Skip to content
Carrie and David Schulman Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Carrie and David Schulman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$120k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$233kHealth$89kPhilanthropy$57kReligion$52kHuman Services$38kInternational$28kEnvironment$15kCivil Rights$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $71k
$2,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$964k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY$35,315
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$16,000
CAN DO MS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
JEWISH GEN$5,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SUNRISE ASSOCIATION$5,000
EMERGENCY VOLUNTEER PROJECT$3,600
OHR TORAH STONE$3,600
Individual grant recipient$2,800
HANDY-LILIAN WELLS CENTER$2,500
CIRCLE OF CARE$2,500
SOUTH FLORIDA SYMPHONY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 6%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $1k → 12%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 6%SHE SHOULD RUN: $6k → 14%DEBBIE'S DREAM FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%CHILD NET: $4k → 13%VICTORY LIVING PROGRAM: $500 → 13%KIDS IN DISTRESS: $700 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$416k · 23 repeat orgs$210k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
77

Total granted

$416k
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+29%

Still filing today

61%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $132k · revenue +22%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $75k · revenue +55%
  • CD
    Can Do Multiple Sclerosis
    5× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • LE
    LEAD EXPOSURE ELIMINATION PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • BP
    BROWARD PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
8
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
11
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
12
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids in Distress Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tap Cancer Out Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/64
Grantees still filing
48/64
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $33,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $24,245 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCan Do Multiple Sclerosis: $24,200 · OtherCan Do Multiple SclerosisHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC: $17,136 · OtherHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INCNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $16,860 · OtherNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETYSIMCHA CONNECTION INC: $14,200 · OtherHANDY-LILIAN WELLS CENTER: $14,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD: $11,000 · Other+67 more: $160,769 · Other+67 moreBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC: $131,715 · EducationBARRINGTON STAGE COMPA…+2 more: $2,200 · EducationFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITE…HOLOCAUST DOCUMENTATION AND EDUCATION CENTER INC: $9,500 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST DOCUME…SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $8,360 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL…+3 more: $2,560 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES: $45,160 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL LIFELINE FUND: $3,500 · PhilanthropyThe Against Malaria Foundation: $5,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · HealthBROWARD CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $5,000 · HealthNO LIMITS FOUNDATION D/B/A CAMP NO LIMITS: $4,000 · HealthAIM AT MELANOMA: $3,000 · HealthCIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH CANCER INC: $2,500 · HealthFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $1,800 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,500 · Health+10 more: $5,190 · HealthSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSHE SHOULD RUN: $6,000 · Human ServicesCHILDNET INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesDEBBIE'S DREAM FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $1,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,200 · Human ServicesISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $7,500 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $5,000 · InternationalGabriel Project Mumbai: $3,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $2,360 · InternationalFUND FOR NEW WORLD DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,000 · International+1 more: $460 · International
Other$315,410Education$133,915Arts & Culture$95,420Philanthropy$48,660Health$32,990Human Services$25,200International$19,320

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC: $131,715 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES: $45,160 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCan Do Multiple Sclerosis: $24,200 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC: $17,136 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST DOCUMENTATION AND EDUCATION CENTER INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $8,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $8,360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEO INSTITUTE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD FORWARD INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHE SHOULD RUN: $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Against Malaria Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWARD CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNO LIMITS FOUNDATION D/B/A CAMP NO LIMITS: $4,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOACHARTORG: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDNET INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LIFELINE FUND: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAIM AT MELANOMA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEBBIE'S DREAM FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH CANCER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $2,360 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMICHAEL MOSIER DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAIMONIDES SHALOM ACADEMY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGABLESTAGE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYehudi Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR NEW WORLD DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC: $860 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS IN DISTRESS INC: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES ↗
  • Who funds Can Do Multiple Sclerosis ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST DOCUMENTATION AND EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEO INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FORWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds SHE SHOULD RUN ↗
  • Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH GEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWARD CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NO LIMITS FOUNDATION D/B/A CAMP NO LIMITS ↗
  • Who funds COACHARTORG ↗
  • Who funds CHILDNET INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Express Foun…Jewish Communal FundCommunity Foundation …The Pfizer Foundation…Herbert and Gertrude …Florida Panthers Foun…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Jim Moran Foundat…American Gift FundAetna Foundation IncGreater Miami Jewish …The Miami Foundation …
American Express FoundationNY16.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Community Foundation of Broward Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Herbert and Gertrude Halverstadt Foundation · Florida Panthers Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · American Gift Fund · Aetna Foundation Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · The Miami Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carrie and David Schulman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carrie and David Schulman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Berkshire Medical Center Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Broward Childrens Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Yehudi Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Kids in Distress Inc: 0% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carrie and David Schulman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home