Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Carl & Tammy Birnberg Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Human Services$62kEducation$56kReligion$54kPhilanthropy$12kArts & Culture$6kRecreation & Sports$3kInternational$3kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION$12,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
HEILICHER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL$2,500
SHOLOM COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $100 → 6%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE DESERTS: $50k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF THE DESERTS: $126 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
NY
IA
PA
CA
MD
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$179k · 9 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
20

Total granted

$179k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+28%

Still filing today

22%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesReligionInternationalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HJ
    HEILICHER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL
    2× · 2021–2024 · $53k
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT
    2× · 2020–2021 · $50k · revenue +56%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA HILLEL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $41k

Funded once

  • TO
    TEMPLE OF AARON
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
  • HC
    HERZL CAMP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +11%
  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +67%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
2
Minnesota Jewish Community Center Foundation

The minnesota jcc foundation's sole purpose is to support the minnesota jcc.

Human Services
3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

5
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
6
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
7
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
8
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
9
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
10
Beth Israel Medical Center

Since its founding, over 120 years ago, as a medical dispensary to meet the needs of the impoverished and underserved jewish community of the lower east side, beth israel medical center has been committed to the care of persons of all…

Health
11
Isabella Geriatric Center Inc

Operating as isabella center for rehabilitation and nursing care, isabella is a 705-bed not-for-profit organization that is a member of the mjhs health system family. isabella is committed to providing exceptional short-term, sub-acute…

Human Services
12
Jewish Federation of Omaha Inc

To build and sustain a strong and vibrant omaha jewish community and to support jews in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minnesota Jewish Community Center and the most unlike its peers is Children's Health Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HEILICHER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL — $52,500 · OtherHEILICHER JEWISH DAY SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA HILLEL — $40,600 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA HILLELIndividual grant recipient — $13,354 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION — $12,000 · OtherST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATIONTEMPLE OF AARON — $11,000 · OtherTEMPLE OF AARONSTPAUL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $9,130 · OtherSTPAUL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERMCCALLUM THEATER — $6,000 · Other+16 more — $13,106 · Other+16 moreJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT — $50,416 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF T…+1 more — $100 · Human ServicesHERZL CAMP FOUNDATION — $3,100 · ReligionBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $3,000 · InternationalALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $2,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE — $100 · HealthANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $500 · Civil RightsSHOLOM COMMUNITY ALLIANCE — $400 · Housing & Shelter
Other$157,690Human Services$50,516Religion$3,100International$3,000Health$2,100Civil Rights$500Housing & Shelter$400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT — $50,416 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetHERZL CAMP FOUNDATION — $3,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $2,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOLOM COMMUNITY ALLIANCE — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrganic Acidemia Association Corporation — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIFERETH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERHOUSE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY MEAL — $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT
  • Who funds HERZL CAMP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds ALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds SHOLOM COMMUNITY ALLIANCE
  • Who funds Organic Acidemia Association Corporation
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
  • Who funds TIFERETH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds CORNERHOUSE
  • Who funds EVERY MEAL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alex G & Mollie Tankenoff Family FoundationMN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alex G & Mollie Tankenoff Family Foundation · Marshall & Elaine Siegel Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Carl & Tammy Birnberg Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph