Skip to content

· Private foundation

Casey Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.2MReligion$225kHealth$61kEducation$56kYouth Development$35kInternational$25kArts & Culture$21kPhilanthropy$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
South Hills Interfaith Movement$20,000
Mainstay Life Services$5,000
412 Food Rescue$5,000
Dougbe River Presbyterian School$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIGHT OF LIFE: $5k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%GENESIS OF PITTSBURGH INC: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
KY
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$465k · 14 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
24

Total granted

$465k
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+1%

Still filing today

64%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementReligionRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $115k · revenue +105%
  • PK
    PITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $95k · revenue +32%
  • CC
    CASEY'S CLUBHOUSE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • CC
    CASEYS CLUBHOUSE FNDT
    one grant, 2020 · $1.1M
  • EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +65%
  • CM
    CLEMENT MUSEUM
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
2
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
3
Relief International Inc

Relief international (ri) partners with communities impacted by conflict, climate change, and disaster to save lives, build greater resilience, and promote long-term health and wellbeing of people in the communities that we serve. relief…

International
4
The Arc Baltimore Inc

The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.

Human Services
5
Refugepoint Inc

Refugepoint partners with refugees to access life-changing solutions and transforms how the world supports them. refugepoint seeks to expand access to lasting solutions for refugees, especially those facing vulnerabilities who are…

International
6
Search for Change Inc

Dedicated to improving the quality of life and increasing the self sufficiency of individuals with emotional, social and economic barriers. this is accomplished by providing direct support and assistance needed to enable individuals to…

Human Services
7
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
8
Oneblood Inc

To enhance the health and well-being of others through our work with blood and stem cell products and by facilitating scientific research

Health
9
Options Inc

Options has been improving the lives of hundreds of people with disabilities through maximizing life skills, meaningful work and activities, community inclusion, and providing support beyond the family.

Human Services
10
Pittsburgh Community Services Inc

Provide programs to help individuals and/or families achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
11
Mercy Life Center Corporation

We, pittsburgh mercy health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy life center is a member of pittsburgh mercy health system…

Health
12
Everylife Foundation for Rare Diseases

Information regarding the foundation's programs can be obtained at www.everylifefoundation.org.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pittsburgh Kids Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Choices for Recovery Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CASEYS CLUBHOUSE FNDT: $1,111,687 · OtherCASEYS CLUBHOUSE FNDT+30 more: $219,971 · Other+30 moreSOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $115,000 · ReligionSOUTH HILLS I…PITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $95,000 · ReligionPITTSBURGH KI…CASEY'S CLUBHOUSE: $80,000 · Recreation & SportsTEDS FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $30,000 · EducationEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC: $20,000 · HealthCHOICES FOR RECOVERY INC: $10,000 · HealthTHE CINCINNATI REDS COMMUNITY FUND: $10,000 · Community ImprovementMcAllen Rotary Club: $7,500 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $6,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,331,658Religion$210,000Recreation & Sports$80,000Youth Development$35,000Education$30,000Health$30,000Community Improvement$23,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $115,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $95,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCASEY'S CLUBHOUSE: $80,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetTEDS FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetESPERANZA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMAINSTAY LIFE SERVICES: $19,706 over 4y, 0.0% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHOICES FOR RECOVERY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 89% of budgetHACKERS FOR HOPE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE CINCINNATI REDS COMMUNITY FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL LIFELINE PITTSBURGH: $6,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOISE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,076 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENESIS OF PITTSBURGH INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CASEY'S CLUBHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds TEDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds ESPERANZA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds MAINSTAY LIFE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds 412 FOOD RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHOICES FOR RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds HACKERS FOR HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CINCINNATI REDS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds McAllen Rotary Club ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL LIFELINE PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds POISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds GENESIS OF PITTSBURGH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Casey's Clubhouse Foundation IncPA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Casey's Clubhouse Foundation Inc · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Casey Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Casey Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Casey Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Casey Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Casey Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph