Skip to content
Carl F and Donna M Rose Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Carl F and Donna M Rose Family Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Religion$47kHuman Services$44kHealth$11kFood & Nutrition$10kHousing & Shelter$10kYouth Development$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$200Public Benefit$150Other$0
02FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$10,000
NATIONAL MPS SOCEITY$10,000
PONTIAC LIGHT HOUSE$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
BALDWIN CENTER$10,000
GLEANERS$10,000
GRACE CENTER OF HOPE$10,000
CHILDRENS VILLAGE$6,523
CENTRAL METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%CHILDRENS VILLAGE: $7k → 9%RED CROSS: $100 → 14%LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH: $2k → 11%LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH: $1k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH: $1k → 11%LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH: $1k → 11%BALDWIN CENTER: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
PA
NE
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53k · 7 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +145% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
18

Total granted

$53k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+145%
+43%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LY
    LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $5k · revenue +146%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $300 · revenue +145%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2017–2019 · $200 · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • ES
    EASTER SEALS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -10%
  • FF
    Father Flanagan's Boys' Homegraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100 · revenue +43%
  • TG
    THE GRAYSON SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100 · revenue +734%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Edward W Sparrow Hospital

Improving the health of the people in our communities by providing quality, compassionate care to everyone, every time.

Health
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
7
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
8
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
9
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
12
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Village Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL METHODIST CHURCH: $46,921 · OtherCENTRAL METHODIST CHURCHBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $10,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBPONTIAC LIGHT HOUSE: $10,000 · OtherPONTIAC LIGHT HOUSEGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE: $10,000 · OtherGRACE CENTERS OF HOPENATIONAL MPS SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL MPS SOCIETY INC+14 more: $3,820 · OtherTHE BALDWIN CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE BALDWIN CENTER…THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $6,523 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S VIL…LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesLIBERTY YOUTH RANC…+2 more: $300 · Human ServicesGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $100 · Food & NutritionHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $300 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $100 · HealthNational Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc: $100 · HealthTHE GRAYSON SCHOOL: $100 · EducationMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $40 · PhilanthropySPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $20 · Recreation & Sports
Other$90,741Human Services$21,823Food & Nutrition$10,100Housing & Shelter$10,000Health$500Education$100Philanthropy$40Recreation & Sports$20

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BALDWIN CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MPS SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $6,523 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY YOUTH RANCH INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $2,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRAYSON SCHOOL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodNatl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Network for GoodDC9.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carl F and Donna M Rose Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carl F and Donna M Rose Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carl F and Donna M Rose Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home