Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carolyn and Michael M Minchin Jr Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$211k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$131k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$603kReligion$392kHealth$106kYouth Development$63kHuman Services$49kInternational$37kScience & Tech$3kRecreation & Sports$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $131k
$11,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL$131,200
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC$16,000
FULL GOSPEL FELLOWSHIP OF CHURCHES$12,000
YOUNG LIFE$11,000
SHELTERING WINGS$10,440
FRIENDS OF COMPTON YAL$10,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$10,000
NOVO MISSION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHELTERING WINGS: $19k → 15%SHELTERING WINGS: $14k → 15%SHELTERING WINGS: $10k → 15%SHELTERING WINGS: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
CO
MO
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 16 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
14

Total granted

$1.1M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+19%

Still filing today

31%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHealthHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $498k · revenue +154%
  • SW
    SHELTERING WINGS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $49k · revenue +21%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF COMPTON YAL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • BU
    BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $14k · revenue +19%
  • LO
    Loving On Purpose
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -4%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
4
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
5
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
6
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
7
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
8
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
9
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
10
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
11
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
12
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Stars. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $497,950 · EducationPACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOLUCLA FOUNDATION: $69,450 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION+6 more: $32,300 · Education+6 moreFull Gospel Fellowship Of Churches: $152,000 · OtherFull Gospel Fellowship Of ChurchesST JOHN'S HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER FO: $105,500 · OtherST JOHN'S HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER FOVINEYARD CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $95,000 · OtherVINEYARD CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIPCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $79,516 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INCB2 THE WORLD: $37,000 · OtherB2 THE WORLDNOVO MISSION INC: $22,000 · OtherLIFE OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHURCHES INC: $20,080 · Other+11 more: $26,023 · OtherFRIENDS OF COMPTON YAL INC: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $28,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHELTERING WINGS INC: $48,735 · Human ServicesLoving On Purpose: $10,000 · ReligionTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $250 · Health
Education$599,700Other$537,119Youth Development$63,000Human Services$48,735Religion$10,000Health$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $497,950 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $69,450 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERING WINGS INC: $48,735 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF COMPTON YAL INC: $35,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $28,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $13,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLoving On Purpose: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetINNER CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITY MIDDLE COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES OF AMERICA RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION LTD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAM HIGH FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERING WINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF COMPTON YAL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Loving On Purpose ↗
  • Who funds INNER CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds UNITY MIDDLE COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds STARS ↗
  • Who funds TAM HIGH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carolyn and Michael M Minchin Jr Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carolyn and Michael M Minchin Jr Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carolyn and Michael M Minchin Jr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph