Skip to content
Carson-Tahoe Health System at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Carson-Tahoe Health System

CARSON-TAHOE HEALTH SYSTEM is the parent company of four entities.

$127k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$5.1MFood & Nutrition$216kEnvironment$202kHuman Services$100kYouth Development$65kArts & Culture$62kRecreation & Sports$45kReligion$20kOther$0
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $92,198, the rows itemized in this filing. The $127,264 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,066 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$27,198
Median grant
1
States reached
$370M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEVADA URBAN INDIANS$30,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$27,198
NEVADA RURAL COUNTIES RSVP PROGRAM$25,000
CENTER FOR HOPE & HEALING$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SPIRIT OF HOPE: $11k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of Carson-Tahoe Health System’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Carson-Tahoe Health Systemlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$4.6M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$4.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+87%

Still filing today

75%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GREENHOUSE PROJECT
    3× · 2018–2021 · $299k · revenue +51% · 78% of their budget
  • RW
    RON WOOD FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER
    2× · 2021–2022 · $200k · revenue +126%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $187k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CT
    CARSON TAHOE CONTINUING CARE HOSPITAL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $4.5M · revenue -52% · 47% of their budget
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MASON VALLEYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +104%
  • SO
    SPIRIT OF HOPE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthy Nevada
Health
2
Nevada Agricultural Foundation
Food & Nutrition
3
Nevada Wild Horses

Wild horse protection, preservation, rescue and care work.

Animals
4
The Nevada Bighorns Foundation
Education
5
Washoe Barton Medical Clinic

Our mission is to care for your health and wellness. Our vision is to strengthen our community by providing accessible, affordable, high quality healthcare to all.

Health
6
Partnership Carson City

The organization is a coalition that dedicates assistance to various organizations for the purpose of maintaining a safe and healthy community in carson city nevada by preventing involvement in and reversing the effects of gangs, drugs,…

Youth Development
7
Carson City Senior Citizen's Center Inc

To enhance the quality of life and autonomy of individuals 60+ through the facilitation and provision of a broad continuum of services and support including: nutrition, activities, information and referral, education, opportunity for peer…

Human Services
8
Carson-Tahoe Health System

Carson-tahoe health system is the parent company of four entities. we exist to facilitate those affiliates so they are able to enhance the health and well being of the communities we serve.

Health
9
Canyonlands Community Health Center

The mission of canyonlands healthcare is to promote healthier lives through affordable, accessible, integrated primary care.

—
10
Carson Valley Health Foundation

None

Health
11
Nevada Veterans Memorial Plaza

To honor and preserve the legacy of our fallen brothers and sisters who have given their life in service to our country since nevada became a state in 1864

Arts & Culture
12
John Muir Health

The mission of john muir is to improve the health of the communities we serve with quality and compassion.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Western Nevada; the most unlike its peers is Brewery Arts Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CARSON TAHOE CONTINUING CARE HOSPITAL INC: $4,550,000 · OtherCARSON TAHOE CONTINUING CARE HOSPITAL INC+10 more: $433,728 · Other+10 moreTHE GREENHOUSE PROJECT: $298,975 · EnvironmentRON WOOD FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $200,000 · Crime & LegalAmerican Heart Association Inc: $186,800 · HealthMammoth Hospital Foundation: $7,500 · HealthNEVADA RURAL COUNTIES RSVP INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureBREWERY ARTS CENTER: $30,000 · Arts & CultureCHANNEL 5 PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $16,417 · Arts & CultureBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MASON VALLEY: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentNevada Nurses Foundation: $13,300 · Human ServicesSPIRIT OF HOPE INC: $10,518 · Human Services
Other$4,983,728Environment$298,975Crime & Legal$200,000Health$194,300Arts & Culture$146,417Youth Development$25,000Human Services$23,818

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCARSON TAHOE CONTINUING CARE HOSPITAL INC: $4,550,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetTHE GREENHOUSE PROJECT: $298,975 over 3y, 78% of budgetRON WOOD FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $200,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $186,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA URBAN INDIANS INC: $150,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $119,538 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA RURAL COUNTIES RSVP INC: $100,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Western Nevada: $40,300 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBREWERY ARTS CENTER: $30,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MASON VALLEY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHANNEL 5 PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $16,417 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNevada Nurses Foundation: $13,300 over 2y, 17% of budgetSPIRIT OF HOPE INC: $10,518 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAN YOUTH SOCCER ORGANIZATION: $9,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMammoth Hospital Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMain Street Gardnerville: $5,170 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NV Energy Charitable …Robert Z Hawkins Foun…The E L Cord Foundati…John Ben Snow Memoria…Community Foundation …The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
NV Energy Charitable FoundationNV21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carson-Tahoe Health System funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carson-Tahoe Health System. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carson-Tahoe Health System’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home