Skip to content

· Private foundation

Castner Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$3k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Castner Family Foundation’s FY2026 grant dollars went to Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2026 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2025, the last year Castner Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $7k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
0
’18
2
’19
1
’20
3
’21
1
’22
4
’23
0
’24
11
’25
0
’26

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$11kArts & Culture$11kPhilanthropy$5kHealth$3kEnvironment$3kInternational$2kCivil Rights$2kReligion$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOUNT AMWELL PROJECT INCORPORATED$2,500
PATRIOTS' PATH COUNCIL INC$1,000
JOHNS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC$500
ALEX'S LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION FOR CHILDHOOD CANCER$500
PROJECT BEAUTIFUL$500
KERSHAWS CHALLENGE$500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$500
VNA HOSPICE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC$250
FLOAT HOPE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC$200
DIVINE GRACE$200
VERO BEACH POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION INC$100
70 LOCAL MORRIS TWP$100
MORRIS MINUTE MEN INC$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Seeing Eye: $100 → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17k · 7 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call). Read against FY2025, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
25

Total granted

$17k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+11%

Still filing today

29%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MOUNT AMWELL PROJECT INCORPORATED
    2× · 2023–2025 · $8k
  • UA
    UCLA Anderson School
    3× · 2017–2022 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2018–2019 · $2k

Funded once

  • PA
    PRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +11%
  • MU
    Mount Union Project
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • UA
    UCLA Anderson Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
The Ironman Foundation Inc

To leave ironman's legacy through philanthropy, volunteerism and grant making; by supporting various athletic, community, education, health, human services and public benefit non-profit organizations around the world.

Philanthropy
3
Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Conquer cancer funds research for every type of cancer to benefit every patient, everywhere. working in collaboration with a global network of top scientists and clinicians, and leading advocacy and research organizations, conquer cancer…

Health
4
Pines of Sarasota Foundation Inc

Pines of sarasota foundation secures funding to provide compassionate care, vital resources, and financial assistance for the seniors, children, and the nursing community serving them.

Health
5
Trustbridge Foundation Inc

The mission is to raise and manage charitable donations to support nonprofit end of life care provider trustbridge, inc and its subsidiaries, including hospice of palm beach county and hospice by the sea. these hospice entities provided…

Human Services
6
The Folded Flag Foundation

The mission of the folded flag foundation is to provide scholarships and educational support grants to the spouses and children of the united states military and government personnel who died as a result of hostile action or in an accident…

Public Benefit
7
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. supports national public radio, inc.'s international news-gathering activities through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

—
8
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation (foundation) is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. (npr). the foundation supports npr through various activities (e.g., conducting…

—
9
Usf Research Foundation Inc

To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.

Education
10
Fleet landing Endowment Fund Inc

Fleet landing endowment fund, inc. is organized to provide financial assistance to residents of naval continuing care retirement foundation, inc. d/b/a fleet landing and to assist in the expansion of its resident service programs to secure…

Philanthropy
11
The Nemours Foundation

Nemours' mission is to provide leadership, institutions, and services to restore and improve the health of children through care and programs not readily available, with one high standard of quality and distinction regardless of the…

Health
12
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seeing Eye Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yellow Ribbon Girls. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
8/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $84,494 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc+2 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyMOUNT AMWELL PROJECT INCORPORATED: $7,500 · OtherMOUNT AMWELL PROJECT INCORPO…Mount Union Project: $5,000 · OtherMount Union ProjectUCLA Anderson School: $3,500 · OtherUCLA Anderson SchoolUCLA Anderson Foundation: $2,500 · OtherUCLA Anderson FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · Other+27 more: $12,350 · Other+27 morePRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC: $5,000 · EducationMENDHAM BOROUGH LIBRARY: $1,500 · EducationAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 · HealthGOOD GRIEF INC: $500 · HealthTHE BRAIN TUMOR NETWORK INC: $250 · HealthDOGS FOR LIFE INC: $500 · AnimalsFLOAT HOPE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC: $200 · Recreation & SportsTHE SEEING EYE INC: $100 · Human ServicesTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $100 · Environment
Philanthropy$86,494Other$32,350Education$6,500Health$1,250Animals$500Recreation & Sports$200Human Services$100Environment$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMENDHAM BOROUGH LIBRARY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOGS FOR LIFE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD GRIEF INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRAIN TUMOR NETWORK INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVNA Hospice of Indian River County Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLOAT HOPE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYELLOW RIBBON GIRLS: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMORRIS MINUTE MEN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERO BEACH POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MENDHAM BOROUGH LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds KERSHAW'S CHALLENGE ↗
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOGS FOR LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD GRIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRAIN TUMOR NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds VNA Hospice of Indian River County Inc ↗
  • Who funds FLOAT HOPE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds YELLOW RIBBON GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds MORRIS MINUTE MEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationNJ10.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Castner Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Castner Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    9get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Castner Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph