Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Canfield Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$4.0MEducation$2.8MArts & Culture$423kPublic Benefit$265kPhilanthropy$175kHuman Services$108kHealth$69kRecreation & Sports$57kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $161k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.0M
$18,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$776k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Central Presbyterian Church$2,025,000
Naples Christian Academy$30,000
Leadership Institute$25,000
Sunshine Ministries$22,500
Magic House$20,000
Alzheimers Association$18,000
Central Christian School$15,000
Turning Point USA$10,000
Allegro Organizational Solutions$10,000
Show Me Institute$10,000
Hillsdale College$5,000
St Luke's Hospital$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SUNSHINE MINISTRIES: $20k → 21%SACRED SPACES OF CARE: $5k → 12%SUNSHINE MINISTRIES: $20k → 21%SUNSHINE MINISTRIES: $15k → 21%SUNSHINE MINISTRIES: $10k → 21%SUNSHINE MINISTRIES: $10k → 21%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 11%SUNSHINE MINISTRIES: $10k → 21%ST LOUIS ARC: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC INC: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC INC: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC INC: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
IN
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.3M · 22 repeat orgs$262k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
21

Total granted

$7.3M
$223k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+32%

Still filing today

55%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SHOW-ME INSTITUTE
    7× · 2018–2025 · $175k · revenue +4%
  • SM
    SUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $108k · revenue +32%
  • AI
    ARTIS-NAPLES INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $50k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • KL
    K LIFE ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2020 · $45k
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $28k
  • WC
    WESTMINSTER CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
    one grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
2
Phoenix Seminary Inc

Phoenix seminary's mission is to train men and women for christ-centered ministry for the building of healthy churches in phoenix and the world.

Education
3
The Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies

The institute's mission is to conduct research on key issues facing society to help both the church and society deal thoughtfully with the major issues they face globally. the institute also sponsors and conducts research and scholarship…

Religion
4
Phillips Theological Seminary Corporation

The seminary's mission is to learn and teach how to be: attentive to god; responsible biblical and theological interpreters; faithful individuals, congregations, and communities acting with god to transform the world.

Education
5
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
6
Summit Ministries Inc

Summit ministries is an educational christian ministry with the purpose of equipping tomorrow's servant leaders to analyze competing worldviews and champion the christian faith, inspiring each one to love god with all his heart, soul,…

7
Pacific School of Religion

Pacific school of religion prepares a diverse cadre of spiritually rooted leaders with the vision, resilience, and skill to create a world where all can thrive. grounded in the rigorous study and faithful practice of progressive christian…

Education
8
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

9
Mid-America Reformed Seminary

Mid-america reformed seminary seeks to serve the church by preparing students for gospel ministry as pastors, or those whose service to the church may be enhanced by theological education.

10
Fuller Theological Seminary

The seminary is a multi-denominational post-baccalaureate school of religious learning that prepares students for christian vocations through its two schools: school of mission & theology and school of psychology & marriage & family…

Education
11
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
12
The Bible Seminary

To foster biblical literacy through studies of all 66 books of the bible, cultivate professional and lay leadership skills, and deploy trained christian disciples in service worldwide.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEducation Equity LeadershipGovernment Accountability R…Classical Music EnsemblesDevelopmental Disabilities …Pregnancy Support ServicesIndependent K-8 SchoolsFallen First Responder Supp…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support OrganizationsHomeless Services & ShelterCommunity Arts OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%7%<5yr12%10%5–10yr16%29%10–20yr15%10%20–35yr16%29%35–55yr24%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%1%5–10yr16%5%10–20yr15%3%20–35yr16%90%35–55yr24%1%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/34
the rest of the field
12%
4,544/39,457

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $4,452,000 · OtherCENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCOVENANT CHURCH OF NAPLES — $1,485,000 · OtherCOVENANT CHURCH OF NAPLES+28 more — $575,568 · Other+28 moreTHE MAGIC HOUSE — $165,000 · Arts & CultureFAITH RXD CO Sports Life Leadership — $155,000 · Arts & CultureARTIS-NAPLES INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureST LOUIS BRIDGE CENTER — $245,300 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $23,000 · EducationWESTMINSTER CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $16,800 · Education+3 more — $17,000 · EducationLeadership Institute — $255,000 · Public BenefitSHOW-ME INSTITUTE — $175,000 · PhilanthropySUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC — $107,500 · Human ServicesTHE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER AKA ASPIRE WOMEN'S CENTER — $10,000 · Human ServicesSACRED SPACES OF CARE — $5,000 · Human Services+1 more — $4,000 · Human ServicesCORE MINISTRIES INC — $55,000 · ReligionActBeyond — $32,000 · ReligionTHE KANAKUK INSTITUTE — $12,250 · ReligionMISSION DISPATCH — $12,000 · Religion
Other$6,512,568Arts & Culture$370,000Education$302,100Public Benefit$255,000Philanthropy$175,000Human Services$126,500Religion$111,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLeadership Institute — $255,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetST LOUIS BRIDGE CENTER — $245,300 over 4y, 31% of budgetSHOW-ME INSTITUTE — $175,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetTHE MAGIC HOUSE — $165,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFAITH RXD CO Sports Life Leadership — $155,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetSUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC — $107,500 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetCORE MINISTRIES INC — $55,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNaples Christian Academy — $50,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetActBeyond — $32,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $26,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $16,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KANAKUK INSTITUTE — $12,250 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER AKA ASPIRE WOMEN'S CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetNAPLES BRIDGE CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAMERICA SHARE USA INC — $7,950 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCARVER PROJECT — $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSACRED SPACES OF CARE — $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetST LOUIS ARC INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSigma Chi Foundation — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Leadership Institute
  • Who funds ST LOUIS BRIDGE CENTER
  • Who funds SHOW-ME INSTITUTE
  • Who funds THE MAGIC HOUSE
  • Who funds FAITH RXD CO Sports Life Leadership
  • Who funds SUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds CORE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC
  • Who funds Naples Christian Academy
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds ActBeyond
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
  • Who funds THE KANAKUK INSTITUTE
  • Who funds MISSION DISPATCH
  • Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds Allegro
  • Who funds THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS
  • Who funds THE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER AKA ASPIRE WOMEN'S CENTER
  • Who funds NAPLES BRIDGE CENTER INC
  • Who funds AMERICA SHARE USA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · John N & Kathleen S MacDonough Foundation Inc · Acts 4 32-34 · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Servant Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Canfield Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph