Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carl & Elinor Glyn Thom Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$117kFood & Nutrition$81kHealth$74kYouth Development$65kHuman Services$46kPhilanthropy$32kCommunity Improvement$20kHousing & Shelter$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$2,081
Median grant
5
States reached
$672k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VANGUARD CHARITABLE ACCOUNT$25,000
LADY LODGE YOUTH CAMP$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HELPING HAND HOME$5,000
DAWN FARM$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,081
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,000
MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES$2,000
MEALS ON WHEELS CENTAL TEXAS$2,000
MIKE ROWE'S WORK FUND$1,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$500
COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 9%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $50 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
IA
NJ
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$372k · 34 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
33

Total granted

$372k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+22%

Still filing today

32%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DI
    Dawn Incorporated
    8× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +73%
  • Central Texas Food Bank Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $31k · revenue +11%
  • ML
    MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $26k · revenue +218%

Funded once

  • TR
    THE RANCH AT DOVE TREE
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • KM
    KEALING MIDDLE SCHOOLD
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
2
Digital Harbor Foundation

Democratizing societal and economic well-being through digital equity for everyone, increased diversity in the tech sector, innovative education, and technology for the public good

Education
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
5
Patient Access Network Foundation

As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…

—
6
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
7
America's Charities

America's charities provides charities with financial support through workplace giving and additional paths. america's charities also provides direct financial assistance to those impacted by disasters and other emergencies.

—
8
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
9
Moral Compass Federation Inc

Moral compass federation facilitates collaboration among multiple veteran-led nonprofit organizations, individuals, and businesses who came together during the fall of kabul, afghanistan to evacuate and resettle afghan allies who were in…

Public Benefit
10
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
11
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
12
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is H E Butt Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAITY LODGE YOUTH CAMP: $40,000 · OtherLAITY LODGE YOUTH CAMPVANGUARD CHARITABLE ACCOUNT: $25,000 · OtherVANGUARD CHARITABLE ACCOUNTHELPING HAND HOME: $25,000 · OtherHELPING HAND HOMEMEALS ON WHEELS CENTAL TEXAS: $19,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS CENTAL TEXASLADY LODGE YOUTH CAMP: $15,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $11,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $11,000 · Other+56 more: $172,358 · Other+56 moreDawn Incorporated: $53,450 · HealthDawn Incorpor…+2 more: $1,500 · HealthCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $31,000 · Food & NutritionMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $26,000 · ReligionAnchoRRa: $20,000 · Community ImprovementDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $3,500 · Arts & CultureTHE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $500 · Arts & CultureGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$318,358Health$54,950Food & Nutrition$31,000Religion$26,000Community Improvement$20,000Arts & Culture$9,000Philanthropy$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDawn Incorporated: $53,450 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $26,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetH E BUTT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHealth Alliance for Austin Musicians: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAINBOW CONNECTION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPease Park Conservancy: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEAD FOR THE CURE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dawn Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds AnchoRRa ↗
  • Who funds H E BUTT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Health Alliance for Austin Musicians ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carl & Elinor Glyn Thom Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carl & Elinor Glyn Thom Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carl & Elinor Glyn Thom’s filings →

    More from the funding graph