Skip to content

· Private foundation

Capek Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$12k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Capek Family Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to American Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Capek Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $41k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’21
6
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Philanthropy$112kAnimals$22kCivil Rights$20kReligion$12kHuman Services$10kArts & Culture$9kCommunity Improvement$5kEnvironment$3k
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$12,000
DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION$10,000
COBALT FOUNDATION$10,000
CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC$5,000
ROSEMOUNT MUSEUM$2,000
PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $12k → 15%DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%SANGRE DE CRISTO ARTS CENTER: $4k → 15%COBALT FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%ROSEMOUNT MUSEUM: $4k → 15%COBALT FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%THE NATURE & WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER: $3k → 15%JUNIOR LEAGUE OF DENVER: $5k → 12%ROSEMOUNT MUSEUM: $2k → 15%PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 15%PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58k · 5 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$58k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22
AnimalsCivil RightsHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DZ
    DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue +1%
  • CT
    CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k · revenue +74%
  • PZ
    PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $7k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • JL
    JUNIOR LEAGUE OF DENVER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +10%
  • SD
    SANGRE DE CRISTO ARTS CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • NA
    NATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
2
Red River Zoological Society

As conservation leaders, the red river zoo connects our community to nature and inspires people to help save species.

Animals
3
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
4
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
5
Colorado Wildlife Heritage Foundation Inc

The mission of the Colorado Wildlife Heritage Foundation is to provide a legacy for Colorado through support of environmental stewardship conservation of wildlife and the protection of critical habitat.

Animals
6
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
7
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
8
Nature and Raptor Center of Pueblo

The agency is a conservation Center near Pueblo, CO, where land and people can provide unique experiences in education, conservation and recreation that inspire responsible environmental stewardship.

—
9
Denver Botanic Gardens Inc

The mission of denver botanic gardens is to connect people with plants, especially plants from the rocky mountain region and similar regions around the world, providing delight and enlightenment to everyone.

Environment
10
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

—
11
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
12
Cheyenne Mountain Zoological Society

The cheyenne mountain zoological society owns and operates the cheyenne mountain zoo. a leader in conservation, captive breeding and animal care, the zoo connects people with wildlife and wild places through experiences that inspire…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior League of Denver Inc; the most unlike its peers is Denver Zoological Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN GIFT FUND: $111,659 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN GIFT FUNDDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · AnimalsDENVER ZOOLO…PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $7,000 · AnimalsPUEBLO ZOOLO…COBALT FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Civil RightsCOBALT FOUN…FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $12,000 · OtherFIRST PRE…SANGRE DE CRISTO ARTS CENTER: $3,500 · OtherSANGRE DE…CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesROSEMOUNT MUSEUM INC: $5,500 · Arts & CultureJUNIOR LEAGUE OF DENVER INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementNATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER: $2,500 · Environment
Philanthropy$111,659Animals$22,000Civil Rights$20,000Other$15,500Human Services$10,000Arts & Culture$5,500Community Improvement$5,000Environment$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN GIFT FUND: $111,659 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOBALT FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetROSEMOUNT MUSEUM INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF DENVER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Capek Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Capek Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Capek Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph