Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alex G & Mollie Tankenoff Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$31k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of ALEX G & MOLLIE TANKENOFF FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$638k
Total assets

Anchored by a single position — about 95% of reported assets are held in Us Bank.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MN$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MNSD$4,000
TEMPLE OF AARON$3,800
ALZHEIMERS ASSOC OF MNND$2,500
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SRV MPLS$2,400
HOPKINS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,500
THE SHOLOM FOUNDATION$1,500
JEWISH COMM REALTIONS COUNCIL$1,000
MINNESOTA HILLEL$1,000
MINNESOTA OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE$1,000
HERZL CAMP FOUNDATION$500
TPT$500
MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM MIM$500
NC LITTLE MEMORIAL HOSPICE$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ICA FOOD SHELF: $500 → 11%NEW YORK PEACE INSTITUTE: $1k → 17%THE SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%THE SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$202k · 20 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
12

Total granted

$202k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+37%

Still filing today

65%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureReligionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $11k · revenue +37%
  • NC
    N C LITTLE MEMORIAL HOSPICE INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +45%
  • MJ
    MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    3× · 2017–2021 · $7k · revenue +147%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • JI
    J-HAP INC
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue -19%
  • MO
    MN OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE MOCA
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Jewish Community Center Foundation

The minnesota jcc foundation's sole purpose is to support the minnesota jcc.

Human Services
2
Jewish Community Action

Jewish community action's mission is to organize minnesota jews on key issues impacting our families and neighbors, including religious freedom, affordable housing and public safety.

Civil Rights
3
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

4
Jewish Historical Society of the Upper Midwest

The purpose of the society is to promote the vitality and continuity of jewish culture in the upper midwest through preservation, interpretation and education.

5
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

Education
6
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

7
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

8
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
9
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

10
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
11
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
12
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minneapolis Jewish Federation and the most unlike its peers is Volunteer Lawyers for Justice in. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%5%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr19%18%20–35yr14%18%35–55yr13%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%3%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%38%10–20yr19%12%20–35yr14%5%35–55yr13%42%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
14%
2,168/15,516

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MNSD — $24,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MNSDALZHEIMERS ASSOC OF MNND — $19,500 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOC OF MNNDJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SRV MPLS — $17,200 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SRV MPLSTEMPLE OF AARON — $10,160 · OtherTEMPLE OF AARONNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR JEWISH WOMEN — $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR JEWISH WOMENMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $6,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · Other+17 more — $26,830 · Other+17 moreSHOLOM COMMUNITY ALLIANCE — $50,500 · Housing & ShelterSHOLOM COMMUNITY ALLIAN…J-HAP INC — $3,600 · Housing & ShelterJ-HAP INC+1 more — $500 · Housing & ShelterMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION — $31,100 · PhilanthropyMINNEAPOLIS JE…HOPKINS EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $1,500 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MINNESOTA (MN) SECTION — $20,250 · Community ImprovementMinnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance Inc — $10,500 · HealthN C LITTLE MEMORIAL HOSPICE INC — $6,750 · HealthSHOLOM FOUNDATION — $5,100 · Human ServicesNEW YORK PEACE INSTITUTE INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesINTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC — $500 · Human ServicesMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM — $4,000 · Arts & CultureTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC — $1,490 · Arts & Culture
Other$125,290Housing & Shelter$54,600Philanthropy$32,600Community Improvement$20,250Health$17,250Human Services$6,600Arts & Culture$5,490

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHOLOM COMMUNITY ALLIANCE — $50,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION — $31,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MINNESOTA (MN) SECTION — $20,250 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetMinnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance Inc — $10,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetN C LITTLE MEMORIAL HOSPICE INC — $6,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHOLOM FOUNDATION — $5,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM — $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJ-HAP INC — $3,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS — $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA HILLEL — $2,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPKINS EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC — $1,490 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PEACE INSTITUTE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE IN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHERZL CAMP FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHOLOM COMMUNITY ALLIANCE
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MINNESOTA (MN) SECTION
  • Who funds Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance Inc
  • Who funds N C LITTLE MEMORIAL HOSPICE INC
  • Who funds MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds SHOLOM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM
  • Who funds J-HAP INC
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS
  • Who funds MINNESOTA HILLEL
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds HONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HOPKINS EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK PEACE INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE IN
  • Who funds HERZL CAMP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds INTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM
  • Who funds MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN25.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Marshall & Elaine Siegel Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Baratz Family Foundation Inc · The Rum Fund · Mike & Linda Fiterman Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Oren and Sharron Steinfeldt Foundation · Moscoe Family Foundation · Robert and Susan Diamond Foundation · Tankenoff Families Foundation · Carl & Tammy Birnberg Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alex G & Mollie Tankenoff Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • Volunteer Lawyers for Justice in9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alex G & Mollie Tankenoff Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Alex G & Mollie Tankenoff Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph