Skip to content
Cassidy and Carin Phillips Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Cassidy and Carin Phillips Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$83kHealth$60kReligion$49kPhilanthropy$30kArts & Culture$21kEducation$17kHuman Services$11kRecreation & Sports$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,032
Median grant
11
States reached
$867k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEAF ACTION CENTER OF LOUISIANA$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$4,563
PHOENIX SOCIETY FOR BURN SURVIVORS$3,219
FILM PRIZE FOUNDATION INC$3,159
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$3,000
COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES$2,500
JOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES$2,250
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY$2,067
ST MATHEWS HOUSE$2,000
WORLD CONCERN$1,054
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$1,046
DAVID LAWRENCE CENTERS FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$1,037
WORLD HELP$1,032
TEXAS SEARCH AND RESCUE$1,029
HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK$726
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $515 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $515 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $512 → 14%PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 10%VALERIE'S HOUSE: $1k → 10%VALERIE'S HOUSE: $515 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
MI
NY
OH
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$272k · 30 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
26

Total granted

$272k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+22%

Still filing today

70%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $76k · revenue +134%
  • PS
    PHOENIX SOCIETY INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $23k · revenue +18%
  • FP
    FILM PRIZE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $12k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • TB
    THE BETTY & LEONARD PHILLIPS DEAF ACTION CENTER OF LOUISIANA
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
Chief Executives for Corporate Purpose Inc

Chief executives for corporate purpose (cecp) is the only business counsel and network dedicated to driving measurable returns on purpose. we promote responsible purpose-driven business as it increases customer loyalty, builds employee…

Philanthropy
4
Florida Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.

—
5
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
6
Heart of Florida United Way Inc

The mission of heart of florida united way is to improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our communities. this is accomplished by standing up for the health, education, and financial stability of every person in central florida.

Philanthropy
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
The Fund for Peace Inc

Building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. a leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, the fund for peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing…

International
9
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
10
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
11
Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc

Philanthropic collaborative focused on improving lives through just & inclusive systems change.

Philanthropy
12
The Leadership Foundation

The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Village School of Naples Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cordonate. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/36
Grantees still filing
24/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES INC: $26,000 · OtherJOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES INCPHOENIX SOCIETY INC: $22,519 · OtherPHOENIX SOCIETY INCDEAF ACTION CENTER: $15,250 · OtherDEAF ACTION CENTERDEAF ACTION CENTER OF LOUISIANA: $12,000 · OtherDEAF ACTION CENTER OF LOUISIANAFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF NAPLES INC: $9,650 · OtherTHE BETTY & LEONARD PHILLIPS DEAF ACTION CENTER OF LOUISIANA: $7,745 · OtherPATH2FREEDOM INC: $8,043 · Other1 Life Fully Lived: $7,680 · Other+32 more: $63,121 · Other+32 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $75,503 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEWorld Help: $3,832 · Religion+1 more: $1,020 · ReligionCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH LOUISIANA: $15,745 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY …SOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $11,530 · PhilanthropySOUTHWEST …STARABILITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,587 · PhilanthropySTARABILIT…THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $2,067 · PhilanthropyVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $2,133 · Philanthropy+3 moreFILM PRIZE FOUNDATION INC: $12,259 · Arts & CultureSHREVEPORT REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL: $10,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL UNDERGROUND RAILROAD FREEDOM CENTER INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,066 · Arts & CultureTHE VILLAGE SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC: $10,750 · EducationGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC: $3,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC: $2,500 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $7,125 · Human ServicesPARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 · Human ServicesVALERIE'S HOUSE INC: $1,545 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,530 · Human ServicesST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $8,142 · Housing & Shelter
Other$222,008Religion$80,355Philanthropy$39,062Arts & Culture$25,825Education$16,250Human Services$12,200Housing & Shelter$8,142

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $75,503 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX SOCIETY INC: $22,519 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH LOUISIANA: $15,745 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFILM PRIZE FOUNDATION INC: $12,259 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $11,530 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VILLAGE SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC: $10,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHREVEPORT REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL: $10,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $8,142 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPATH2FREEDOM INC: $8,043 over 6y, 0.4% of budget1 Life Fully Lived: $7,680 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $7,125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRED OAK HOPE: $6,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSTARABILITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,587 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $3,925 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Help: $3,832 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $2,067 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPathways Early Education Center of Immokalee Inc: $2,030 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL UNDERGROUND RAILROAD FREEDOM CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $1,976 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $1,773 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVALERIE'S HOUSE INC: $1,545 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,530 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT AUSTIN FOUNDATION: $1,288 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,066 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $330 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Fou…Servant FoundationThe Signatry Charitab…Morgan Stanley Global…Christian Community F…National Philanthropi…Baird Foundation IncRaymond James Charita…The Blackbaud Giving …United Way WorldwideThe US Charitable Gif…The Chicago Community…
Collier Community Foundation IncFL17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · United Way Worldwide · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Chicago Community Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cassidy and Carin Phillips Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cassidy and Carin Phillips Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Valerie's House Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cassidy and Carin Phillips’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home