Skip to content

· Private foundation

Casey 4522 Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$94kHealth$45kHuman Services$32kEducation$25kCivil Rights$12kCommunity Improvement$12kFood & Nutrition$6kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $82k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Queen of Apostles Catholic Church$16,000
Queen of Apostles Catholic School$15,000
KOVAR Corporation$8,500
Annandale Christian Community for Action$8,000
A Woman's Choice$5,000
Marih Center$5,000
Associates of John Bosco$5,000
Mother of Light Center$5,000
Apostles of Jesus - Fr Amaruma$5,000
Assist Pregnacy Resource Center$5,000
Mater Ecclesiae Fund for Vocations$5,000
Mother of Mercy Free Medical Clinic$5,000
Knights of Columbus Charities$3,500
Virginia Knights of Columbus Charities Inc$3,500
Sisters of Blessed Sacrament$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KOVAR Corporation: $9k → 8%Virginia Knights of Columbus Charities Inc: $4k → 17%KOVAR Corporation: $3k → 8%Virginia Knights of Columbus Charities Inc: $3k → 17%KOVAR Corporation: $1k → 8%Associates of John Bosco: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
PA
NJ
CT
WV
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$273k · 21 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
9

Total granted

$273k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+69%

Still filing today

33%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementInternationalReligionRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KOVAR CORPORATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $12k · revenue +31%
  • AW
    A WOMAN'S CHOICE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $9k · revenue +14%
  • ME
    MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $9k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • KO
    KOVAR-KNIGHT OF VA AIDING THE RETARDED
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • SO
    SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +69%
  • AO
    Apostles of Jesus Mission Office
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund Inc

Knights of columbus charitable fund promotes and facilitates philanthropic activities of individuals and organizations by serving as a sponsoring organization through the establishment and administration of donor-advised funds and other…

Philanthropy
2
Knights of Columbus

Empowering catholic men to live their faith at home, in their parish, at work and in their community.

—
3
Catholic Charities of Corpus Christi Inc

To provide service to people in need and to address social ills that undermind the dignity of the person. the ultimate goal of catholic charities is to create positive life changing opportunities for those in need without regard to color,…

—
4
Congregation of the Sisters of St Joseph Ministries Inc

To exercise the civil and canonical responsibilities for various sponsored ministries of the congregation. csj ministries is the member for ministries that are civilly incorporated and oversees the governance and operations of such…

—
5
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
6
Sjmc Inc

Sjmc, inc's primary mission is to provide support to many organizations in the greater yonkers, ny area. sjmc, inc is a non-profit corporation set up under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code that is the parent corporation of…

—
7
Commonwealth Catholic Charities

To provide quality, compassionate human services to all people, especially the most vulnerable, regardless of faith, by empowering individuals, streghening families and building community through faith and service.

Human Services
8
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
9
Knights of Columbus St Augustine Council 41

The knights of columbus is a catholic men's organization that aims to support its members and their families, promote charitable works, and serve the community.

—
10
Mother Teresa Shelter Inc

To provide comprehensive, community-based outreach services to homeless individuals and families, by creating opportunities that will help break the cycle of homelessness.

—
11
Catholic Charities of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Paterson Inc

To provide assistance to its related organizations in supporting the needy.

—
12
Catholic Charities Corporation

Respond to those in need through an integrated system of quality services designed to respect the dignity of every person and build a just and compassionate society.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is A Woman's Choice. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALL OTHERS UNDER 5000 EACH: $50,140 · OtherALL OTHERS UNDER 5000 EACHQueen of Apostles Catholic Church: $48,300 · OtherQueen of Apostles Catholic ChurchVARIOUS OTHER ORGANIZATIONS - ALL 1000 OR LESS: $30,942 · OtherVARIOUS OTHER ORGANIZATIONS - ALL 1000 OR LESSQueen of Apostles Catholic School: $17,000 · OtherQueen of Apostles Catholic SchoolAnnandale Christian Community for Action: $12,000 · OtherQUEEN OF APOSTLES CHURCH & SCHOOL: $8,750 · Other+22 more: $88,894 · Other+22 moreKOVAR CORPORATION: $12,000 · Human ServicesVIRGINIA KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesAssociates of St John Bosco Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesMother of Light Center: $8,500 · Community ImprovementKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC: $3,500 · Community ImprovementMATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC: $8,500 · ReligionFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $3,500 · InternationalSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $3,000 · InternationalNATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERY: $5,000 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$256,026Human Services$23,000Community Improvement$12,000Religion$8,500International$6,500Health$5,000Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKOVAR CORPORATION: $12,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetA WOMAN'S CHOICE: $8,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMother of Light Center: $8,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetVIRGINIA KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC: $6,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAssociates of St John Bosco Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KOVAR CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds A WOMAN'S CHOICE ↗
  • Who funds MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Mother of Light Center ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Associates of St John Bosco Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Casey 4522 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Casey 4522 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Casey 4522 Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Casey 4522 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Casey 4522’s filings →

More from the funding graph