Skip to content
Care2 Fund at Usli Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Care2 Fund at Usli Inc

To provide the employees of USLI the opportunity to request donations to be made to charities and causes to which they have a direct, personal connection, and to serve as a portal for funds raised from USLI employees and customers to support a broad range of charitable causes and organizations.

$867k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$2.8MFood & Nutrition$2.4MPhilanthropy$279kPublic Safety & Disaster$259kInternational$213kHousing & Shelter$111kHuman Services$87kEducation$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $710,883, the rows itemized in this filing. The $867,038 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $156,155 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $151k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$345k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
breastcancer dot org$500,000
Team IMPACT$60,000
UN Foundation dba United to Beat Malaria$42,196
Eagles Autism Challenge Inc$17,992
Forward Philadelphia$10,695
Foundation for the Homeless$10,000
St Louis Crisis Nursery$10,000
Childrens Home & Aid Society of Illinois dba Brightpoint$10,000
Neighbors Together Inc$10,000
Urban Peak Denver$10,000
Love A Child Missions$10,000
Boise Rescue Mission Ministries$10,000
Families Forward California$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $158k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Love A Child Missions: $10k → 9%Neighbors Together Inc: $10k → 12%Childrens Home & Aid Society of Illinois dba Brightpoint: $10k → 14%Forward Philadelphia: $11k → 22%American Red Cross: $60k → 14%Families Forward Philadelphia: $5k → 22%American Red Cross: $25k → 14%American Red Cross: $18k → 14%American Red Cross: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
SC
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.9M · 16 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
12

Total granted

$5.9M
$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-17%

Still filing today

81%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • B
    BREASTCANCERORG
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +158%
  • UC
    URBAN CREATORS
    4× · 2020–2023 · $459k · revenue +99%
  • TI
    TEAM IMPACT INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $194k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF PHILADELPHIA DELAWARE AND SUSQUEHANNA VALLEYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +78%
  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -17%
  • MG
    MAYFIELD GRAVES COUNTY TORNADO RELIEF FUND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -98%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
2
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
3
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
6
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
7
Techbridge Inc

Techbridge breaks the cycle of generational poverty through the innovative use of technology to transform nonprofit and community impact. techbridge's work is focused on four pillars: hunger relief, homeless support, social justice and…

Philanthropy
8
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation

The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…

Health
9
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
12
The Minneapolis Foundation

The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Impact Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Federation of Red Cross Red Crescent Soc At the Un Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
16/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BREASTCANCERORG: $2,553,570 · HealthBREASTCANCERORG+6 more: $243,440 · Health+6 more12th Street Cantina Inc: $1,942,500 · Other12th Street Cantina Inc+10 more: $148,437 · Other+10 moreURBAN CREATORS: $459,311 · Food & NutritionTEAM IMPACT INC: $193,791 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $57,782 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $20,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $15,190 · PhilanthropyUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $213,409 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · InternationalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $112,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTRAVELERS AID SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $15,695 · Human ServicesLOVE-A-CHILD MISSIONS: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL: $10,000 · Human ServicesNeighbors Together Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesPOURED OUT INC: $118,617 · Public Safety & DisasterMAYFIELD GRAVES COUNTY TORNADO RELIEF FUND INC: $25,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Health$2,797,010Other$2,090,937Food & Nutrition$459,311Philanthropy$286,763International$243,409Human Services$178,195Public Safety & Disaster$143,617

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBREASTCANCERORG: $2,553,570 over 6y, 8.6% of budgetURBAN CREATORS: $459,311 over 4y, 22% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $213,409 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM IMPACT INC: $193,791 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPOURED OUT INC: $118,617 over 3y, 26% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $112,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC: $81,450 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $57,782 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF PHILADELPHIA DELAWARE AND SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYFIELD GRAVES COUNTY TORNADO RELIEF FUND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $24,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILIES FORWARD: $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN PEAK DENVER: $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY: $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRAVELERS AID SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $15,695 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF RED CROSS RED CRESCENT SOC AT THE UN INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCB COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $14,103 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE LIV PROJECT: $11,990 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetLA SALLE ACADEMY: $10,334 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HAWAII TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCORAL GABLES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,690 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…The Cigna Group Found…Citizens Charitable F…Chubb Charitable Foun…The Blackbaud Giving …Morgan Stanley Global…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Paypal Charitable Giv…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New JerseyPA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Cigna Group Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Care2 Fund at Usli Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Care2 Fund at Usli Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • National Center for Victims of Crime Inc: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Care2 Fund at Usli Inc?

Find your warmest path to Care2 Fund at Usli Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Care2 Fund at Usli’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home