavelle Fund for the Blind Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF BROOKLYN: $213,063 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF BROOKLYNHOLY NAME CENTRE: $148,490 · OtherHOLY NAME CENTREPARISH ASSISTANCE CORPORATION: $100,000 · OtherPARISH ASSISTANCE CORPORATIONDROSTE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $75,000 · OtherDROSTE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INCABRAHAM HOUSE: $75,000 · OtherABRAHAM HOUSECATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ORANGE SULLIVAN & ULSTER: $65,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ORANGE SULLIVAN & ULSTERLITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC: $58,750 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF STATEN ISLAND INC: $298,243 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF STATEN…ENCORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $90,264 · Human ServicesENCORE COMMUNITY SERVICESCATHOLIC CHARITIES NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES NEIGHBORH…+1 more: $12,000 · Human ServicesPART OF THE SOLUTION: $216,372 · Food & NutritionPART OF THE S…NAZARETH HOUSING INC: $150,000 · Housing & ShelterNAZARETH HO…XAVIER MISSION INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterXAVIER MISS…The New York and Presbyterian Hospital: $127,127 · HealthMercy Center Inc: $46,773 · Recreation & SportsLAVELLE FUND FOR THE BLIND INC: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$735,303Human Services$450,507Food & Nutrition$216,372Housing & Shelter$175,000Health$127,127Recreation & Sports$46,773Philanthropy$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF STATEN ISLAND INC: $298,243 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPART OF THE SOLUTION: $216,372 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetNAZARETH HOUSING INC: $150,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetThe New York and Presbyterian Hospital: $127,127 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENCORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $90,264 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDROSTE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $75,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ORANGE SULLIVAN & ULSTER: $65,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC: $58,750 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Center Inc: $46,773 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetXAVIER MISSION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLAVELLE FUND FOR THE BLIND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL OF PEOPLES ORGANIZATION INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mother Cabrini Health…Food Bank for New Yor…The Hyde and Watson F…Robin Hood FoundationUnited Way of New Yor…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Paypal Charitable Giv…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…
Mother Cabrini Health Foundation IncNY21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Food Bank for New York City · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · United Way of New York City · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Catholic Charities Community Services Archdiocese of New York funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Catholic Charities Community Services Archdiocese of New York. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Catholic Charities Community Services Archdiocese of New York’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home