· Public charity
Carson-Tahoe Health System
CARSON-TAHOE HEALTH SYSTEM is the parent company of four entities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $92,198 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $127,264 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $35,066 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEVADA URBAN INDIANS | $30,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $27,198 |
| NEVADA RURAL COUNTIES RSVP PROGRAM | $25,000 |
| CENTER FOR HOPE & HEALING | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 21% of Carson-Tahoe Health System’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TGTHE GREENHOUSE PROJECT3× · 2018–2021 · $299k · revenue +51% · 78% of their budget
- RWRON WOOD FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER2× · 2021–2022 · $200k · revenue +126%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc4× · 2017–2020 · $187k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- CTCARSON TAHOE CONTINUING CARE HOSPITAL INCone grant, 2021 · $4.5M · revenue -52% · 47% of their budget
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MASON VALLEYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +104%
- SOSPIRIT OF HOPE INCone grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue +16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wild horse protection, preservation, rescue and care work.
Our mission is to care for your health and wellness. Our vision is to strengthen our community by providing accessible, affordable, high quality healthcare to all.
The organization is a coalition that dedicates assistance to various organizations for the purpose of maintaining a safe and healthy community in carson city nevada by preventing involvement in and reversing the effects of gangs, drugs,…
To enhance the quality of life and autonomy of individuals 60+ through the facilitation and provision of a broad continuum of services and support including: nutrition, activities, information and referral, education, opportunity for peer…
Carson-tahoe health system is the parent company of four entities. we exist to facilitate those affiliates so they are able to enhance the health and well being of the communities we serve.
The mission of canyonlands healthcare is to promote healthier lives through affordable, accessible, integrated primary care.
None
To honor and preserve the legacy of our fallen brothers and sisters who have given their life in service to our country since nevada became a state in 1864
The mission of john muir is to improve the health of the communities we serve with quality and compassion.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Western Nevada and the most unlike its peers is Brewery Arts Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CARSON TAHOE CONTINUING CARE HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE GREENHOUSE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds RON WOOD FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds NEVADA URBAN INDIANS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds NEVADA RURAL COUNTIES RSVP INC ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Clubs of Western Nevada ↗
- Who funds BREWERY ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MASON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds CHANNEL 5 PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
- Who funds Nevada Nurses Foundation ↗
- Who funds SPIRIT OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds CARSON VALLEY BALLOON FESTIVAL HOT AIR FOR HOPE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN YOUTH SOCCER ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds Mammoth Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds Main Street Gardnerville ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Carson-Tahoe Health System funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.