Skip to content
Care Net at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Care Net

Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Care Net offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered support through our life-affirming network of pregnancy centers, organizations, and individuals.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$3.0MHealth$437kReligion$10k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $17,296, the rows itemized in this filing. The $28,496 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,296
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Care Net of Puget Sound$10,296
Hill Country Pregnancy Care Center$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%Life Choices Center: $9k → 20%Sav-a-Life Inc: $17k → 16%Parkville Women's Clinic: $9k → 8%Care Net of Southeastern Connecticut: $9k → 9%Hope Rising: $9k → 14%Choices Women's Center: $17k → 8%Life Choices Center: $8k → 20%Sav-A-Life Inc: $8k → 16%Parkville Women's Clinic: $8k → 8%Care Net of Southeastern Connecticut: $8k → 9%Hope Rising: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
WI
MI
NY
OR
IA
IN
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
NM
TN
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 20 repeat orgs$154k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
12

Total granted

$3.3M
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+8%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WTL THE WAY TRUTH AND LIFE OUTREACH
    5× · 2018–2022 · $2.9M · revenue +309% · 50% of their budget
  • BC
    BAKERSFIELD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $34k · revenue +25%
  • AW
    A WOMAN'S CHOICE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $34k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • CW
    CASCADE WOMEN'S HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $17k · revenue -16%
  • FP
    Fredericksburg Pregnancy Centergraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $17k · revenue +27%
  • WH
    WOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC
    one grant, 2022 · $17k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life Choices Pregnancy Care Center Inc

The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…

Health
2
Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.

—
3
Center for Pregnancy Choices Metro Area

The organization's mission is to honor god's standard of the sanctity of human life by empowering women facing unplanned pregnancies to choose life.

Health
4
A Woman's Choice

Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.

—
5
Brenham Pregnancy Center

Brenham Pregnancy Center is a Christ-centered organization serving women and families experiencing pregnancy related issues, from unplanned pregnancy to pregnancy loss. We provide life-affirming consultation, education, spiritual support,…

Health
6
Life Choices Care Center

To provide support for pregnant women

Health
7
Lifechoice Pregnancy Care Center

To provide support to unplanned pregnancies.

—
8
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
9
Pregnancy Care Center Inc Dba Life Choices Clinic

Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Life Choices Clinic offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered…

Health
10
Life Choices Pregnancy Center Inc

We are an outreach ministry of jesus christ committed to providing compassionate guidance, education, and help for all involved prior to, during, and following an unplanned pregnancy.

Health
11
Life Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina

Choosing Life over Abortion

Human Services
12
Birthchoice

Consulting for pregnant women. community service referrals.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Choice Women's Medical Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fredericksburg Pregnancy Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
22/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WTL THE WAY TRUTH AND LIFE OUTREACH: $2,890,000 · ReligionWTL THE WAY TRUTH AND LIFE OUTREACHBAKERSFIELD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $33,500 · HealthBAKERSFIEL…FIRST CHOICE FOR WOMEN INC: $33,500 · HealthFIRST CHOI…A WOMAN'S CHOICE INC: $33,500 · HealthA WOMAN'S …LAKESHORE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $25,000 · HealthLAKESHORE …CASCADE WOMEN'S HEALTH: $17,000 · HealthALTERNATIVES PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $17,000 · HealthFYNDOUT FREE PREGNANCY CENTER: $17,000 · HealthFirst Coast Womens Services Inc: $16,500 · HealthAGAPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $16,500 · HealthAlternatives Pregnancy Center Inc: $16,500 · HealthSKYLARK CLINIC INC: $16,500 · HealthCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE INC: $16,500 · Health+7 more: $61,296 · Health+7 moreSAV-A-LIFE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesFredericksburg Pregnancy Center: $17,000 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER INC: $16,500 · Human ServicesHOPE RISING PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $16,500 · Human ServicesLIFE CHOICES CENTER INC: $16,500 · Human ServicesParkville Womens Clinic: $16,500 · Human ServicesHILL COUNTRY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $26,000 · OtherA CHOICE FOR LIFE INC: $16,500 · OtherAAA WOMEN'S SERVICES INC: $16,500 · OtherFIRST CHOICE WOMEN'S MEDICAL CENTER INC: $16,500 · OtherEL PASOANS FOR LIFE INC: $16,500 · OtherChoose Life Of North Alabama Inc: $8,000 · OtherWOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC: $17,000 · Civil Rights
Religion$2,890,000Health$320,296Human Services$108,000Other$100,000Civil Rights$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWTL THE WAY TRUTH AND LIFE OUTREACH: $2,890,000 over 5y, 50% of budgetBAKERSFIELD CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $33,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetFIRST CHOICE FOR WOMEN INC: $33,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetA WOMAN'S CHOICE INC: $33,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetHILL COUNTRY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $26,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSAV-A-LIFE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetLAKESHORE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCASCADE WOMEN'S HEALTH: $17,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFredericksburg Pregnancy Center: $17,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetWOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC: $17,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetALTERNATIVES PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $17,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetFYNDOUT FREE PREGNANCY CENTER: $17,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetPREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER INC: $16,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetA CHOICE FOR LIFE INC: $16,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAAA WOMEN'S SERVICES INC: $16,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFirst Coast Womens Services Inc: $16,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFIRST CHOICE WOMEN'S MEDICAL CENTER INC: $16,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHOPE RISING PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $16,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAGAPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $16,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAlternatives Pregnancy Center Inc: $16,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSKYLARK CLINIC INC: $16,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLIFE CHOICES CENTER INC: $16,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetParkville Womens Clinic: $16,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE INC: $16,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEL PASOANS FOR LIFE INC: $16,500 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetCare Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound: $10,296 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF HOUSTON: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetChoose Life Of North Alabama Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBlue Ridge Pregnancy Center Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLIFE CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER ROBERTS: $7,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFirst Image: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Knights of Columbus C…Vitamin Angel Allianc…American Endowment Fo…Mission Pre-Born Inc4 USNatl Christian Charit…Save the StorksThe Blackbaud Giving …Raymond James Charita…Shell USA Company Fou…Renaissance Charitabl…Vanguard Charitable E…
Knights of Columbus Charities IncCT47.1× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Mission Pre-Born Inc · 4 US · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Save the Storks · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Care Net funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Care Net. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Care Net’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home