· Private foundation
Casey 4522 Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k21 grants · $82k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Queen of Apostles Catholic Church | $16,000 |
| Queen of Apostles Catholic School | $15,000 |
| KOVAR Corporation | $8,500 |
| Annandale Christian Community for Action | $8,000 |
| Associates of John Bosco | $5,000 |
| Apostles of Jesus - Fr Amaruma | $5,000 |
| Mother of Mercy Free Medical Clinic | $5,000 |
| A Woman's Choice | $5,000 |
| Marih Center | $5,000 |
| Mother of Light Center | $5,000 |
| Mater Ecclesiae Fund for Vocations | $5,000 |
| Assist Pregnacy Resource Center | $5,000 |
| Virginia Knights of Columbus Charities Inc | $3,500 |
| Knights of Columbus Charities | $3,500 |
| St Vincent DePaul Food Bank | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KCKOVAR CORPORATION3× · 2023–2025 · $12k · revenue +31%
- AWA WOMAN'S CHOICE3× · 2023–2025 · $9k · revenue +14%
- MEMATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC3× · 2023–2025 · $9k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- KOKOVAR-KNIGHT OF VA AIDING THE RETARDEDone grant, 2017 · $3k
- SOSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INCone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
- AOApostles of Jesus Mission Officeone grant, 2023 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Knights of columbus charitable fund promotes and facilitates philanthropic activities of individuals and organizations by serving as a sponsoring organization through the establishment and administration of donor-advised funds and other…
Empowering catholic men to live their faith at home, in their parish, at work and in their community.
To provide service to people in need and to address social ills that undermind the dignity of the person. the ultimate goal of catholic charities is to create positive life changing opportunities for those in need without regard to color,…
To exercise the civil and canonical responsibilities for various sponsored ministries of the congregation. csj ministries is the member for ministries that are civilly incorporated and oversees the governance and operations of such…
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
Sjmc, inc's primary mission is to provide support to many organizations in the greater yonkers, ny area. sjmc, inc is a non-profit corporation set up under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code that is the parent corporation of…
To provide quality, compassionate human services to all people, especially the most vulnerable, regardless of faith, by empowering individuals, streghening families and building community through faith and service.
At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…
The knights of columbus is a catholic men's organization that aims to support its members and their families, promote charitable works, and serve the community.
To provide comprehensive, community-based outreach services to homeless individuals and families, by creating opportunities that will help break the cycle of homelessness.
To provide assistance to its related organizations in supporting the needy.
Respond to those in need through an integrated system of quality services designed to respect the dignity of every person and build a just and compassionate society.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is A Woman's Choice. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KOVAR CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds A WOMAN'S CHOICE ↗
- Who funds MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Mother of Light Center ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Associates of St John Bosco Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
- Who funds SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Casey 4522 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Casey 4522 Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Casey 4522 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.