Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Capital Impact Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$961k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$5.3MInternational$2.1MRecreation & Sports$424kHealth$172kEmployment$170kHuman Services$124kCommunity Improvement$98kPhilanthropy$64kOther$0
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k31 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $178k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.2M
$2,280
Median grant
15
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Forever young foundation$961,000
ENGAGE NOW AFRICA INC$250,000
Opportunity Network$55,000
MENLO SCHOOL$35,000
Silicon Valley Foundation$26,250
UTAH BASKETBALL CLUB$25,000
Yapay Bolivia Foundation$25,000
SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS FOUNDATION$20,000
Him for Her$15,000
Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc$12,000
SF Partnership$10,000
First Things First Foundation$10,000
Apollo theater$5,000
UCLS Foundation$5,000
Foster city youth softball$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Send It: $213 → 11%Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc: $12k → 14%Thornwell: $300 → 18%Connecticut Partnership for Children Inc: $200 → 12%One Simple Wish: $66 → 11%Camp Kesem: $5k → 14%SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%San Francisco 49ers Foundation: $20k → 8%Camp Kesem: $5k → 14%San Francisco 49ers Foundation: $15k → 8%San Francisco 49ers Foundation: $15k → 8%Rising Star Outreach Inc: $5k → 8%Rising Star Outreach Inc: $5k → 8%Rising Star Outreach Inc: $5k → 8%Innocence Project Inc: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
MD
DE
AZ
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 27% of Capital Impact Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Capital Impact Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.2M · 50 repeat orgs$501k to everyone else

50 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
84

Total granted

$8.2M
$401k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+41%

Still filing today

66%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FY
    FOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.5M · revenue +33% · 29% of their budget
  • EN
    ENGAGE NOW AFRICA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +49%
  • MS
    MENLO SCHOOL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $205k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • CA
    CHANCE ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +42%
  • CL
    CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF UTAH INC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • TN
    THE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC DBA THE OPPORTUNITY NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +136%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
2
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

5
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
6
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
7
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

8
San Francisco University High School

At san franicisco university high school, we engage our community of diverse voices in a transformational experience that embraces the spirited pursuit of learning and empowers purpose larger than self.

Education
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

10
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
11
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
12
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Golden State Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Palo Alto Youth Robotics Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsChristian Missionary Organi…Youth Sports ProgramsCommunity FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Food Banks and PantriesSchool District FoundationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Equine Therapy ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Domestic Violence ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Cancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%62%20–35yr13%1%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/121
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,444

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

110 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 110 of the 165 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
110/110
Grantees still filing
76/110
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN — $4,481,812 · OtherFOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDRENRight To Play USA — $231,100 · OtherMENLO SCHOOL — $205,000 · Other+91 more — $617,807 · Other+91 moreENGAGE NOW AFRICA INC — $2,000,000 · InternationalENGAGE NOW AFRICA INC+8 more — $68,918 · InternationalSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC — $145,000 · EducationCHANCE ACADEMY — $50,000 · EducationHILLSBOROUGH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $45,000 · EducationMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL — $30,000 · EducationTHE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC DBA THE OPPORTUNITY NETWORK — $25,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANCER RESEARCH INC — $25,000 · EducationAIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL — $20,598 · EducationAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $20,000 · EducationBLACK GIRLS CODE INC — $18,000 · EducationThurgood Marshall College Fund — $18,000 · Education+23 more — $67,810 · EducationOPPORTUNITY NETWORKS INC — $165,000 · PhilanthropyGOLDEN HEART FUND — $30,000 · Philanthropy+5 more — $12,824 · PhilanthropyUTAH BASKETBALL CLUB — $150,000 · Recreation & SportsGOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsMENLO ATHERTON POP WARNER INC — $9,000 · Recreation & SportsFOSTER CITY YOUTH SOFTBALL ASSN — $6,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION — $85,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $15,000 · HealthSAINT FRANCIS FOUNDATION — $12,500 · Health+5 more — $6,120 · HealthSAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION — $70,000 · Human ServicesRising Star Outreach Inc — $15,000 · Human ServicesSalesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc — $12,000 · Human ServicesCamp Kesem National — $10,000 · Human Services+5 more — $3,779 · Human Services
Other$5,535,719International$2,068,918Education$464,408Philanthropy$207,824Recreation & Sports$176,000Health$118,620Human Services$110,779

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN — $4,481,812 over 8y, 29% of budgetENGAGE NOW AFRICA INC — $2,000,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetMENLO SCHOOL — $205,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY NETWORKS INC — $165,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetUTAH BASKETBALL CLUB — $150,000 over 8y, 61% of budgetSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC — $145,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION — $85,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHIM FOR HER INC — $65,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetYAPAY BOLIVIA FOUNDATION — $53,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetCHANCE ACADEMY — $50,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetHILLSBOROUGH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $32,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLIAHONA MOTU FOUNDATION — $31,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetGOLDEN HEART FUND — $30,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL — $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC DBA THE OPPORTUNITY NETWORK — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANCER RESEARCH INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL — $20,598 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK GIRLS CODE INC — $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund — $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRising Star Outreach Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSalesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc — $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDavis Education Foundation — $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Kesem National — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHANKSGIVING POINT INSTITUTE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSF Partnership — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTONY FINAU FOUNDATION FKA FINAU YOUTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $9,612 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPGA TOUR INC — $9,570 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDual Immersion Academy — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOSTER CITY YOUTH SOFTBALL ASSN — $6,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeal Legacy Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSynergist — $5,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetFIT KIDS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Academy Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURE FOUNDATION FOR EAGLE COUNTY — $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,910 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KEHILLAH SCHOOL — $3,880 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC — $3,858 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA22.2× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Daffy Charitable Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · United Way Worldwide · The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Pga Tour Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Capital Impact Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Connecticut Partnership for Children Inc84% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees0% of income from government
  • Basca Inc0% of income from government
  • Pga Tour Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Capital Impact Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Capital Impact Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 165 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph