Skip to content
Carmen J Moore Charitable Trust Karen C Hopkins Trustee at a glance

· Private foundation

Carmen J Moore Charitable Trust Karen C Hopkins Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$83kHealth$25kRecreation & Sports$20kEducation$14kYouth Development$12kCrime & Legal$10kAnimals$8kCommunity Improvement$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$326k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$12,000
YOUTH ALIVE$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$2,000
LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA$2,000
YOUTH UPRISING$1,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT ATTN DEVELOPMENT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NORCAL INTERSCHLOASTIC CYCLING LEAGUE: $3k → 8%BICYCLE TRAILS COUNCIL OF EAST: $5k → 9%YOUTH ALIVE: $10k → 10%THE TREVOR PROJECT ATTN DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 14%NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 18%HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%SISKIYOU SINGERS: $500 → 13%BICYCLE TRAILS COUNCIL OF EAST: $4k → 9%FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 10%THE TREVOR PROJECT ATTN DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 14%SCIENCE WORKS ASHLAND: $100 → 13%FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 10%THE TREVOR PROJECT ATTN DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 14%DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES: $3k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY: $2k → 10%DOGS FOR THE DEAF: $2k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY: $2k → 10%DOGS FOR THE DEAF: $2k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY: $1k → 10%HACK THE HOOD: $2k → 10%AMETHOD PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $2k → 10%KALA ART INSTITUTE: $2k → 10%FACTORY FARMING AWARENESS COALITION: $6k → 10%HOMELESS ACTION CENTER: $5k → 10%YOUTH UPRISING: $3k → 10%YOUTH UPRISING: $3k → 10%YOUTH UPRISING: $2k → 10%CAT TOWN: $2k → 10%YOUTH UPRISING: $1k → 10%YOUTH UPRISING: $1k → 10%YOUTH UPRISING: $1k → 10%YOUTH UPRISING: $1k → 10%LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA: $3k → 10%SKYLINE HIGH SCHOOL: $500 → 10%LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA: $2k → 10%SKYLINE HIGH SCHOOL: $300 → 10%LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA: $1k → 10%THE EAST OAKLAND COLLECTIVE: $5k → 10%OAKLAND ZOO CAMP SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $3k → 10%OAKLAND ZOO CAMP SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $3k → 10%OAKLAND ZOO CAMP SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $2k → 10%GEORGE MARK CHILDREN'S HOUSE: $3k → 10%GEORGE MARK CHILDREN'S HOUSE: $2k → 10%GEORGE MARK CHILDREN'S HOUSE: $2k → 10%BANANAS CHILD CARE RESOURCE: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$154k · 12 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$154k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
-1%

Still filing today

50%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +66%
  • TF
    THE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY
    5× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +260%
  • GM
    George Mark Childrens Fund
    2× · 2017–2019 · $7k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • NR
    New Roots Institutegraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +281%
  • TE
    The East Oakland Collective
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • HA
    HOMELESS ACTION CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
2
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
3
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
4
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
5
Oakland Kids First

The mission of Oakland Kids First is to increase youth voice, leadership and power to create engaging and equitable public schools where all students learn and lead.

Youth Development
6
Go Public Schools Advocates

Our mission is to activate the leadership of families, educators, and community allies to advocate on behalf of California children and youth to ensure that all students have access to excellent public schools in their neighborhoods and…

Education
7
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
8
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
9
Nine Lives Foundation

We are a community-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization operating a cat-onlyclinic and adoption center. We rescue at-risk cats and kittens, provide them withclinical care and nurturing to address their medical and behavioral needs and…

Animals
10
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates Inc

Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.

Human Services
11
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
12
Cooperation L a

The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Uprising; the most unlike its peers is Siskiyou Singers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALAMEDA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $58,050 · OtherALAMEDA COMMUNITY FOOD BANKALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $19,000 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANKTHE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY: $11,400 · OtherTHE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARYYOUTH ALIVE: $10,000 · OtherYOUTH ALIVEBICYCLE TRAILS COUNCIL OF EAST: $9,120 · OtherBICYCLE TRAILS COUNCIL OF EASTOAKLAND ZOO CAMP SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $8,100 · OtherOAKLAND ZOO CAMP SCHOLARSHIP FUNDHOMELESS ACTION CENTER: $5,000 · Other+9 more: $15,380 · Other+9 moreLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC: $13,350 · HealthLA CLINICA DE …George Mark Childrens Fund: $7,100 · HealthGeorge Mark Ch…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENT…YOUTH UPRISING: $12,350 · Youth DevelopmentDOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES: $6,433 · AnimalsCAT TOWN: $2,000 · AnimalsNew Roots Institute: $6,001 · Food & NutritionThe East Oakland Collective: $5,000 · Community ImprovementNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,816 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$136,050Health$25,450Youth Development$12,350Animals$8,433Food & Nutrition$6,001Community Improvement$5,000Philanthropy$4,816

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC: $13,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH UPRISING: $12,350 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY: $11,400 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetYOUTH ALIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGeorge Mark Childrens Fund: $7,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES: $6,433 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNew Roots Institute: $6,001 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHack the Hood Inc: $2,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMETHOD PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKala Art Institute: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAT TOWN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSISKIYOU SINGERS: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH UPRISING ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ALIVE ↗
  • Who funds George Mark Childrens Fund ↗
  • Who funds DOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES ↗
  • Who funds New Roots Institute ↗
  • Who funds The East Oakland Collective ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Hack the Hood Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMETHOD PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds Kala Art Institute ↗
  • Who funds CAT TOWN ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SISKIYOU SINGERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community Fo…The San Francisco Fou…Silicon Valley Commun…Kaiser Foundation Hos…New Venture FundAmerican Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Paypal Charitable Giv…Donor Advised Charita…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
East Bay Community FoundationCA21.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · New Venture Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carmen J Moore Charitable Trust Karen C Hopkins Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carmen J Moore Charitable Trust Karen C Hopkins Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Siskiyou Singers: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Carmen J Moore Charitable Trust Karen C Hopkins Trustee?

Find your warmest path to Carmen J Moore Charitable Trust Karen C Hopkins Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carmen J Moore Charitable Trust Karen C Hopkins Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home