Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carl W Johnson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$450k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$645kScience & Tech$468kEducation$400kHealth$380kAnimals$220kYouth Development$220kFood & Nutrition$203kPublic Benefit$93kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $230k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW DIRECTIONS$80,000
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH$50,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$50,000
THE PAINTED TURTLE$50,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES FOUNDATION$30,000
FRIENDS OF THE OBSERVATORY (GRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION)$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
HEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
PASADENA HUMANE$25,000
CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$20,000
HOLLENBECK PALMS$20,000
THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION$15,000
CHRYSALIS$10,000
LOS ANGELES HABILITATION HOUSE$10,000
TAKING THE REINS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $315k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $50k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $20k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $15k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $10k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $10k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $10k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $10k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $10k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $10k → 9%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $5k → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $5k → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $5k → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $5k → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $5k → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $5k → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $5k → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $5k → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 17 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against -29% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$3.2M
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
-29%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsYouth DevelopmentScience & TechEmploymentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GO
    GRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +61%
  • CC
    CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +65%
  • THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +185%

Funded once

  • BA
    BUTTE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue -29%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue -45%
  • WC
    WLACC - CAMP EMERALD BAY
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
2
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
3
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
4
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
5
Los Angeles Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Spcala is dedicated to the prevention of cruelty to animals through education, law enforcement, intervention and advocacy.

Animals
6
Wise and Healthy Aging

The organization is a multi-service, 501c(3) not-for-profit, social services organization serving seniors throughout los angeles and san bernardio counties, with emphasis on low-income and/or underserved individuals. the organization…

Health
7
Greater Los Angeles Veterans Research and Education Foundation

Building partnerships to advance research and education for the health of our nation's veterans.

Health
8
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
9
Los Angeles Accessible Apartments C
—
10
California Rangeland Trust

To serve the land, people and wildlife by conserving california's working rangelands.

Food & Nutrition
11
Arizona Humane Society

We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals
12
Halleck Creek Ranch

Our programs empower participants by focusing on their abilities, helping them achieve personal goals, surpass limitations, and celebrate their strengths.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hollenbeck Palms; the most unlike its peers is Seal Beach Swim Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW DIRECTIONS INC: $500,000 · OtherNEW DIRECTIONS INCCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH: $450,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACHUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $267,763 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERINGIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $250,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES FOUNDATION: $235,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES FOUNDATIONCHRYSALIS: $102,500 · Other+5 more: $149,500 · Other+5 moreCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $145,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COM…THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $125,000 · Human ServicesTHE ACHIEV…TAKING THE REINS: $45,000 · Human ServicesTAKING THE…THE PAINTED TURTLE: $230,000 · Youth DevelopmentGRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Science & TechGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $92,500 · AnimalsPASADENA HUMANE: $25,000 · Animals+1 more: $2,500 · AnimalsLOS ANGELES HABILITATION HOUSE INC: $90,000 · EmploymentHEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION: $90,000 · Health
Other$2,204,763Human Services$315,000Youth Development$230,000Science & Tech$200,000Animals$120,000Employment$90,000Health$90,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW DIRECTIONS INC: $500,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $250,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $230,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetGRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $145,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $92,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES HABILITATION HOUSE INC: $90,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetHEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetHOLLENBECK PALMS: $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSEAL BEACH SWIM CLUB: $45,000 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetTAKING THE REINS: $45,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetBUTTE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW DIRECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE PAINTED TURTLE ↗
  • Who funds GRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES HABILITATION HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOLLENBECK PALMS ↗
  • Who funds SEAL BEACH SWIM CLUB ↗
  • Who funds TAKING THE REINS ↗
  • Who funds PASADENA HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds BUTTE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ahmanson FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carl W Johnson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carl W Johnson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Carl W Johnson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Carl W Johnson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carl W Johnson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph