· Private foundation
Carrie and David Schulman Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of CARRIE AND DAVID SCHULMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k26 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $71k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY | $35,315 |
| NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY | $16,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| CAN DO MS | $10,000 |
| JEWISH GEN | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| SUNRISE ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| EMERGENCY VOLUNTEER PROJECT | $3,600 |
| OHR TORAH STONE | $3,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,800 |
| CIRCLE OF CARE | $2,500 |
| HANDY-LILIAN WELLS CENTER | $2,500 |
| SOUTH FLORIDA SYMPHONY | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BSBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC7× · 2018–2024 · $132k · revenue +22%
- FOFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC3× · 2021–2023 · $75k · revenue +55%
- CDCan Do Multiple Sclerosis5× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $10k
- BPBROWARD PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESSone grant, 2018 · $8k
- LELEAD EXPOSURE ELIMINATION PROJECTone grant, 2022 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…
The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids in Distress Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tap Cancer Out Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES ↗
- Who funds Can Do Multiple Sclerosis ↗
- Who funds HILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOLOCAUST DOCUMENTATION AND EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel ↗
- Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SHE SHOULD RUN ↗
- Who funds FOOD FORWARD INC ↗
- Who funds THE CLEO INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BROWARD CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation ↗
- Who funds JEWISH GEN INC ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDNET INC ↗
- Who funds COACHARTORG ↗
- Who funds NO LIMITS FOUNDATION D/B/A CAMP NO LIMITS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Community Foundation of Broward Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Herbert and Gertrude Halverstadt Foundation · Florida Panthers Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · American Gift Fund · Aetna Foundation Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · The Miami Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Carrie and David Schulman Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Berkshire Medical Center Inc — 4% of income from government
- Broward Childrens Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Yehudi Inc — 0% of income from government
- Kids in Distress Inc — 0% of income from government
- South Florida Pbs Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.