Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carl & Lucile Oestreicher Foundation C/O Lynn Jeffrey

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$63kInternational$39kCommunity Improvement$29kArts & Culture$23kHuman Services$18kFood & Nutrition$18kYouth Development$9kAnimals$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$67k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FACES$5,000
ECPAT - USA$2,000
180 TURNING LIVES AROUND$2,000
AXELROD PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN NJ$2,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$1,000
AMERICARES$1,000
LUNCH BREAK$1,000
FEEDING AMERICA$1,000
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA$1,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,000
ASPCA OF MONMOUTH COUNTY$1,000
KIPS BAY BOYS CLUB$500
I SUPPORT THE GIRLS$500
BRIDGEHAMPTON MUSEUM$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $2k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $1k → 14%180 TURNING LIVES AROUND: $3k → 6%180 TURNING LIVES AROUND: $3k → 6%180 TURNING LIVES AROUND: $2k → 6%180 TURNING LIVES AROUND: $2k → 6%180 TURNING LIVES AROUND: $2k → 6%180 TURNING LIVES AROUND: $2k → 6%180 TURNING LIVES AROUND: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$186k · 19 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +71% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
15

Total granted

$186k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+71%

Still filing today

74%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EI
    ECPAT-USA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +282%
  • 1T
    180 TURNING LIVES AROUND
    7× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +95%
  • AXELROD PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $9k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • SC
    STONE & COMPASS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • NF
    NYU FACES
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
3
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
4
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition
7
Feeding Westchester Inc

Driven by the belief that access to healthy food is a basic right for all people, feeding westchester leads hunger action programs and mobilizes the resources needed to eradicate hunger in westchester county.

—
8
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
9
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
10
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
11
Second Harvest Heartland

Second harvest heartland's mission is to end hunger together. in partnership with more than 1,000 food shelves and hunger-relief programs in minnesota and western wisconsin, we provided 145 million meals to neighbors last year.

Food & Nutrition
12
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the World Food Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FACES: $34,000 · OtherFACESPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN NJ: $21,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN NJASPCA OF MONMOUTH COUNTY: $6,000 · OtherASPCA OF MONMOUTH COUNTYNYU FACES: $5,000 · OtherNYU FACES+14 more: $13,500 · Other+14 moreECPAT-USA INC: $28,500 · InternationalECPAT-USA INCAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $8,500 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $4,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN…THE DECENCY FOUNDATION: $29,000 · Community ImprovementTHE DECENCY FOUND…FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $4,000 · Community ImprovementFOOD BANK FOR NEW…AXELROD PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $8,500 · Arts & CultureAXELROD PERFO…STONE & COMPASS INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureSTONE & COMPA…The Boston Camerata Inc: $4,000 · Arts & CultureThe Boston Ca…THREE GENERATIONS INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureTHREE GENERAT…The Society of the Four Arts Inc: $2,500 · Arts & CultureThe Society o…SAG HARBOR PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture180 TURNING LIVES AROUND: $16,000 · Human Services180 TURNIN…FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF…+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesLUNCH BREAK INC: $8,500 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $1,500 · Food & NutritionNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $1,000 · Food & NutritionOPHTHALMICEDGE INC: $1,500 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,000 · Health
Other$79,500International$41,000Community Improvement$33,000Arts & Culture$26,000Human Services$19,000Food & Nutrition$11,000Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DECENCY FOUNDATION: $29,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetECPAT-USA INC: $28,500 over 8y, 0.8% of budget180 TURNING LIVES AROUND: $16,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAXELROD PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $8,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLUNCH BREAK INC: $8,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Boston Camerata Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHREE GENERATIONS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetThe Society of the Four Arts Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPHTHALMICEDGE INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAG HARBOR PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFor the Girls Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEHAMPTON COMMUNITY HOUSE ASSOCIATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE DECENCY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ECPAT-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds 180 TURNING LIVES AROUND ↗
  • Who funds AXELROD PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LUNCH BREAK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STONE & COMPASS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds The Boston Camerata Inc ↗
  • Who funds THREE GENERATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Society of the Four Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds OPHTHALMICEDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SAG HARBOR PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds For the Girls Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEHAMPTON COMMUNITY HOUSE ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carl & Lucile Oestreicher Foundation C/O Lynn Jeffrey funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carl & Lucile Oestreicher Foundation C/O Lynn Jeffrey. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • 180 Turning Lives Around: 61% of income from government
  • Axelrod Performing Arts Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Lunch Break Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Boston Camerata Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carl & Lucile Oestreicher Foundation C/O Lynn Jeffrey’s filings →

More from the funding graph